DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Korean Version of Acute Concussion Evaluation using Cross-cultural Translation Methodology: Pilot Study

Acute Concussion Evaluation의 한국어 번역 및 문화적 개작: 예비 연구

  • Received : 2019.09.11
  • Accepted : 2019.10.06
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to provide Korean version of mild traumatic brain injury assessment tool. Methods The original version of acute concussion evaluation (ACE) was translated into Korean, and it was then back-translated into English without any prior knowledge of ACE. Finally, the pre-final version of Korean version of acute concussion evaluation (K-ACE) was derived. 49 Korean patients who had been diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury participated in the study and completed K-ACE. Overall, 44 data were used to analyze findings. Validity of the study was assessed based on Concurrent validity. Reliability was also evaluated using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ value for each item presented a proper level of internal consistency with results of 0.711 to 0.893 in two evaluations, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the retest reliability was marked as 0.892 (95% CI 0.840~0.933). Concurrent validity demonstrated positive correlations between K-ACE and Korean version of postconcussional syndrome questionnaire. Conclusions The K-ACE is concluded as a valid and reliable tool for measuring mild traumatic brain injury and post-concussion symptoms. Upon completion of the follow-up study, the K-ACE will be well-utilized by both clinicians and researchers.

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 청연중앙연구소

References

  1. Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S, Barth J, Getchius TS, Gioia GA, Gronseth GS, Guskiewicz K, Mandel S, Manley G, McKeag DB, Thurman DJ, Zafonte R. Summary of evidence-based guideline update: evaluation and management of concussion in sports: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;80(24):2250-7. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828d57dd
  2. Voss JD, Connolly J, Schwab KA, Scher AI. Update on the epidemiology of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015;19(7):32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-015-0506-z
  3. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Bailes J, Broglio S, Cantu RC, Cassidy D, Echemendia RJ, Castellani RJ, Davis GA, Ellenbogen R, Emery C, Engebretsen L, Feddermann-Demont N, Giza CC, Guskiewicz KM, Herring S, Iverson GL, Johnston KM, Kissick J, Kutcher J, Leddy JJ, Maddocks D, Makdissi M, Manley GT, McCrea M, Meehan WP, Nagahiro S, Patricios J, Putukian M, Schneider KJ, Sills A, Tator CH, Turner M, Vos PE. Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5(th) international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(11):838-47.
  4. Walker WC, Cifu DX, Hudak AM, Goldberg G, Kunz RD, Sima AP. Structured interview for mild traumatic brain injury after military blast: inter-rater agreement and development of diagnostic algorithm. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(7):464-73. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3433
  5. Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury. Case management of concussion/Mild TBI 2013. [Internet] 2013 [cited 2019 Sep 9]. Available from: URL: http://dvbic.dcoe.mil/sites/default/files/TBI_CM-SOP-2013revisions-V0-6_6-5-2013.pdf.
  6. Gioia GA, Collins M, Isquith PK. Improving identification and diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury with evidence: psychometric support for the acute concussion evaluation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(4):230-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HTR.0000327255.38881.ca
  7. Zuckerbraun NS, Atabaki S, Collins MW, Thomas D, Gioia GA. Use of modified acute concussion evaluation tools in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):635-42. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2600
  8. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  9. Yoon MR, Ko YH, Han CS, Joe SH, Jeon SW, Han CW. Development of the Korean version of Postconcussional Syndrome Questionnaire. Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine. 2015;23(1):26-35.
  10. Mollayeva T, Cassidy JD, Shapiro CM, Mollayeva S, Colantonio A. Concussion/mild traumatic brain injury-related chronic pain in males and females: A diagnostic modelling study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(7):e5917. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005917
  11. Foundation for industry cooperation. University of Ulsan. Valuation of Korean Health-related Quality of Life Instrument with 8 Items (HINT-8). 2017:1-128.
  12. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Traumatic brain injury. [Internet] 2014 [cited 2019 Sep 11]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/.
  13. King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995;242(9):587-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868811
  14. Axelrod BN, Fox DD, Lees-Haley PR, Earnest K, Dolezal-Wood S. Application of the Postconcussive Syndrome Questionnaire with medical and psychiatric outpatients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1998;13(6):543-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/13.6.543
  15. Lovell MR, Collins MW. Neuropsychological assessment of the college football player. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):9-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199804000-00004
  16. Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, Podell K, Johnston KM, Pardini D, Pardini J, Norwig J, Maroon JC. Measurement of symptoms following sports-related concussion: reliability and normative data for the post-concussion scale. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(3):166-74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1303_4
  17. Sady MD, Vaughan CG, Gioia GA. Psychometric characteristics of the postconcussion symptom inventory in children and adolescents. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29(4):348-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu014
  18. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012