Functional analysis of SH3 domain containing ring finger 2 during the myogenic differentiation of quail myoblast cells

  • Kim, Si Won (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Hyo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Tae Sub (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.11
  • 심사 : 2016.12.21
  • 발행 : 2017.08.01


Objective: Owing to the public availability of complete genome sequences, including avian species, massive bioinformatics analyses may be conducted for computational gene prediction and the identification of gene regulatory networks through various informatics tools. However, to evaluate the biofunctional activity of a predicted target gene, in vivo and in vitro functional genomic analyses should be a prerequisite. Methods: Due to a lack of quail genomic sequence information, we first identified the partial genomic structure and sequences of the quail SH3 domain containing ring finger 2 (SH3RF2) gene. Subsequently, SH3RF2 was knocked out using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/Cas9 technology and single cell-derived SH3RF2 mutant sublines were established to study the biofunctional activity of SH3RF2 in quail myoblast (QM7) cells during muscle differentiation. Results: Through a T7 endonuclease I assay and genotyping analysis, we established an SH3RF2 knockout (KO) QM7#4 subline with 61 and 155 nucleotide deletion mutations in SH3RF2. After the induction of myotube differentiation, the expression profiles were analyzed and compared between regular QM7 and SH3RF2 KO QM7#4 cells by global RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. Conclusion: We did not detect any statistically significant role of SH3RF2 during myotube differentiation in QM7 myoblast cells. However, additional experiments are necessary to examine the biofunctional activity of SH3RF2 in cell proliferation and muscle growth.


연구 과제 주관 기관 : Rural Development Administration


  1. Boshart M, Weber F, Jahn G, et al. A very strong enhancer is located upstream of an immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus. Cell 1985;41:521-30.
  2. Kim DW, Uetsuki T, Kaziro Y, et al. Use of the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter as a versatile and efficient expression system. Gene 1990;91:217-23.
  3. Alexopoulou AN, Couchman JR, Whiteford JR. The CMV early enhancer/chicken beta actin (CAG) promoter can be used to drive transgene expression during the differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells into vascular progenitors. BMC Cell Biol 2008;9:2.
  4. Park TS, Han JY. piggyBac transposition into primordial germ cells is an efficient tool for transgenesis in chickens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:9337-41.
  5. Miyazaki J, Takaki S, Araki K, et al. Expression vector system based on the chicken beta-actin promoter directs efficient production of interleukin-5. Gene 1989;79:269-77.
  6. Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki L. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 1991;108:192-9.
  7. Lee F, Mulligan R, Berg P, Ringold G. Glucocorticoids regulate expression of dihydrofolate reductase cDNA in mouse mammary tumour virus chimaeric plasmids. Nature 1981;294:228-32.
  8. Mayo KE, Warren R, Palmiter RD. The mouse metallothionein-I gene is transcriptionally regulated by cadmium following transfection into human or mouse cells. Cell 1982;29:99-108.
  9. Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1992;89:5547-51.
  10. Mullick A, Xu Y, Warren R, et al. The cumate gene-switch: a system for regulated expression in mammalian cells. BMC Biotechnol 2006; 6:43.
  11. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013;339:819-23.
  12. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013;339:823-6.
  13. Kawahara-Miki R, Sano S, Nunome M, et al. Next-generation sequencing reveals genomic features in the Japanese quail. Genomics 2013; 101:345-53.
  14. Wilhelm M, Kukekov NV, Schmit TL, et al. Sh3rf2/POSHER protein promotes cell survival by ring-mediated proteasomal degradation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase scaffold POSH (Plenty of SH3s) protein. J Biol Chem 2012;287:2247-56.
  15. Kim TW, Kang YK, Park ZY, et al. SH3R$F_2$ functions as an oncogene by mediating PAK4 protein stability. Carcinogenesis 2014;35:624-34.
  16. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 2010;464:587-91.
  17. Orphanides G, Wu WH, Lane WS, Hampsey M, Reinberg D. The chromatin-specific transcription elongation factor FACT comprises human SPT16 and SSRP1 proteins. Nature 1999;400:284-8.
  18. Saunders A, Werner J, Andrulis ED, et al. Tracking FACT and the RNA polymerase II elongation complex through chromatin in vivo. Science 2003;301:1094-6.
  19. Wittmeyer J, Formosa T. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase alpha catalytic subunit interacts with Cdc68/Spt16 and with Pob3, a protein similar to an HMG1-like protein. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:4178-90.
  20. Kumari A, Mazina OM, Shinde U, Mazin AV, Lu H. A role for SSRP1 in recombination-mediated DNA damage response. J Cell Biochem 2009;108:508-18.
  21. Zeng SX, Li Y, Jin Y, et al. Structure-specific recognition protein 1 facilitates microtubule growth and bundling required for mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:935-47.

피인용 문헌

  1. Molecular characterization of the apoptosis-related SH3RF1 and SH3RF2 genes and their association with exercise performance in Arabian horses vol.14, pp.1, 2018,
  2. Muscle differentiation induced up-regulation of calcium-related gene expression in quail myoblasts vol.31, pp.9, 2018,
  3. Forkhead box O3 promotes cell proliferation and inhibits myotube differentiation in chicken myoblast cells vol.60, pp.1, 2019,