DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Translation, Cross Cultural Adaptation of Whiplash Disability Questionnaire: Pilot Study

Whiplash Disability Questionnaire의 한국어 번역 및 문화적 개작: 예비 연구

  • Received : 2018.06.14
  • Accepted : 2018.07.02
  • Published : 2018.07.31

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to provide more whiplash injury-specific measurement tools for Korean patients by measuring the validity and reliability of Korean version of Whiplash Disability Questionnaire (WDQ). Methods Bilingual clinicians translated the original WDQ into Korean. After consensus conference between researchers, it was back-translated into English. The pre-final version was completed and administered to 71 hospitalized patients diagnosed with whiplash injury. Validity was evaluated by concurrent validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The Korean WDQ showed good reliability with high internal consistency and intra-class correlation coefficient (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=0.96$, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.82). Concurrent validity demonstrated positive correlations between Neck Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and WDQ. Conclusions The Korean version of WDQ is a valid and reliable tool for use as a measurement of whiplash injury in Korean patients, and it will be a very useful evaluation tool for both clinicians and researchers.

Keywords

Whiplash injuries;Questionnaires;Korean traditional medicine;Reliability and Validity

References

  1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(8 Suppl):1S-73S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199504151-00001
  2. Van Oosterwijck J, Nijs J, Meeus M, Paul L. Evidence for central sensitization in chronic whiplash: a systematic literature review. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(3):299-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00193.x
  3. Korea Road Traffic Authority. Estimation and Assessment of Traffic Accident-Incurred Costs in 2016 (in Korean) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Jun 12]. Available from: URL: http://taas.koroad.or.kr/sta/acs/exs/typical.do?menuId=WEB_KMP_OVT_UAS_ASA.
  4. Pinfold M, Niere KR, O'Leary EF, Hoving JL, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity and internal consistency of a whiplash-specific disability measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(3):263-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000107238.15526.4C
  5. Stupar M, Cote P, Beaton DE, Boyle E, Cassidy JD. A test-retest reliability study of the whiplash disability questionnaire in patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(9):629-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.10.003
  6. Schuster C, McCaskey M, Ettlin T. German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the whiplash disability questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-45
  7. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  8. Song KJ, Choi BW, Kim SJ, Yoon SJ. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2009;44(3):350-59. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2009.44.3.350
  9. Koh SB, Chang SJ, Kang MG, Cha BS, Park JK. Reliability and validity on measurement instrument for health status assessment in occupational workers. Korean J Prev Med. 1997;30(2):251-66.
  10. Sterling M, Kenardy J. Physical and psychological aspects of whiplash: important considerations for primary care assessment. Man Ther. 2008;13(2):93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2007.11.003
  11. Wiangkham T, Duda J, Haque S, Madi M, Rushton A. The effectiveness of conservative management for acute whiplash associated disorder (WAD) II: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133415
  12. Jo HJ, Kwon MS, Kim JH, Jo DH, Choi JE, Han JS, Lee SM, Lee SH, Nam SS. A review of the assessment tools in clinical trials for patients injured in traffic accidents in South Korea. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture and Moxibustion Society. 2016;33(4):15-31.
  13. Carlesso LC, Walton DM, MacDermid JC. Reflecting on whiplash associated disorder through a QoL lens: an option to advance practice and research. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(13):1131-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.632467
  14. Stupar M, Cote P, Beaton DE, Boyle E, Cassidy JD. Structural and construct validity of the whiplash disability questionnaire in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders. Spine J. 2015;15(11):2369-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.006
  15. Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2012:377-78.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 청연의학연구소