• Published : 2017.06.15


The corridors to the north and south of the $Takl{\bar{a}}m{\bar{a}}k{\bar{a}}n$ (塔克拉瑪干 Ta-ke-la-ma-gan) Desert are the most important regions for cultural confluence on the Silk Road, where caravans made it to the Chinese capital or the Korean Peninsula by the northern road, through the city of Turfan, or the southern path of Khutan. Being an important part of the Silk Road in the course of history, this region was heavily influenced by the cultures of various nations and ethnic communities whose merchants utilized the road to advance their business. The region's language, writing system and literary structure were also affected, so much so that in the course of its tumultuous history, many words, phrases and terms belonging to neighboring cultures found their way into the region, leaving their mark on its linguistic structure. Of the cultural exchanges that took place between the peoples of the region, conspicuous traces can be seen in the architecture, music, literature, texts, and inscriptions. Located in the Turfan region, the minaret of Su Gong (蘇公 Su Gong ) is host to an inscription which bears many signs of such exchanges. As so far no independent research has been conducted to identify the cultural, literary and structural features conveyed in this inscription, the present paper is an attempt to study the inscription in terms of the script, language and syntax in order to unravel the effects of cultures prevalent on the Silk Road on this particular inscription. This study mainly aims to investigate the linguistic structure of the inscription and the impact of the Persian language on Silk Road culture. In fact, we approach the inscription as a symbol of cultural exchange on the Silk Road and will focus on the tradition of Persian inscription-making which affected the Turfan inscription.


  1. Al-Sama'ani, Abu Saeed Abdulkarim Al-Tamimi. 1962. Al-Ansab. Abdurrahman Bin Yahya Al-Yamanim, eds., Beirut: Dar al-Torath.
  2. Al-Tabari, Muḥammad Bin Jarir. 1967. Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk (History of the Prophets and Kings), Beirut: Dar al-Torath.
  3. Encyclopedia Iranica, online edition. 2016. Available at
  4. Guangda, Zhang, and Rong, Xinjiang. 1998. "A Concise History of the Turfan Oasis and Its Exploration." Asia Major, Third series, Vol. 11, No. 2: 13-36.
  5. Kim, Kwangmi. 2012. "Profit and Protection: Emin Khwaja and the Qing Conquest of Central Asia, 1759-1777." The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 71, and No. 3: 603-626.
  6. Pelliot, Paul. 1916. "Le Cha-tcheou-tou-fou-t'ou-king et la colonie Sogdienne de la religion du Lob Nor." Journal Asiatic: 111-123.
  7. Rong, Xinjiang. 1998. "A Persian Nestorian family in Tang China." In Collection Papers of the 2th Iranology Conference. Ye Yiliang, ed. Peking University Press: 238-257.
  8. Report of a mission to Yarkand in 1873 under the command of Sir T.D. Forsyth, K.C.S.I., C.B., Bengal civil service, with historical and geographical information regarding the possessions of the Ameer of Yarkand (1875), Calcutta, Printed at the Foreign Department Press.
  9. Skaff, Jonathan Karam. 2003. "The Sogdian Trade Diaspora in East Turkestan during the Seventh and Eighth Centuries." Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 46, No. 4: 475-524.
  10. Sundermann, W. 1981. Mitteliranische manichäische Texte kirchengeschichtlichen Inhalts, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
  11. Liu, Yingsheng. 2010. "A Lingua Franca along the Silk Road: Persian Language in China between 14th and the 16th Centuries." Aspects of the Maritime Silk Road: From the Persian Gulf to the East China Sea. Ralph Kauz, ed. Harrassowits Verlag: Wiesbaden: 87-95.
  12. Yoshida, Yutaka. 2006. "Personal names, Sogdian in Chinese sources." Encyclopaedia Iranica, online edition, available at