DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Price Competition in Duopoly Multimedia Cloud Service Market

복점 멀티미디어 클라우드 서비스 시장에서의 가격 경쟁

  • 이두호 (강원대학교 소프트웨어미디어.산업공학부)
  • Received : 2019.03.19
  • Accepted : 2019.04.17
  • Published : 2019.04.28

Abstract

As an increasing number of cloud service providers begin to provide cloud computing services, they form a competitive market to compete for users. Due to different resource configurations and service workloads, users may observe different response times for their service requests and experience different levels of service quality. To compete for cloud users, it is crucial for each cloud service provider to determine an optimal price that best corresponds to their service qualities while also guaranteeing maximum profit. To achieve this goal, the underlying rationale and characteristics in this competitive market must be clarified. In this paper, we analyze price competition in the multimedia cloud service market with two service providers. We characterize the nature of non-cooperative games in a duopoly multimedia cloud service market with the goal of capturing how each cloud service provider determines its optimal price to compete with the other and maximize its own profit. To do this, we introduce a queueing model to characterize the service process in a multimedia cloud data center. Based on performance measures of the proposed queueing model, we suggest a price competition problem in a duopoly multimedia cloud service market. By solving this problem, we can obtain the optimal equilibrium prices.

Keywords

Price Competition;Multimedia Cloud Service;Duopoly;Profit Maximization;Equilibrium Price

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Multimedia cloud data center architecture

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Queueing model of multimedia cloud data center

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Price competition in duopoly multimedia cloud service market

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Optimal equilibrium arrival rates vs. the number of computing servers in CSP 2’s data center

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Optimal prices vs. the number of computing servers in CSP 2’s data center

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 6. Optimal equilibrium arrival rates vs. the total service request rate

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_79_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 7. Optimal prices vs. the total service request rate

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 강원대학교, 한국연구재단

References

  1. P. Mell and T. Grance, "The NIST definition of cloud computing," National Institute of Standards and Tchnology, Vol.53, No.6, p.50, 2009.
  2. C. N. Hoefer and G. Karagiannis, "Taxonomy of cloud computing services," In: GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2010 IEEE. pp.1345-1350, 2010.
  3. P. Bhaskar, J. Admela, K. Dimitrios, and G. Yves, "Architectural Requirements for Cloud Computing Systems: An Enterprise Cloud Approach," Journal of Grid Computing, Vol.9, No.1, pp.3-26, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-010-9171-y
  4. W. T. Tsai, X. Sun, and J. Balasooriya, "Service-Oriented Cloud Computing Architecture," In: 7th International Conference on Information Technology, 2010.
  5. D. H. Lee, "An Efficient VM-Level Scaling Scheme in an IaaS Cloud Computing System: A Queueing Theory Approach," International Journal of Contents, Vol.13, No.2, pp.29-34, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJOC.2017.13.2.029
  6. R. Shea, J. Liu, E. H. Ngai, and Y. Cui, "Cloud Gaming: Architecture and Performance," IEEE Network, Vol.27, No.4, pp.16-21, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2013.6574660
  7. X. Nan, Y. He, and L. Guan, "Queueing Model Based Resource Optimization for Multimedia Cloud," Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, Vol.25, No.4, pp.928-942, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.02.008
  8. A. Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, and M. Zhang, "CloudCmp: Comparing Public Cloud Providers," In; 10th Annual Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC), pp.1-14, 2010.
  9. I. Petri, O. Rana, and G. C. Silaghi, "SLA as a Complementary Currency in Peer-2-Peer Markets," In: 7th International Conference on Economics of Grids, Clouds, Systems, and Services (GECON), pp.141-152, 2010.
  10. I. Petri, O. F. Rana, Y. Regzui, G. C. Silaghi, and Y. Rezgui, "Risk Assessment in Service Provider Communities," Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol.41, pp.32-43, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2014.08.013
  11. H. Chen and M. Frank, "Monopoly Pricing When Customers Queue," IIE Transactions, Vol.36, No.6, pp.569-581, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170490438690
  12. H. Chen and Y. W. Wan, "Price Competition of Make-to-Order Firms," IIE Transactions, Vol.35, No.9, pp.817-832, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170304412
  13. G. Allon and A. Federgruen, "Competition in Service Industries," Operations Research, Vol.55, No.1, pp.37-55, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0337
  14. J. Anselmi, U. Ayesta, and A. Wierman, "Competition Yields Efficiency in Load Balancing Games," Performance Evaluation, Vol.68, No.11, pp.986-1001, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2011.07.005
  15. Y. Feng, B. Li, and B. Li, "Price Competition in an Oligopoly Market with Multiple IaaS Cloud Providers," IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol.63, No.1, pp.59-73, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2013.153
  16. C. Kilcioglu and J. M. Rao, "Competition on Price and Quality in Cloud Computing," In: 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp.1123-1132, 2016.
  17. J. Cao, K. Hwang, K. Li, and A. Y. Zomaya, "Optimal Multiserver Configuration for Profit Maximization in Cloud Computing," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol.24, No.6, pp.1087-1096, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2012.203
  18. S. M. Ross, Stochastic Processes, Wiley, 1996.
  19. J. Medhi, Stochastic Models in Queueing Theory, Academic Press, 2003.
  20. P. Naor, "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Vol.37, No.1, pp.15-24, 1969. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909200
  21. S. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  22. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stackelberg_competition