Effect of Design variables of Rail Surface Measuring Device on Acoustic Roughness and Spectral Analysis

레일표면 측정장치의 설계변수가 음향조도 스펙트럼 분석에 미치는 영향

  • Jeong, Wootae (Korea Railroad Research Institute, Transportation Environmental Research Team) ;
  • Jeon, Seungwoo (Korea Railroad Research Institute, Transportation Environmental Research Team) ;
  • Jeong, Dahae (Department of Robotics & Virtual Engineering, University of Science & Technology) ;
  • Choi, Han Shin (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2017.06.01
  • Accepted : 2017.07.28
  • Published : 2017.08.31


Spectrum level for the acoustic roughness of wheels and rail surface should be periodically maintained under the limitation of ISO to reduce rolling noise of railway vehicles. Thus, in maintaining railway track, displacement sensor-based measuring devices are broadly used to measure the surface roughness and to perform spectral analysis. However, these measuring devices cause unexpected measuring errors since the displacement sensors are fixed at moving platforms and the main frame produces pitching motion during measurement. To increase the accuracy of the measured values, this paper has investigated the effects of design variables such as wheel base, additional wheels, and elastic deformation of wheels on the surface roughness and acoustic roughness spectrum.


Supported by : 국토교통부


  1. W. Jeong, S. Jang, H. Koh (2015) Measuring technique for acoustic roughness of rail surface with homogeneous displacement sensors, The Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 16(11), pp. 7941-7948.
  2. T. Kitagawa (2009) The influence of wheel and track parameters on rolling noise, QR of RTRI, 50(1), pp. 32-38.
  3. S. L. Grassie (2012) Rail irregularities, corrugation and acoustic roughness: characteristics, significance and effects of reprofiling, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 226(5), pp. 542-557.
  4. S.L. Grassie, M.J. Saxon, J.D. Smith (1999) Measurement of longitudinal rail irregularities and criteria for acceptable grinding, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 227(5), pp. 949-964.
  5. G. Desanghere, T. Vanhonacker (2007) Development and Validation of a rail surface analyse for accurate quantification and evaluation of rail corrugation and track work acceptance after acoustic grinding, Inter-Noise, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 276-283.
  6. R. J. Diehl, P. Holm (2006) Roughness measurement - Have the necessities changed?, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 293, pp. 777-783.
  7. W. Jeong, S. Jeon, S. Jang, H. Koh (2015) Accuracy improvement in measuring rail surface roughness with multiple displacement sensors, Proc. of Conference on Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, Daejeon, pp. 87-88.
  8. S. Jang and J. Ryue (2013) Study on the rolling noise model using an analysis of wheel and rail vibration characteristics, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 16(3), pp. 175-182.
  9. J.W. Park, D.Y. Sung, Y.G. Park (2017) Correlation analysis between dynamic wheel-rail force and rail grinding, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 20(2), pp. 234-240.
  10. H. Tanaka and A. Shimizu (2016) Practical application of portable trolley for the continuous measurement of rail surface roughness for rail corrugation maintenance, QR of RTRI, 57(2), pp. 118-124.