DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Grounded Theoretical Approach to the Co-offending Implementation Process of Robbery and Burglary Crime

강·절도범죄의 공범실행 과정에 대한 근거 이론적 접근

  • 김재경 (동국대학교 경찰행정학과) ;
  • 이선범 (동국대학교 경찰행정학과)
  • Received : 2019.02.13
  • Accepted : 2019.03.25
  • Published : 2019.04.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the co-offending implementation process of robbery and burglary crime. To this end, interview data for research projects conducted by the Korea Institute of Criminology in 2013(Advancing Knowledge About Co-Offending - Burglary and Robbery in Korea) were used as secondary data. Using secondary data, we attempted a grounded theory approach. Based on the procedure presented by Strauss&Corbin (1990), the open coding stage was derived from 51 concepts, 22 subcategories and 8 upper categories. According to an analysis tool called "coding paradigm," the causal condition is the cause of the robbery and burglary crime. Contextual conditions are the formation of co-offending relationship and the reason for selecting co-offending. The central phenomenon is the co-offending implementation of robbery and burglary crime. Interventing conditions are conflict between co-offenders and occurrence of arrest factor. The action/interaction strategy is arrested all co-offenders. The consequence consisted of ending the co-offending relationship. Finally, the selective coding stage selected 'the development of conflict between formation and end of co-offending relationship' as the core category, and newly established the co-offending relationship of robbery and burglary crime through the process of 'formation-implementation-conflict-arrest-end'.

Keywords

Robbery;Burglary;Co-offending;Grounded Theory;Crime

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_609_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 강·절도 범죄의 공범실행 과정 패러다임 모형

표 1. 연구 참여자의 일반적 사항

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_609_t0001.png 이미지

표 2. 개념의 범주화

CCTHCV_2019_v19n4_609_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. 강지현, "강.절도의 공범집단: 공범집단의 동질성과 범행지속성에 대한 탐색적 연구," 한국치안행정논집, 제11권, 제3호, pp.1-24, 2014.
  2. M. J. Hindelang, "The Social versus Solitary Nature of Delinquent Involvement," The British Journal of Criminology, Vol.11, No.2, pp.167-175, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046297
  3. M. Erickson, "The Group Context of Delinquent Behavior," Social Problems, Vol.19, No.1, pp.114-129, 1971. https://doi.org/10.2307/799944
  4. A. J. Reiss and D. P. Farrington, "Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males," Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol.82, No.2, pp.360-395, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143811
  5. K. P. Conway and J. A. McCord, "A Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Co-offending with Violent Accomplices and Violent Crime," Aggressive Behavior, Vol.28, No.2, pp.97-108, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90011
  6. M. A. Anderson and M. Felson, "Co-offending and the diversification of crime types," International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminolog, Vol.56, pp.811-829, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11407154
  7. S. B. van Mastrigt and D. P. Farrington, "Co-offending, age, gender and crime type: Implications for criminal justice policy," British Journal of Criminology, Vol.49, pp.552-573, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp021
  8. C. Carrington, "Group crime in canada," Canadian Review of Criminology, Vol.44, No.3, pp.277-315, 2002.
  9. 이민식, "마약류범죄의 공범구조 및 연결망 분석," 형사정책연구, 제18권, 제2호, pp.231-263, 2007.
  10. 박지선, 김지영, "How Robberies Differ based on the Number of Offenders Involved," 한국심리학회지:법, 제9권, 제1호, pp.21-40, 2018.
  11. A. J. Reiss, "Co-Offending and criminal careers. In Criminal Careers and Career Criminals," DC: National Academy Press, 1986.
  12. J. M. McGloin, C. J. Sullivan, A. R. Piquero, and S. Bacon, "nvestigation the stability of co-offending and co-offenders among a sample of youthful offenders," Criminology, Vol.46, No.1, pp.155-188, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00105.x
  13. 최정학, 최관호, 형법총론, 한국방송통신대학교 출판문화원, 2016.
  14. M. Warr, "Organization and instigation in delinquent groups," Criminology, Vol.34, No.1, pp.11-37, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01193.x
  15. F. Weerman, "Co-offending as social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending," British Journal of Criminology, Vol.43, No.2, pp.398-416, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.398
  16. 김영은, "사회적 교환이론에 근거한 조직지원인식이 보육교사의 조직몰입과 경력몰입에 미치는 영향," 한국보육학회지, 제11권, 제3호, pp.45-64, 2011.
  17. 마은경, 김명숙, "공공기관 내 구성원간의 지식 공유에 관한 연구: 사회교환이론 관점에서," Information systems review, 제7권, 제1호, pp.195-217, 2005.
  18. B. A. Koons-Witt and P. J. Schram, "Does Race Matter? Examining the Relationship Between Co-Offending and Victim Characteristics for Violent Incidents Involving Female Offenders," Feminist Criminology, Vol.1, No.2, pp.125-146, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105285971
  19. 김지영, 박지선, 이나림 "가해자-피해자 간 관계에 따른 강도범죄의 특성," 범죄수사학연구, 제2권, 제2호, pp.25-49, 2016.
  20. 박지선, 최낙범, "범죄 행동을 통한 대인 강도 범죄자의 유형별 분류에 관한 연구," 한국공안행정학회보, 제41권, pp.208-235, 2010.
  21. B. H. McCarthy, J. Hagan, and L. E. Cohen, "Uncertainty, cooperation, and crime: Understanding the decision to co-offend," Social Forces, Vol.77, pp.155-176, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.1.155
  22. 강지현, 김슬기, 공범있는 범죄의 구조와 특성에 관한 연구: 강.절도를 중심으로, 한국형사정책연구원 연구보고서, 2014.
  23. 이용민, 권오정, "근거이론에 기초한 베이비붐세대의 노후 주거 계획과정에 관한 연구," 한국노년학, 제35권, 제1호 pp.149-169, 2015.
  24. 문선아, 김봉근, 강진숙, "성폭력 범죄 보도 태도에 대한 근거 이론적 연구," 한국방송학보, 제29권, 제6호 pp.37-66, 2015
  25. J. Corbin and A. L. Strauss, "Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria," Qualitative Socialogy, Vol.13, No.1, pp.3-21, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
  26. 오경희, 근거이론을 바탕으로 한 산림치유현상 분석, 충북대학교, 박사학위논문, 2017.
  27. https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=3330841&cid=42266&categoryId=56815, 2018.10.03.
  28. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B3%B5%EB%B2%94, 2018.9.26.
  29. https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1063316&cid=40942&categoryId=31721, 2018.9.26.