Primary Tissue Filure of Bioprosthetic Valves

생물학적 보철판막의 조직실패

  • Published : 1993.09.01

Abstract

Boprosthetic cardiac valves fail from biological and metabolic as well as mechanical reasons, and the limited durability is the main factor of marked withdrawal in their clinical use. Starting the use of bioprosthetic valves in 1976, up to the end of 1992, the consecutive 178 patients have undergone re-replacement of glutaraldehyde-treated xenograft valves for primary tissue failure [PTF]among the patients who had initial valve replacement at Seoul national University Hospital. The explanted valves were 69 porcine aortic [51 Hancock, 12 Angell-Shiley and 6 Carentier-Edwards] and 141 bovine pericardial [129 standard-profile and 12 low-profile ionescu-Shiley] valwes, with an overall incidence of PTF of 15.2%. The operative mortality rate of re-replacement was 5.1%. Calcific degeneration and tissue damage in relation to calcification were the most frequent modes of PTF on gross examinatin of the explanted valves resulting hemodynamically in valvular regurgitation. The number of Hancocg porcine and the standard-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves in valves in mitral position failed more often from tissue damage [tears, holes, and loss or destruction of cuspal tissue] than calcification [68.3% vs. 39.0%, p<0.01] with resultant regurgitation in 61%, the Ionescu-Shiley valves in the same position in 53%. The tendency of more calcification than tissue damage[71.3% vs. 33.3%, p<0.001]with stenosis in 53%. The tendency of more calcification and immobility of cusps in the latter group was partly explainable by the inclusion of patients of pediatric age. Observation made in this study suggest : many of bioprosthetic valves would fail from calcification and tissue damage : some fail prematurely because of mechanical stress probably owing to the valve design in construction ; andeven those valves escaped early damage would be subject to calcify in the prolonged follow-up period. In conclusion, at the present time, the clinical use of bioprostheticxenograft valves seems to be quite limited until further improvement in biocompatibility and refinement in valve design in manufacture are achieved.

Keywords

References

  1. 大胸外誌 v.25 異種組織瓣膜의 耐久性 金鍾煥
  2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.73 Long-term experience with poricne aortic valve xenografts Carpentier,A.;Stinson,E.B.;Griepp,R.B.;Oyer,P.E.;Shumway,N.E.
  3. Ann Thorac Surg v.44 Intrinsic failure on Hancock mitral bioprostheses: 10-to 15-year experienc Foster,A.H.;Greenberg,G.J.;Underhill,D.J.;McIntosh,C.L.;Clark,R.E.
  4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.78 Long-term evaluation of the porcine xenograft bioprosthesis Oyer,P.E.;Stinson,E.B.;Reitz,B.A.;Miller,D.C.;Rossiter,S.J.;Shumway,N.E.
  5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.78 Late failure of porcine xenogrefts in children Geha,A.S.;Laks,H.;Stansel,H.C.Jr.(et al.)
  6. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.73 Long-term experience with porcine aortic valve xenografts Stinson,E.B.;Griepp,R.B.;Oyer,P.E.;Shumway,N.E.
  7. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.89 The procine bioprosthetic valve:twelve years later Magilligan,D.J.Jr.;Lewis,J.W.Jr.;Tilley,B.;Peterson,E.
  8. Ann Thorac Surg v.46 Carpentier Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: Primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups Jamieson,W.R.E.;Rosado,L.J.;Munro,A.I.(et al.)
  9. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.93 Biologcal versus mechanical valves: analysis of 1.116 valves inserted in 1, 012 adult patients with a 4, 818 patient-year and a 5, 327 valve-year follow-up Hammond,G.L.;Geha\h,A.S.;Kopf,G.S.;Hashim,S.W.
  10. Ann Thorac Surg v.42 Comparison of long-term results of Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock bioprosthetic valves BollooBi,H.;Kaiser,G.A.;Mallon,S.M.;Palatianos,G.M.
  11. Ann Thorac Surg v.46 Performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following alrtic valve replacement : considerations based on a 15-year experience Milano,A.D.;Bortolotti,U.;Mazzucco,A.(et al.)
  12. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.93 Patterns of failure in Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericarbial bioprosthetic valves Walley,V.M.;Keon,W.J.
  13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.95 Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons? Gabbay,S.;Kadam,P.;Factor,S.;Cheum,T.H.
  14. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.94 Primary tissue failure in pericardial heart valves Wheatley,D.J.;Fisher,J.;Reece,I.J.;Spyt,T.;Breeze,P.
  15. Ann Thorac Surg v.54 Ionescu-Shiley valve failure I:experience with 125 standard-profile explants Walley,V.M.;Keon,C.A.;Khalili,M.;Moher,D.;Campagna,M.;Keon,W.J.
  16. Ann Thorac Surg v.54 Ionescu-Shiley valve failure II:experience with 25 low-profile explants Walley,V.M.;Keon,C.A.;Khalili,M.;Moher,D.;Campagna,M.;Keon,W.J.
  17. Surgery for Heart Valve Disease Ionescu-Shiley legacy Frater,R.W.M.;Ravichandran,P.S.;Kay,P.H.;Kollar,A.;Murday,A.J.;Bodnar,E.
  18. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.104 New aspects of the degeneration of bioprostetic heart valves after long-term implantation Grabenwoger,M.;Grimm,M.;Eybl,E.(et al.)
  19. Surgery for Heart valve Disease Stress-related failure modes of bovine pericarbial heart valves Christie,G.W.;Stephenson,R.A.;Bodnar,E.
  20. Ann Thorac Surg v.53 The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve:intermediate results Frater,R.W.M.;Salomon,N.W.;Rainer,W.G.;Cosgrove,D.M.III;Wickham,E.