A Study on Indirect Attachment Method of Compensation Materials to Increase Signal Intensity in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

자기공명영상검사 시 신호강도를 높이기 위한 보상물질의 간접부착 방식에 관한 연구

  • 손순룡 (원광보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2017.03.20
  • Accepted : 2017.03.31
  • Published : 2017.07.28


Previously, studies on compensation material to increase the signal intensity have been conducted which does not affect the reading of images. However, the compensation material has a concern on patient infection as it is attached directly on the skin. Therefore, in this study, we tested an indirect attachment of the compensation material as an alternative method of the direct attachment. The silicon compensation material was fabricated in the form of a cylindrical bar and attached to each element of the 8 channel head coil. Then the signal intensities of the water phantom pre and post application of the silicon were measured. T1 and T2-weighted images were acquired using an 8-channel head coil and a 3.0T superconducting MRI. Signal intensities were measured by using an image measuring program. Paired t-test was used to verify if there were significant differences. The signal intensity before application of the silicon was significantly increased by 3.39% and 2.62% in T1 and T2 weighted images, respectively. Although the indirect attachment method had a limitation to completely replace the existing method, it was considered to be useful in patients with infectious diseases such as diabetic complications since it had a meaningful improvement in signal intensity based on the filling factor increase.


Supported by : 원광보건대학교


  1. V. S. Khoo, "Dearnaley DP, Finnigan DJ, Padhani A, Tanner SF, Leach MO, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning," Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol.42, No.1, pp.1-15, 1997.
  2. E. Plenge, D. H. Poot, M. Bernsen, G. Kotek, G. Houston, P. Wielopolski, L. van der Weerd, W. J. Niessen, and E. Meijering, "Super-resolution methods in MRI: can they improve the trade-off between resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and acquisition time," Magnetic resonance in medicine, Vol.68, No.6, pp.1983-1993, 2012.
  3. B. M. Dale, M. A. Brown, and R. C. Semelka, MR I: basic principles and applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
  4. B. Tomanek, Innovative mutually inductively coupled radiofrequency coils for magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, 2006.
  5. H. S. Lee, D. C. Woo, K. H. Min, Y. K. Kim, H. K. Lee, and B. Y. Choe, "Development of Solenoid RF Coil for Animal Imaging in 3T High Magnetic Field MRI," Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol.11, No.1, pp.20-26, 2007.
  6. K. W. Choi and S. Y. Son, "A research on improving signal to noise ratio for magnetic resonance imaging through increasing filling factor inside surface coil," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.13, No.11, pp.5299-5304, 2012.
  7. D. K. Seo, S. R. Na, J. H. Park, K. W. Choi, H. B. Lee, and D. K. Han, "Effectiveness of a silicone device for foot MRI in order to obtain homogeneous fat suppression images," Acta Radiologica, Vol.56, No.4, pp.471-476, 2015.
  8. H. Busse, A. Schmitgen, C. Trantakis, R. Schober, T. Kahn, and M. Moche, "Advanced approach for intraoperative MRI guidance and potential benefit for neurosurgical applications," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol.24, No.1, pp.140-151, 2006.
  9. J. S. Lee, E. H. Goo, C. S. Park, S. Y. Lee, and H. J. Lee, "A Study on Compensation for Imaging Qualities Having Artifact with the Change of the Center Frequency Adjustment and Transmission Gain Values at 1.5 Tesla MRI," Korean Journal of Medical Physics, Vol.20, No.4, pp.244-252, 2009.
  10. J. H. Cho, H. K. Lee, and C. S. Park, "The usability of the image according to the frequency encoding gradient direction conversion in fixation using the non magnetic metal screw," Journal of Digital Contents Society, Vol.12, No.1, pp.49-55, 2011.
  11. C. H. Lim and S. J. Bae, "3T MR Spin Echo T1 Weighted Image at Optimization of Flip Angle," Journal of the Korean Society of Radiological Technology, Vol.32, No.2, pp.177-182, 2009.
  12. T. Nakada, "Clinical application of high and ultra high-field MRI," Brain and Development, Vol.29, No.6, pp.325-335, 2007.
  13. B. J. Soher, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle, "A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5 T," Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, Vol.15, No.3, pp.277-290, 2007.
  14. W. A. Willinek and H. H. Schild, "Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5T," European journal of radiology, Vol.65, No.1, pp.2-14, 2008.
  15. K. R. Minard and R. A. Wind, "Solenoidal microcoil design. Part I: Optimizing RF homogeneity and coil dimensions," Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A, Vol.13, No.2, pp.128-142, 2001.<128::AID-CMR1002>3.0.CO;2-8
  16. H. Lee, H. Moon, Y. Chang, and K. S. Hong, "The Effect of Coating Material of Copper-wire RF Coil on the Signal-to-Noise Ratio in MR Images, Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic," Resonance in Medicine, Vol.13, No.2, pp.171-176, 2009.