Identification of Latent Profiles in Perception of Work Environment among Workers in Residential Facilities for People with Disabilities

장애인거주시설 종사자의 직무환경인식 잠재프로파일에 따른 직무만족도 차이

  • Lee, Hyun Jung (Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Honam University)
  • 이현정 (호남대학교 언어치료학과)
  • Received : 2019.05.27
  • Accepted : 2019.08.20
  • Published : 2019.08.28


This study used latent profile analysis to identify heterogeneous subgroups with respect to the perception of work environment among workers in residential facilities for people with disabilities. The final model yielded five latent profiles of the perception of work environment: 'low workload group' who scored low in time pressure and job responsibility, 'discrimination perception group' who scored low in supervisor support and high in sex and academic/regional discriminations, 'positive perception group' who scored high in work autonomy and peer and supervisor supports, 'high workload group' who scored high in workload, time pressure, and job responsibility, and 'average group' who scored average in most areas. In the case of job satisfaction, positive perception group was the highest, followed by average group, low and high workload groups, and discrimination perception group.


Workers in Disabled Residential Facilities;Perception of Work Environment;Latent Profile Analysis;Job Satisfaction


Supported by : Honam University


  1. K. H. Byon et al. (2014). A Study on the Protection of Human Rights and Improvement of Service Quality. Seoul : National Human Rights Commission of Korea.
  2. H. M. Yoon. (1993). Multilateral understanding and countermeasures. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 118-141.
  3. F. Herzberg. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 86-97.
  4. L. W. Porter & E. E. Lawler. (1965). Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior. Psychological Bulletin 64(1), 23-51. DOI : 10.1037/h0022166
  5. P. L. Stamps, E. B. Piedmont, D. B. Slavitt & A. M. Haase. (1978). Measurement of work satisfaction among health professionals. Medical Care, 16(4), 337-352.
  6. E. A. Locke. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto : Consulting Psychologists Press.
  7. R. N. Osborn, J. R. Schermerhorn Jr. & J. G. Hunt. (1972). Managing Organizational Behavior. New York : John Willey and Sons Inc.
  8. L. E. Saunders. (1981). Exploration of the usefulness of 'Important' work related needs as a tool for studies in job satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, USA.
  9. J. R. Schermerhorn, J. G. Hunt & R. N. Osborn. (2000). Organizational Behavior. New York : John Willey and Sons, Inc.
  10. J. Strolin-Goltzman. (2008). Should I stay or should I go? A comparison study of intention to leave among public welfare systems with high and low turnover rates. Child Welfare, 87(4), 125-143.
  11. Y. T. Kim, H.-W. Kim & Y.-B. Yeom. (2009). A study on the critical variable of job satisfaction of care giver between long term and home base care service center. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 46, 53-75. DOI : 10.21194/kjgsw..46.200912.53
  12. H. Kim. (2011). Factors influencing on the job satisfaction for care workers: Case study of Jeollanamdo. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 42(4), 35-59. DOI : 10.16999/kasws.2011.42.4.35
  13. Y.-M. Jang, G.-Y. Kang & J.-W. Baik. (2010). A study effect of care worker's job satisfaction in Korea and Japan. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 50, 173-196. DOI : 10.21194/kjgsw..50.201012.173
  14. G. S. Kong. (2010). The study on job environment and job satisfaction affecting turnover intention of front-line welfare workers in community child centers. Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 15(4), 23-48.
  15. K. S. Sim. (2003). A study on job satisfaction of social workers in mental health. Journal of Korean Social Welfare Administration, 5(3), 169-195.
  16. C. L. Hulin. (1991). Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto : Consulting Psychologists Press.
  17. K. L. Nylund, T. Asparouhov & B. O. Muthen. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569. DOI : 10.1080/10705510701575396
  18. K. Jedidi, V. Ramaswamy & W. S. DeSarbo. (1993). A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable. Psychometrika, 58(3), 375-394.
  19. D. Nagin. (2005). Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.