DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application of Physical Activity Planning Behavior Theory Model of Rehabilitation Center Participants

재활센터 이용자의 신체활동 계획행동이론모형 적용 연구

Lee, Jong-Bok;Kim, Do-Jin
이종복;김도진

  • Received : 2019.01.07
  • Accepted : 2019.02.20
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the physical activity planning behavior theory model of rehabilitation center users. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was conducted for sports athletes who visited the sports rehabilitation hospital and rehabilitation center in the metropolitan area. A total of 203 questionnaires were used for the actual analysis. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. In this way, we confirmed that intention has a significant direct effect on the behavior in the application of the physical activity planning theoretical model based on the social cognitive theory of rehabilitation center participants.

Keywords

Convergence;Rehabilitation center;Physical activity;Planing behavior theory;Social cognitive theory

References

  1. Eun, J. W. (2016). Psychological basic of participation culture in rehabilitation sports: Structural factor reorganization of continuance intention to participate in rehabilitation exercise. Korea science & Art forum, 25, 263-271. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2016.09.25.263
  2. Jang, C. O., Kim, J. M., Kim D. J. (2017). Basic research for the development of Korea workers physical activity practice models. The Korea journal of sports science. 25(6), 1487-1499.
  3. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1991). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
  5. Yoo, J., Kim, Y. J(2002). Analyses of theoretical models for exercise adherence. Korean journal of sport psychology, 13(3), 127-139.
  6. Yoo, J., Lee, S. A. (2008). Analyses of psycho-social determinants in processes of exercise behaviors for older adults. Journal of the Korean Gerontological society, 28(4), 1213-1225.
  7. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Tovard an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390
  8. Ajzen, I. (2002) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ikg/zick/ajzen%20construction%20a%20tpb%20questionnaire.
  9. Godin, G., & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 10(3), 141-146.
  10. Lee, K. H., Kim, B. J., An, J. D. (2004). Sports psychology test handbook. Rainbow press.
  11. Kim, Y. H. (2002). Adolescent’ stages of change, decision balance, self-efficacy in exercise: Application of transtheoretical model. Korean journal of sport psychology, 13(3), 1-19.
  12. Ajzen, I. (1988). From intentions to actions. In I. Ajzen(Ed), Attitude, personality, and behavior. London: Open University Press.
  13. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  14. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 37, 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  15. Bandura, A. (1996). Ontological and epistemological terrains revisited. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(96)00049-3

Acknowledgement

Supported by : BUCHEON UNIVERSITY