Relationships between Teamwork Skills and Thinking Styles in Engineering Students

공과대학생의 팀워크 역량과 사고양식의 관계

  • Hwang, Soonhee (Department of Liberal Arts and Science, Hongik University)
  • Received : 2017.01.10
  • Accepted : 2017.03.20
  • Published : 2017.03.30

Abstract

This research aims to explore the relationships between 'teamwork skills' (often called team activity competence) and 'thinking styles' of engineering students in Korea, and to provide an explanation for the application of team-based environment as well as for the increase of teamwork skills. Teams and team activity are pervasive in today's organization and there has been relatively much research on teamwork skills and its related factors. However, to date, little attention has been paid to the teamwork skills, essential factor in team-based environment and its relationships with thinking styles. This study was conducted with 383 engineering students at P University, and students' teamwork skills as well as thinking styles have been measured before and after team-based learning class (hereafter TBL). Our findings show that firstly, there was a significant increase of teamwork skills between before and after TBL class. Second, team activity competence was found to have a higher correlation with most of creativity generating styles (i.e. legislative, judicial, hierarchical and global styles). Third, hierarchical style was found to influence team activity more than other components, and also legislative, external, global and judicial styles contributed to team-based activity. These findings are expected to provide an explanation for the application of thinking styles in team-based environment and will be useful for the improvement of related courses in engineering school.

Keywords

Teamwork Skills;Team Activity Competence;Thinking Styles;Engineering Students;Hierarchical Style

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. 김미종.김경자(2016). 간호사의 임상경력과 조직 내 의사소통이 팀워크 역량에 미치는 영향, 디지털융복합연구, 14(2), 333-344.
  2. 강승희.윤소정(2015). 공학 전공 대학생의 창의성에 나타나는 성차, 한국기계가공학회지, 14(5), 50-59.
  3. 강인애.정은실(2010). 팀 구성 방식에 따른 학습활동 만족도: 질적 자료 분석에 의한 사례연구, 교육방법연구, 22(3), 67-95.
  4. 김민웅.조한진.위선복.김태훈(2016). 창의적 공학 설계 활동에서 팀 규모에 따른 팀 상호작용 분석, 공학교육연구, 19(4), 14-23.
  5. 노혜란.최미나(2016). 대학생 학습공동체에서 구성원의 사고양식에 따른 만족도, 협력적 자기조절, 집단응집성 분석, 교육방법연구, 28(3), 539-560.
  6. 안정호.임지영(2008). 종합설계과목의 협동학습에서 셀프 리더십과 팀웍 간의 관계, 공학교육연구, 11(4), 109-114.
  7. 유정아(2011). 학습자의 학습양식에 따른 선호 교수유형 분석, 한국교원교육연구, 28(2), 51-72.
  8. 윤경미.김정섭(2008). 대학생의 리더십 특성에 관한 연구: 성, 학년, 사고양식을 중심으로, 청소년학연구, 15(7), 319-345.
  9. 윤미선(1997). 사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구: Sternberg의 정신자치제 이론을 중심으로, 고려대학교 석사학위논문.
  10. 윤미선(2007). 사고양식, 성취목표지향성, 성취도, 연령, 성별 특성이 교과흥미에 미치는 영향 - 중고생의 과학교과를 대상으로 -, 교육심리연구, 21(3), 557-572.
  11. 윤미선.김성일(2004). 중,고생의 학업성취 결정요인으로서 사고양식, 학습동기, 교과흥미, 학습 전략 간의 관계모형, 교육심리연구, 18(2), 161-180.
  12. 이은경.윤지현.강성주(2013). 토의를 강조한 소집단 활동이 과학고 학생의 탐구 과정에 미치는 영향과 학습양식.사고양식 간의 관계에 대한 사례 연구, 영재와 영재교육, 12(2), 115-140.
  13. 이은철(2013). 대학 학습동아리 활동 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색을 통한 지원 전략 개발 연구, 열린교육연구, 21(4), 351-374.
  14. 이정규.김진철(2005). 사고양식과 학업성취 간의 관계구조에서 특목고와 일반고의 차이, 교육방법연구, 17(1), 1-17.
  15. 정정호.장동련(2014). 창의적 디자인융합인재의 사고양식 유형, 디자인학연구, 27(2), 215-229.
  16. 한기순.배미란(2004). 과학영재와 일반 학생들 간의 사고양식과 지능 및 창의성 간의 관계 비교, 교육심리연구, 18(2), 49-68.
  17. 한지영.방재현(2015). 공학계열 학생들의 팀웍 스킬과 성격 5요인과의 관계 연구, 공학교육연구, 18(2), 43-51.
  18. 황순희(2014). 팀 기반 스피치 수업의 교육적 효과 분석: 창의성 함양을 위한 교육 사례를 중심으로, 교양교육연구, 8(3), 287-322.
  19. 황순희.윤경미(2016). 공과대학생의 의사소통능력과 사고양식의 관계, 교양교육연구, 10(3), 515-548.
  20. Cheung, C., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X., & Kwan, A.S.(2003). Creativity of university students: What is the impact of field and year study?. Journal of creative behavior, 37 (1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00825.x
  21. Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E.(1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23 (3), 239-290.
  22. Dai, D.Y., & Feldhusen, J.F. (1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21 (4), 302-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553981
  23. Hatcher, L., & Ross, T.L.(1991). From individual incentives to an organization‐wide gainsharing plan: Effects on teamwork and product quality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12 (3), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120302
  24. Jacobson, C.M.(1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in the USA. Psychological Reports 72, 1131-1138. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1131
  25. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A.(1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company, 7208 Cornelia Drive, Edina, MN 55435.
  26. Kim, J. & Michael, W.B.(1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement 55 (1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055001006
  27. Knight, D.W., Carlson, L.E., & Sullivan, J.F.(2003). Staying in engineering: Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention. In CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition.
  28. Levi, D., & Cadiz, D.(1998). Evaluating Team Work on Student Projects: The Use of Behaviorally Anchored Scales To Evaluate Student Performance, http://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED424250.pdf
  29. Liu, X., Magjuka, R.J., & Lee, S.H.(2008). The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students' learning and virtual team performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00775.x
  30. Michaelsen, L.K., Watson, W.E., & Black, R.H.(1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (5), 834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.834
  31. Michaelsen, L.K., Knight, A.B., & Fink, L.D.(Eds.).(2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Greenwood publishing group.
  32. O'Shei, T.(1998). Engineers are Taught How to be True Team Players. Business First, 14 (41), 31-33.
  33. Pun, K.F., Yam, R.C., & Sun, H.(2003). Teaching new product development in universities: an action learning approach. European journal of engineering education, 28 (3), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379031000106418
  34. Resta, P. & Laferriere, T.(2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
  35. Sadler-Smith, E., & Riding, R.(1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences. Instructional science, 27 (5), 355-371.
  36. Salas, E., Sims, D.E., & Burke, C.S.(2005). Is there a "Big Five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36 (5), 555-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134
  37. Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., & Rosen, M.A.(2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50 (3), 540-547. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
  38. Smith, K.A.(1996). Cooperative learning: Making "group work" work. In Sutherland, T.E. & Bonwell, C. C.(Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty (pp. 71-82), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  39. Sternberg, R.J.(1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human development, 31 (4), 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000275810
  40. Sternberg, R.J.(1994). Allowing for thinking styles. Educational leadership, 52 (3), 36-40.
  41. Sternberg, R.J.(1999). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Sternberg, R.J. & Wagner, R.K.(1991). MSG thinking styles inventory: Manual. Star Mountain Projects.
  43. Stevens, M.J., & Campion, M.A.(1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25 (2), 207-228.
  44. Valenti, M.(1996). Teaching tomorrow's engineers. Mechanical Engineering, 118 (7), 64-69.
  45. Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W., & Bommer, W.(2003). The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63 (2), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00041-1
  46. Zhang, Li-Fang(1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. The Journal of Psychology 133 (2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599731
  47. Zhang, Li-fang(2000). Thinking styles and personality types revisited. Personality and individual Differences, 31 (6), 883-894.
  48. Zhang, Li-fang, and Huang, J.(2001). Thinking styles and the five factor model of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(6), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.429
  49. Zhu, Ch.. & Zhang, L.F.(2011). Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students, Educational Psychology 31(3), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.557044