• 제목/요약/키워드: 창업교과과정

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.168 seconds

A Study for Curriculum Design of Entrepreneurship Education in University (창업교육의 대학교과과정 설계 방향에 관한 연구)

  • Mok, Young-Du;Choi, Myeong-Gil;Chun, Min-Jun
    • Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
    • /
    • 2009.05a
    • /
    • pp.178-181
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구의 목적은 창업교육을 하나의 사회 시스템으로 인식하고 고등학교 창업교육부터 대학 및 대학원의 창업교육, 예비 창업자들에 대한 일반 창업교육까지를 연계한 체계적인 창업교육의 설계방향을 제시하는 것이다. 특히도 창업의 저변확대를 위해 가장 핵심적 영역인 대학 학부의 창업교과과정의 바람직한 설계방향을 제시하고자 한다. 이에 창업교육에 대한 학자들의 관점, 국내대학 창업교육의 현황, 국내외 대학원의 창업교육 현황 등의 검토내용을 기반으로 대학 학부의 창업교과과정을 공통기초과정과 전공선택과정으로 나누어 설계하는 방안을 제시했다. 아울러 전공선택과정은 전공영역(major area)과 집중영역(concentration area)으로 나누어 설계할 것을 제언한다.

  • PDF

대학 창업교육과정 만족도가 기업가적 기민성, 기회인식, 창업의지에 미치는 영향 : 교육과정특성의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • Han, Won-Hui;HwangBo, Yun
    • 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2020.06a
    • /
    • pp.75-84
    • /
    • 2020
  • 2010년 이후 정부는 일자리문제 등을 해결하기 위해 창업활성화를 국정과제로 내세우고 있다. 새로운 기회와 가치창출을 통한 창업활성화를 위해 창업의지는 필수적인 요소지만 창업의지를 높이기 위한 방법론 적에 대하여는 많은 연구들의 견해가 엇갈리고 있다. 본 연구는 창업활성화의 첫걸음으로 창업의지를 꼽았으며 창업의지를 가지기위한 선행조건으로 기업가적 기민성·기회인식 역량을 갖추어야 하며 이러한 역량을 강화하기 위해 현재 중점 추진되고 있는 정부주도의 대학 창업교육과정의 역할에 대해 살펴보고자 한다. 또한, 창업교육과정별(교과과정 VS 비교과과정) 비교를 통해 향후 나아가야 할 창업교육의 방향을 제시하고자 한다. 연구목적 달성을 위해 문헌연구와 이를 토대로 한 실증연구 결과는 대학 창업교육과정이 창업에 필수적인 창업의지를 키우기 위한 기업가적 기민성과 기회인식 역량을 증대 및 영향을 끼치는 것을 시사하며 교육 만족도에 따라 그 효과는 변화된다는 것을 보여 준다. 또한, 창업교과과정(학점) 보단 창업비교과과정이(비학점) 창업의지에 더욱 영향을 끼치는 것을 나타내는 결과를 보여주었다. 이러한 연구결과는 대학창업교육과정이 기업가적 기민성과 기회인식의 역량을 증대 시킬 수 있는 창업교육으로 커리큘럼을 수립해야 할 것이며 이론과정 보단 실습 위주의 교육으로 나아가야 한다는 방향성을 보여준다.

  • PDF

A Study on the Convergence Entrepreneurship Curriculum Development (융·복합 창업교육 교과과정 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Heung-Su
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.79-88
    • /
    • 2015
  • Creative economy has been characterized by ideas popularized commercialization. The commercialization of the idea is to develop a creative economy virtuous circle tool, entrepreneurship and start-ups for this serves as a key driver of the creative economy. Convergence, complex thinking and creative planning ability is always a lot from the 20s came a young man. So young age of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship education, and is easily capable of founding a new culture is created by the right products and services they lead the more outstanding talent in the way of entrepreneurship creates even young and energetic national economy. Such a wide range of system implementation and curriculum development to complete the creative economy with ecology is also a very critical situation. The development of a systematic entrepreneurship curriculum that promote creative thinking and planning ability for creative convergence of economic times is a top priority. The present study considered that the early stages of convergence entrepreneurship program presents a convergence process of entrepreneurship education through a process-oriented research based on statistics.

A Study on Curriculum Design of Entrepreneurship Education in Undergraduate School (창업교육의 대학교과과정 설계방향에 관한 연구)

  • Mok, Young-Du;Choi, Myeong-Gil
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.320-334
    • /
    • 2010
  • Due to the global economic crisis and jobless growth, the problem of employment is becoming an important social issue. Fostering potential entrepreneurs with systematic education can be an alternative for resolving the jobless growth problem. Therefore, this study presents entrepreneurship subjects which are needed for designing a curriculum of the systematic entrepreneurship education. This study develops a questionnaire based on prior researches, and executes the survey of two focused groups comprised with a group of researchers lecturing subjects related with entrepreneurship and a group of executing an entrepreneurship consulting. The result of the study can be applied to design and run the curriculum in the universities, which consider introducing stage of entrepreneurship education. This study help a entrepreneurship department to bear the curriculum, and a direction of specialization.

A Study on the Entrepreneurship Curriculum Development Model to Systemize Entrepreneurship Education in Entrepreneurial Graduate School (AHP를 활용한 창업대학원 교과목 선호도 평가요인별 중요도에 관한 연구: 창업대학원 재학생을 대상으로)

  • Lee, Il han;Kim, Hyun sook
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
    • /
    • v.11 no.6
    • /
    • pp.131-142
    • /
    • 2016
  • Since global circumstances have become competitive, entrepreneurship has been regarded as the most important factors in economic revitalization not only in korea but also internationally. According to these changes, public entrepreneurship education has been started from the year of 2004 establishing Entrepreneurial Graduate School as a part of governmental plan. Although entrepreneurship education history is not long enough in korea, but the need for entrepreneurship education in social is now going ahead of the public education systems such as universities and graduate schools. Therefore, this study is conducted for the purpose of drawing the subject frame for systematized integration curriculum of entrepreneurship education through evaluating the importance of the subjects by Analytic Hierarchy Process analysis after being composed of 6 modularity in the Entrepreneurship subjects. This was structured based on studying the current status for entrepreneurship education in domestic universities and graduate schools. The research findings under the condition of Judgement consistency ratio 0.1 are as follows. The most important factors are in order as following; "Entrepreneurial Issues for Fund"(.242), "Entrepreneurship Plan"(.195), "Entrepreneurship & Entrepreneurship mindset"(.161), "Entrepreneurial Issues for Growth & Development"(.160), "Management Skill & Strategy"(.150), and "Special Entrepreneurship"(.093). Then, these findings also represent subfactors as well. The results of this study provide the practical guidelines where the curriculums needed for the entrepreneurship education at graduate schools by suggesting consistency for the systematic and comprehensive curriculum design. It was reflected the survey result from the graduate students taking the entrepreneurship subjects. Therefore, it will contribute the foundation of the present curriculum of Entrepreneurial Graduate School.

  • PDF

Comparative Analysis of Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurship Programs in American Universities: Focusing on Major Entrepreneurship Centers in 7 Universities in the United States (미국 대학의 창업교육 및 창업프로그램 비교분석: 미국 7개 대학 주요 기업가정신센터를 중심으로)

  • Lee, Sung Ho;Nam, Jung Min
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
    • /
    • v.15 no.6
    • /
    • pp.67-79
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study analyzed the start-up education curriculum and start-up education programs of seven universities in the U.S. to find out what courses are provided, what various programs exist, and what the characteristics of start-up education in each university are. California State University, San Bernardino / University of California, Irvine / Drexel University / Oklahoma State University / Florida State University / San Diego State University / University of Southern California where entrepreneurship education based on the Entrepreneurship Degree Course is being established based on the Entrepreneurship Center of seven universities in the United States, which is not well introduced in Korea. This study examined how the start-up education courses and start-up support systems at seven universities in the U.S. are progressing at the undergraduate, MBA, master's and doctoral levels, and comparative levels. Through the case studies of the universities presented, the primary analysis was carried out to explore the various characteristics of American university start-up education. The implications of start-up education at American universities in this study are as follows. First, in order for universities to take the initiative in providing start-up education, they should be organized to suit the course of start-up education suitable for the characteristics of universities and introduce support programs. Second, it is necessary to establish an independent center within domestic universities to be operated autonomously. Third, the start-up education of universities should include building university-industry partnerships, operating entrepreneurship degree courses and collaboration between departments of universities. Fourth, the independent center should lead the active participation of alumni and local start-ups and start-up-related programs should be operated based on this. Fifth, Differentiated programs for each university's characteristics should be introduced and applied to universities. Although case studies have limitations that cannot be generalized, they can provide a useful framework. Therefore, it is necessary to design a systematic start-up education that reflects the correct design direction and characteristics of each university.