Study on the Establishment of the Act on the Prevention and Protection of Technology Leakage

'기술유출방지 및 보호지원에 관한 법률'제정에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.04.11
  • Accepted : 2017.05.08
  • Published : 2017.07.28


South Korea needs reorganization of dispute resolution system due to the frequent occurrence of a case that trade secret or technique are leaked. First, the distributed various laws are established and enforced by enacting and enforcing individual laws. Therefore, the redundancy problems, the collision of individual laws, the decline in diversity, integrity, and connectivity are issues. An independent legal system is needed by Act on the Prevention and Protection of Technology Leakage. Thereby, The support system of technological protection that is sprayed in government departments such as the Small and Medium Business Administration, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Patent Office, the Fair Trade Commission, the Trade Committee, the National Police Agency, and the Spy Agency integrates and unifies institutionally, and it is necessary to advance a policy with functional division. Second, the Patent Tribunal, the Invention Promotion Act, the Industrial Property Right Dispute Mediation Committee by the patent law, the Industrial Technical Dispute Mediation Committee on the Industrial Technology Outflow Prevention and Protection Law and the Medium and Small Firm Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Committee on Small Business Technology Protection Support Law are installed. However, since it established the integrated law on the Act on the Prevention and Protection of Technology Leakage, it is desirable to set the merged operation of establishment on the Technical Dispute Mediation Committee under the Small and Medium Business Administration or the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.


  1. 김동완(국회의원), 중소기업 기술유출의 현황과 과제, 국정감사 정책자료집(1), p.14, 2013.10.15.
  2. 대한상공회의소, 국내기업의 지식재산유출 피해 실태와 정책과제, 2013.12.6.
  3. 특허청, 우리기업의 영업비밀 피해 실태조사 보고서, 2013(11).
  4. 강창일(국회의원), 중소기업 기술.인력탈취 이대로는 안된다-중소기업 기술.인력 탈취 실태 및 개선방안, 2011년 국정감사 정책자료집, pp.17-19, 2011(9).
  5. 이헌재(국회의원), 특허청에 대한 국회 산업통상자원위원회의 국정감사, 2015.9.15.
  6. 중소기업신문, "특허소송도 '유전무죄'${\cdots}$"자금력 달리는 中企, 대기업에게 전패"," 2015.09.15.
  7. 기술보호 통합포털 울타리( 참조.
  8. 구태언, 기술감정, 법률신문, 2013.6.3.
  9. 손승우, 핵심기술 보유기업의 위기대응을 위한 법적 대처방안 연구, 한국산업기술진흥원, p.205, 2011
  10. 보험연구원, 중소기업 기술유출피해보험제도 도입 타당성 연구, 중소기업기술정보진흥원, p.34, 2011(9).
  11. 송윤아, 지식재산권 소송보험 도입 3년 평가와 과제, 보험연구원, p.12, 2013.
  12. 국신욱, "중소기업 기술유출방지를 위한 법제연구," 산업재산권 통권 제46호, pp.233-234, 2015.
  13. 중소기업청(이규호:과제 책임자), 수탁 중소기업의 기술보호를 위한 제도적 개선방안 연구, 연구보고서, p.182, 2011(12).
  14. 중소기업청 대.중소기업협력재단, 중소기업 기술유출 사례분석 및 정책지원방안, 연구보고서, 2016.