News, Public Policy, and Social Justice

  • Kumar, Sunil (Centre for Culture, Media & Governance (CCMG), Jamia Millia Islamia)
  • Received : 2016.12.16
  • Published : 2017.05.31


In this paper, we look at mediation of public policies in different areas of governance. Editorials appearing in an Indian English language newspaper during the period of an intense public debate on the issue of affirmative action in favor of a section of the population, the Other Backward Classes (OBC) - a popular reference to the socially and educationally backward classes of citizens under India's constitution constitute the sample for the study. Apart from editorials on the public policy of reservation of seats in admission to higher education institutions for the OBC, editorials on three other areas of governance, namely, development, economy, and public administration appearing in the same newspaper, are also consulted to understand media framing of social issues and more specifically, issues of social justice. Inductively identifying the various frames used in its editorials by the newspaper, I detect predominant use of 'personalized' frame in respect of editorials pertaining to the policy area of social justice; and distinguish it from the 'generic' frame of 'characterization' found in theory. The study concludes that the sample editorials in respect of other public policies did not use the personalized frame found in editorials on social justice.



  1. Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61: 246-263.
  3. Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662-704.
  4. Cohen, S., & Young, J. (1973). The Manufacture of News: A Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
  5. Critcher, C. (2003). Moral panics and the media. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  6. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
  7. Davis, A. (2007). Investigating journalist influences on political issue agendas at Westminster. Political Communication, 24(2),181-199.
  8. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
  9. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
  10. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London, England: Arnold.
  11. Fine, T. S, (1999). The impact of issue framing on public opinion: Toward affirmative actionprograms. The Social Science Journal, 29(3), 323-334.
  12. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95,1-37.
  13. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  14. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott, (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11-34). London, England: Island Press.
  16. Henry, F., & Tator, C. (2002). Discourses of domination: Racial bias in the Canadian Englishlanguage press. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  17. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agenda, alternatives and public policies. New York, NY: Longman.
  19. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The media and the foundations of presidential support: George Bush and the Persian Gulf conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 167-182.
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff's alpha-reliability. Retrieved from
  21. Matthes, J. (2009). What's in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world's leading communication journals, 1990-2005. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349-367.
  22. Sebatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  23. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
  24. Schon, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  25. Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50, 93-109.
  26. Thakur, A. (2013, August 8). Top 7 newspapers known to favor specific political parties in India. Hill Post. Retrieved from
  27. van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London, England: Routledge.
  28. van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87-118. Retrieved from
  29. van Dijk, T. A. (2006) Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115-140. Retrieved from
  30. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78.
  31. Wilson, J. (1973). Introduction to social movements. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  32. Without reservations [Editorial]. (2006, April 29). The Indian Express. Retrieved from