The Effect of Identification Framing as Crisis Response Strategy

위기대응 전략으로서 정체성 프레이밍 효과

  • 조승호 (숭실대학교 글로벌통상학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.20
  • Accepted : 2018.01.19
  • Published : 2018.01.28


The current study challenges to suggest an umbrella strategy applied to different type of crisis, which is different from normative principle in crisis communication. The umbrella or comprehensive strategy in this study is identification framing. Identification framing is strategic message for organizational identification, which is close to social identification. The current study employed experimental design manipulating crisis types, crisis response types, and identification framing. The crisis types were internal versus external crisis, crisis responses were denial versus apology, and using identification framing $2{\times}2{\times}2$ factorial design were used. Two hundreds forty students participated in the experiment. The result showed the significant effectiveness of identification framing in different crisis types and crisis responses.


Identification Framing;Crisis Communication;Crisis Response Strategy;Crisis Type


Supported by : 한국연구재단


  1. W. Timothy Coombs, "The value of communication during a crisis: Insights from strategic communication research," Business Horizons, Vol.58, No.2, pp.141-148, 2015.
  2. William L. Benoit, "Image repair discourse and crisis communication," Public relations review Vol.23, No.2, pp.177-186, 1997.
  3. W. Timothy Coombs, "Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory," Corporate reputation review, Vol.10, No.3, pp.163-176, 2007.
  4. W. Timothy Coombs and J. Holladay Sherry, "Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory," Management Communication Quarterly, Vol.16, No.2, pp.165-186, 2002.
  5. Jeffrey L. Bradford and Dennis E. Garrett, "The effectiveness of corporate communicative responses to accusations of unethical behavior," Journal of Business ethics, Vol.14, No.11, pp.875-892, 1995.
  6. Kevin M. Coombs, "Quantitative proteomics of complex mixtures," Expert Review of Proteomics, Vol.8, No.5, pp.659-677, 2011.
  7. Daviden L. Sturges, "Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival," Management communication quarterly, Vol.7, No.3, pp.297-316, 1994.
  8. K. Hallahan, "Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations," Journal of public relations research, Vol.11, No.3, pp.205-242, 1999.
  9. G. Bateson, Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology, University of Chicago Press, 1972.
  10. E. Goffman, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Harvard University Press, 1974.
  11. Linda L. Putnam and Majia Holmer, "Framing, reframing, and issue development," Sage Publication, 1992.
  12. D. Tannen, "What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations," Framing in discourse, Vol.14, p.56, 1993.
  13. S. Ghanem, "Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting," Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory, pp.3-14, 1997.
  14. Irwin P. Levin, Sandra L. Schneider, and Gary J. Gaeth, "All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects," Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol.76, No.2, pp.149-188, 1998.
  15. Al Ries and Jack Trout, "Positioning: The battle for your mind," McGraw-Hill, 1986.
  16. B. Weiner, "An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion," Psychological review, Vol.92, No.4, p.548, 1985.
  17. B. Weiner, Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach, Psychology Press, 2006.
  18. K. Murphy, "A brief introduction to graphical models and Bayesian networks," 1998.
  19. T. Skillington, "Politics and the struggle to define: A discourse analysis of the framing strategies of competing actors in a 'new' participatory forum," British Journal of Sociology, pp.493-513, 1997.
  20. F. Heider, "A conversation with Fritz Heider," New directions in attribution research, Vol.1, pp.47-61, 1976.
  21. Alan L. Sillars, "Attribution and communication: Are people" naive scientists" or just naive," Social cognition and communication, pp.73-106, 1982.
  22. Catherine S. Elliott and Donald M. Hayward, "The expanding definition of framing and its particular impact on economic experimentation," The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol.27, No.2, pp.229-243, 1998.
  23. H. J. Kim and Glen T. Cameron, "Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics' response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response," Communication Research, Vol.38, No.6, pp.826-855, 2011.
  24. Tajfel, Henri, Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology, CUP Archive, 1981.
  25. H. Tajfel, "Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology," The social dimension, Vol.2, pp.695-715, 1984.
  26. Victor Witter Turner, From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play, Paj Publications, 1982.
  27. Bryan S. Turner, Body and society, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1984.
  28. G. Cheney and Phillip K. Tompkins, "Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment," Communication Studies, Vol.38, No.1, pp.1-15, 1987.
  29. W. Timothy Coombs, "An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation," Journal of public relations research, Vol.10, No.3, pp.177-191, 1998.
  30. W. Timothy Coombs and Sherry J. Holladay, "An exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crises," The effect of affect in organizational settings. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.263-280, 2005.