Model Development of Capstone Design for Technological and Humanities Convergence by Using Idea Box

아이디어박스를 활용한 기술인문융합형 캡스톤디자인 모형개발

  • Received : 2018.10.02
  • Accepted : 2018.11.23
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

In many universities, the Capstone Design course aims to educate creativity, teamwork and leadership, and ultimately aims to cultivate practitioners with practical ability required in the industry. Since the introduction of capstone design as a regular course, it has spread not only to engineering but also to the humanities and social sciences. A typical capstone design is usually carried out within a limited range of schedules and budgets within the scope of a major and a subject. In the case of a special-purpose capstone design, it is necessary to find out excellent items aiming at start-up and commercialization at an early stage, It contributes to the achievement of international convention participation, start-up and commercialization. The teaching styles of capstone design such as multidisciplinary capstone design, fusion capstone design, and global capstone design are developed and operated in various ways. Depending on each type, objectives, curriculum, scope of participation, operation method, performance and so on. In the case of capstone design, it is contributing to increase the achievements such as participation in international conventions, establishment of business and commercialization by early detection of excellent items aiming at start-up and commercialization, development and establishment of support process. Technological and Humanities Convergence Capstone Design Moel is named as the process of designing a four-level idea called "Idea Factory-based Technology-Humannities Fusion Capstone Design Process", and it is used to generate ideas, elaborate ideas, advanced ideas, and commercialization.

Keywords

Capstone Design Model;Ideafactory;Ideabox;Ideacard;Technological and Humanities Convergence

References

  1. 교육부, 한국연구재단(2017), 2016 대학 산학협력활동 조사보고서
  2. 권순각, 김성우, 박유현(2013), "지속적인 기업체 연계 프로젝트 기반의 캡스톤 설계 운영시스템", 공학교육연구, 16(3), 61-68.
  3. 김나영, 이소영(2017), 공과대학 캡스톤 디자인의 학습성과에 대한 자기조절학습전략의 매개효과 검증, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 20 (5), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2017.20.5.34
  4. 김상균(2011), 캡스톤디자인 교과목의 학습성과 팡가체계 개발, 12(8), Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation society, 3452-3457. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.8.3452
  5. 김웅섭(2010), 프로그램 학습성과 향상을 위한 형성평가 중심의 캡스톤디자인 교과목 설계, 공학교육연구, 13(1), 62-69.
  6. 김지은, 이성주(2016), 특허 키워드 분석을 활용한 기술인문융합 현황 분석, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42 (3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.3.231
  7. 김지은, 장영수, 이성주(2014), 국내 중소기업의 기술인문융합 현황분석, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 40 (5), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2014.40.5.451
  8. 박수홍, 정주영, 류영호(2008), 창의적 공학교육을 위한 캡스톤 디자인(Capstone Design) 교수활동지원모형 개발, 수산해양교육연구, 20(2), 184-200.
  9. 변문경(2018), 캡스톤 디자인 수업에서 학생들의 주제 결정패턴 탐색, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 21 (1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2018.21.1.14
  10. 산업자원부 보도자료(2005), 창의적설계 인력양성사업 추진.
  11. 서연화, 심현애(2016), 시각디자인 전공 학생들을위한 글로벌 캡스톤디자인 프로그램 개발 및 효과 분석, 한국기초조형학회, 17(2), 183-194.
  12. 송동주(2003), 공학교육의 문제점과 개선 방향에 대하여, 공학교육과 기술, 10(2), 85-92.
  13. 윤명한(2014), 디자인분야의 캡스톤디자인 적용사례 및 성과 고찰, 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 12(12), 113
  14. 이강우, 신연순(2009), 교육목표와 학습성과 평가를 통한 프로그램 운영 방안에 대한 연구, 공학교육연구, 12(2), 71-82.
  15. 이태식, 전영준, 이동욱, 장병철(2009), 공학대학 캡스톤 디자인(창의적 공학 설계) 교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사, 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50.
  16. 이희원, 김성환, 박근, 김정엽(2010), 캡스톤디자인 교과목 기반의 프로그램 학습성과 평가 연구, 공학교육연구, 13(6), 143-151.