DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Relation between Indexicality of Digital Cinema and Evolution of Cinematic Language

디지털 시네마의 지표성과 영화언어의 진화와의 관계에 관한 연구

  • Jeong, Minah (Department of Theatre & Cinema, Sungkyul University)
  • 정민아 (성결대학교 연극영화학부)
  • Received : 2018.05.23
  • Accepted : 2018.07.20
  • Published : 2018.07.28

Abstract

The digital technologies brought a structural transformation to cinema, have lead a change in the way of existence of an assembly of images called cinema, and have shared expression methods with new-media. To look into how in terms of cinema style of the film era and the digital era are different, this article will focus on the matter of 'indexicality.' From the point of view of perceptive realism the discourses on digital image deconstruct the dichotomy between illusionism and classical realism. Therefore the actuality of an image does not depend on only indexicality but has much to do with how the viewers fundamentally perceive the image. In this age of digital cinema it does not matter to distinct a composite-image from a reality-image. This article inquires the relation of indexicality, the world and digital images in digital cinema on the level of reception, and reconsider in terms of image production.

Keywords

Convergence;digital cinema;cinema technology;indexicality;realism;cinematic language

References

  1. S. Sontag. (1996. 2. 25). "The Decay of Cinema" New York Times. https://archive.nytimes.com
  2. S. Shaviro. (2010). Post-Cinematic Affect, Winchester, UK: Zero-Books.
  3. D. N. Rodowick. (2007). The Virtual Life of Film, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. S. Prince. (1996). Thru Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images, and Film Theory, Film Quarterly, 49(3), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1213468
  5. T. Gunning. (2007). Moving away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality, Differences, 18(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2006-022
  6. T. Binkley. (1990). The Quickening of Galatea: Virtual Creation without Tools or Media, Art Journal, 49(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1990.10792696
  7. N. Rombes. (2009). Cinema in the Digital Age, New York: Wallflower Press.
  8. T. Druckrey. (1994). From Dada to Digital: Montage in the Twentieth Century, Aperture, 136, 4-7.
  9. A. Darley. (2000). Visual Digital Culture: Surface Play and Spectacle in New Media Genre, London and New York: Rutledge.
  10. J. Johnson-Smith. (2005). American Science Fiction TV: Star Trek, Stargate and Beyond, London: I. B. Tauris.
  11. B. Gaut. (2010). A Philosophy of Cinematic Art, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. P. Willemen. (2013). Indexicality, Fantasy and the Digital, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(1), 110-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2013.746775
  13. S. Prince. (2012). Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality, New Brunswick, New Jersey and London: Rutgers University Press.
  14. S. H. Ahn. (2017. 8. 29). The Evolution of Digital Image through War for the Planet of Apes, Cine21, http://www.cine21.com
  15. T. Gunning. (1989). An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator, Art and Text, 34, 31-45.