Directions of Convergence Technology Education related to New Industry Field through Analysis of Industrial Needs

산업체 요구분석을 통한 신산업 융합기술교육의 방향

  • Jin, Sung-Hee (Division of Humanities and Liberal Arts, Hanbat National University)
  • 진성희 (한밭대학교 인문교양학부)
  • Received : 2019.05.24
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.08.28


Convergence education, which is operated by many engineering colleges, is mainly led by government-led projects. Convergence majors are established in consideration of the research field of the university professors rather than systematically analyzing the needs of the industry. The purpose of this study is to present the directions of convergence technology education related to new industry fields by analyzing industry needs. Participants were 299 industrial workers in various fields. Instrument consisted of three parts: necessity for convergence education, demand for convergence new technology education from industry perspective, and opinions about undergraduate convergence education. As a result, it was found that the level of awareness of industry needs for fusion technology education was high, and it was confirmed that there is a high demand for IoT convergence, bio-health, advanced new material, and renewable energy fields among convergence technology fields. In addition, the results of the industry demand for convergence new technology education were presented. The suggestions for expectations, problems, and improvements in undergraduate education were presented and implications for convergence technology education were discussed based on the results of the study.


Convergence technology education;Analysis industry needs;Convergence majors;New industry field;The $4^{th}$ industrial revolution


  1. B. Son, J. Kim & D. Chio. (2017). Major Science and Technology Innovation Policy Tasks for the 4th Industrial Revolution. Issue Paper 2017-04. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning.
  2. G. Kim. (2003). Actual operation of interdisciplinary major. Higher Education, 124, 54-59.
  3. KISTEP. (2015). IMD 2014 World Competitiveness Yearbook Analysis: Focus on Science and Technology Infrastructure. Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning 2015-003.
  4. G. Kim, H. Lee, J. Kim & H. Geon (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution of Major Countries and Korea's Growth Strategies: Focused on USA, Germany and Japan. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Research report.
  5. Research Center for Engineering Education Innovation. (2015). Research on Demand for New Convergence Technology Education from Industry Perspective I: Focused on Nano, Bio, Robot, and Design Fields. RICEE-2015-01.
  6. R. Yun, I. Kim, & B. Choi. (2011). A Study on Convergence Education: A case of Hanbat National University. Engineering Education Research, 14(3), 55-60.
  7. S. Jin & S. Shin. (2013). Case Study and Needs Analysis on Convergence Education in Engineering Colleges. Engineering Education Research, 16(6), 29-37.
  8. K. Schwab. (2015). World Economic Forum. The global competitiveness report, 2016, 2015-2016.
  9. Research Center for Engineering Education Innovation. (2016). Research on Demand for New Convergence Technology Education from Industry Perspective II: Focused on electronic, software and automotive fields. RICEE-2016-01.
  10. Research Center for Engineering Education Innovation. (2017). A case study on convergence curriculum at home and abroad: focusing on shipbuilding, aviation, civil engineering, and energy engineering. RICEE-2017-02.
  11. S. Kim, Y. Chung, A. Woo & H. Lee. (2012). Development of a Theoretical Model for STEAM Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 388-403.
  12. Intellectual Property Human Resource Division. (2012). A Study on Establishment of Practical Intellectual Property Personnel and Implementation Plan of Intellectual Property Education Program. Research report.
  13. Y. Shin & S. Han. (2011). A Study of the Elementary School Teachers' Perception in STEAM Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) Education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
  14. S. M. Drake & R. C. Burns. (2004). Integrated curriculum. Alexandria. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  15. OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world; First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
  16. R. Root-Bernstein & M. Root-Bernstein. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  17. R. Routman. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.