Fair Assessment Method Reflecting Individual Ability in Capstone Design Course

캡스톤 디자인 수업에서 개인 능력을 반영하는 공정한 평가 방법

Kim, Jongwan
김종완

  • Received : 2019.01.03
  • Accepted : 2019.02.16
  • Published : 2019.03.31

Abstract

Capstone design is a subject taught in a setting where students gather in a team, decide on their own selected topic, and collaborate with one another to perform a project. A fair assessment is very important in a team project-based capstone design course for students. Many instructors agree that harmonizing creative evaluation and outcome assessment is hard in capstone design class. In also, it is not easy to assess students' individual efforts and achievements fairly in accordance with team-based assessment practices. To resolve this issue in this paper, we have surveyed various engineering design education methodologies, and have modelled existing evaluating elements into a modified creative process and outcome assessment framework for team project assessment. In particular, we focused on a method of fairly assigning credits by combining team based and individual-level assessments. Analyzing students' achievement and grade evaluation and verifying the validity of the proposed method was performed.

Keywords

Capstone design;Team-based assessment;Individual-level assessment;Fair assessment

References

  1. Horowitz, R. (2001). From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 steps. https://triz-journal.com/triz-asit-4-steps/
  2. Hwang, S. (2016). Relationship between Peer- and Self-Evaluation in Team Based Learning Class for Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 19 (5), pp. 3-12.
  3. Kilpatrick, D.J. et al. (2001). Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes. Journal of Accounting Education. 19 (3), pp. 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00021-5
  4. Kim, J. (2014). An assessment method to evaluate team project based engineering design. Proc. of Int'l Conf. on Computer Science & Education, pp.257-260.
  5. Kim, J. (2016). A Team Project Based Assessment Method for Engineering Design Course. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. 11 (6), pp. 159-170. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2016.11.10.15 https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2016.11.10.15
  6. Kim, J. (2018). Fair Assessment for Team Project Engineering Design Course. Convergence Research Letter. 4 (4), pp. 201-204.
  7. Kim, J.H. (2018). A Mathematical Model for Balanced Team Formation in Capstone Design Class. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 21 (4), pp. 28-34.
  8. Lee, H. W., Kim, S. H., Park, K. & Kim, J. Y. (2010). A Study on the Assessment of Program Outcomes Based on Capstone Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education Research. 13 (6), pp. 143-151. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2010.13.6.143
  9. Mourtous, N. (2012). Defining, teaching, and assessing engineering design skills. Int'l Journal for Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education. 2 (1), pp. 14-30. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012010102 https://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2012010102
  10. Ogot, M. & Okudan, G. E. (2006). Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum. International Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (1), pp. 109-115. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol22-1/IJEE1618.pdf
  11. Park, Y. (2016). Creative Thinking Theory. Korea Standards Association Media, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Platanitis, G. & Pop-Iliev, R. (2010). Establishing fair objectives and grading criteria for undergraduate design engineering project work: an ongoing experiment. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences. 5 (3), pp. 271-288. http://www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol5Issue3/IJRRAS_5_3_09.pdf
  13. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin Books, Limited.
  14. Walvoord, B. E. & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA.
  15. Young, S. F. & Wilson, R. J. (2000). Assessment and Learning: The ICE Approach. Portage & Main Press, Winnipeg, Canada.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Daegu University