An Analysis on Educational Experience of Competent Engineering Students based on Personal Investment Theory

우수한 공대생의 교육 활동 참여 분석: 개인투자이론을 기초로

  • Received : 2017.07.03
  • Accepted : 2017.07.31
  • Published : 2017.07.31

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the educational experiences of competent engineering students and finding the reason why they invest their time and efforts engaging in school activities. Five students with high GPA, high K-CESA scores and successful employment or entrance test scores, participated in the survey and the interview. In checking their responses, their activities' records were gathered from school DB. According to the modified framework based on the personal investment theory, the interviews, survey and DB records were analyzed on the sense of self, the social cultural environment, and pattern of behaviors in schools. The competent engineering students are able to manage themselves, in maintaining a good relationship with the collegiate, and in having high self-efficiency. They also tend to put effort into their studies and participate in inbound and outbound school activities. At the last part, freshmen foundation, relationship within college, students' activity related future career, economic stability during studies are suggested for supporting students in universities.

Keywords

Engineering Students;Educational Experience;Personal Investment Theory;Student Support

References

  1. 최정윤 외(2016). 대학의 교수.학습 질 제고 전략 탐색 연구 (IV) : 대학 유형별 교수.학습 역량 평가체제 구축 : 4년제, 전문대학. 한국교육개발원. RR 2016-17.
  2. 유기웅 외(2014). 질적 연구 방법의 이해. 서울: 박영사.
  3. 유현숙 외(2011). 한국 대학생의 학습과정 분석연구(II). 한국교육개발원. 연구보고 RR 2011-13.43.
  4. 진미석 외(2013). 2013년도 대학생 핵심역량 진단체제(K-CESA) 구축 사업, 한국직업능력개발원. 수탁사업 13-18.
  5. 홍성연.김인수(2016). 대학의 지원과 자기결정성 요인이 신입생의 대학교육성과에 미치는 영향. 청소년학연구, 23(12): 453-479.
  6. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  7. Astin, A. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40 (5): 518-530.
  8. Braskamp, L. A., Trautvetter, L. C., & K. Ward. (2006). Putting students first: How colleges develop students purposefully. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
  9. Braskamp, L. A. (2009). Applying personal investment theory to better understand student development. Culture, self, and motivation: Essays in honor of Martin L. Maehr, 21-38.
  10. Maehr, M. L., & Braskamp, L. A. (1986). The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  11. Pace, C. R. (1987). Good things go together. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
  12. Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54 (6): 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단