DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of energy and nutrient utilization in the aged laying hens with different eggshell strengths or different intensities of brown eggshell color

  • Kim, Jong Hyuk (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Han, Gi Ppeum (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kang, Hwan Ku (Poultry Research Institute, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kil, Dong Yong (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2019.04.12
  • Accepted : 2019.07.12
  • Published : 2019.09.01

Abstract

The current experiment was conducted to compare nutrient utilization in the aged laying hens with different eggshell strengths or different intensities of brown eggshell color. Two metabolic trials with 96-week-old Hy-Line Brown laying hens were conducted. Twelve hens with a strong eggshell strength (SES) and 12 hens with a weak eggshell strength (WES) were selected and used in the first experiment, whereas 12 hens with dark brown eggshells (DBE) and 12 hens with light brown eggshells (LBE) were selected and used in the second experiment. All hens were fed a common commercial layer diet. Diets included chromic oxide as an indigestible marker to determine the apparent total tract retention (ATTR) of the gross energy (GE), dry matter, acid-hydrolyzed ether extract, nitrogen, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, ash, and minerals. The results indicate that the ATTR of Ca in the aged laying hens with SES (59.7%) was greater (p < 0.05) than in the aged laying hens with WES (48.6%). However, the ATTR of the GE and other nutrients was not different between the hens with SES or WES. There were no differences in the ATTR of GE and nutrients between the hens with DBE or LBE. In conclusion, aged laying hens with SES have a greater ability to utilize dietary Ca than those with WES, indicating that the extent of dietary Ca utilization determines the eggshell strength of aged laying hens. However, nutrient utilization in diets may have little impact on eggshell brown coloration in aged laying hens.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Rural Development Administration

References

  1. An SH, Kim DW, An BK. 2016. Effects of dietary calcium levels on productive performance, eggshell quality and overall calcium status in aged laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 29:1477-1482. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0655
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2007. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. AOAC Int., Gaithersburg, USA.
  3. Choi HK, Park GH, Kim JH, Ji SY, Kil DY. 2019. Determination of calcium and phosphorus utilization in various hatchery by-products for broiler chickens. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:361-368.
  4. Chousalkar KK, Roberts JR. 2009. Effects of Australian strains of infectious bronchitis virus on internal and external quality of hen eggs. Animal Production Science 49:162-169. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08167
  5. Edwards HM Jr, Gillis MB. 1959. A chromic oxide balance method for determining phosphate availability. Poultry Science 38:569-574. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0380569
  6. Gutierrez del Alamo A, Verstegen MWA, Den Hartog LA, Perez de Ayala P, Villamide MJ. 2008. Effect of wheat cultivar and enzyme addition to broiler chicken diets on nutrient digestibility, performance, and apparent metabolizable energy content. Poultry Science 87:759-767.
  7. Hill FW, Anderson DL. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. The Journal of Nutrition 64:587-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/64.4.587
  8. Hy-Line International. 2018. Hy-Line brown commercial layers. Management Guide. p. 28. Accessed in https://www.hyline.com/UserDocs/Pages/BRN_COM_ENG.pdf on 5 March 2019.
  9. Kim CH, Paik IK, Kil DY. 2013. Effects of increasing supplementation of magnesium in diets on productive performance and eggshell quality of aged laying hens. Biological Trace Element Research 151:38-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9537-z
  10. Leeson S, Summers JD. 2008. Commercial poultry nutrition. 3rd ed. Nottingham University Press, Guelph, Canada.
  11. Lim HS, Namkung H, Paik IK. 2003. Effects of phytase supplementation on the performance, egg quality, and phosphorous excretion of laying hens fed different levels of dietary calcium and nonphytate phosphorous. Poultry Science 82:92-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.1.92
  12. Lim HS, Paik IK. 2003. Effects of supplementary mineral methionine chelates (Zn, Cu, Mn) on the performance and eggshell quality of laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 16:1804-1808. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1804
  13. Mabe I, Rapp C, Bain MM, Nys Y. 2003. Supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet with manganese, copper, and zinc from organic or inorganic sources improves eggshell quality in aged laying hens. Poultry Science 82:1903-1913. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1903
  14. Odabasi AZ, Miles RD, Balaban MO, Portier KM. 2007. Changes in brown eggshell color as the hen ages. Poultry Science 86:356-363.
  15. Odabasi AZ, Miles RD, Balaban MO, Portier KM, Sampath V. 2006. Vitamin C overcomes the detrimental effect of vanadium on brown eggshell pigmentation. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15:425-432. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/15.3.425
  16. Oh HJ, Cho JH, Lee Y, Yu SB, Lee JJ, Cho SK. 2018. Effect of natural mineral complex on egg quality, egg production and hatchability in laying hens during the summer season. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:229-237. [in Korean]
  17. Roberts JR. 2004. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. Journal of Poultry Science 41:161-177. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.41.161
  18. Safaa HM, Serrano MP, Valencia DG, Frikha M, Jimenez-Moreno E, Mateos GG. 2008. Productive performance and egg quality of brown egg-laying hens in the late phase of production as influenced by level and source of calcium in the diet. Poultry Science 87:2043-2051. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00110
  19. Samiullah S, Roberts J, Chousalkar K. 2016. Oviposition time, flock age, and egg position in clutch in relation to brown eggshell color in laying hens. Poultry Science 95:2052-2057. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew197
  20. Samiullah S, Roberts JR, Chousalkar K. 2015. Eggshell color in brown-egg laying hens - a review. Poultry Science 94:2566-2575. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev202
  21. Seo S, Jeon S, Ha JK. 2018. Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 31:1381-1386. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0468
  22. Seo YM, Shin KS, Rhee AR, Chi YS, Han J, Paik IK. 2010. Effects of dietary Fe-soy proteinate and MgO on egg production and quality of eggshell in laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23:1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.10076
  23. Sirri F, Zampiga M, Berardinelli A, Meluzzi A. 2018. Variability and interaction of some egg physical and eggshell quality attributes during the entire laying hen cycle. Poultry Science 97:1818-1823.
  24. Solomon SE. 1987. Eggshell pigmentation. In Egg quality: Current problems and recent advances edited by Wells RG, Belyavin CG. pp. 147-157. Butterworths, London, UK.
  25. Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., NY, USA.
  26. Stefanello C, Santos TC, Murakami AE, Martins EN, Carneiro TC. 2013. Productive performance, eggshell quality, and eggshell ultrastructure of laying hens fed diets supplemented with organic trace minerals. Poultry Science 93:104-113.
  27. Wang JP, Lee JH, Jang HD, Yan L, Cho JH, Kim IH. 2011. Effects of ${\delta}$-aminolevulinic acid and vitamin C supplementation on iron status, production performance, blood characteristics and egg quality of laying hens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 95:417-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01067.x