Prediction Model of Weed Population in Paddy Fields - I. Practical Approach to Development of Prediction Model

논 잡초발생(雜草發生) 예측(豫測)모델 개발(開發) 연구(硏究) - I. 예측(豫測)모델 개발(開發) 접근방법(接近方法)

  • Lee, H.K. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lee, I.Y. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Ryu, G.H. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lee, J.O. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Park, Y.S. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, RDA)
  • Received : 1993.06.20
  • Published : 1993.06.30

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in 1992 to find out the approach to the development of prediction model of weed population in paddy fields. The weed seeds of 88% over were separated from the soil by using $K_2CO_3$ 50% solution with specific gravity 1.34. The weed seeds which were floated on the solution due to the difference of specific gravity between soil particles and the seeds were effectively withdrawn by using a vaccum pump attached with an aspirator. The seeds withdrawn together with solution were taken by filtering with a nylon net of $0.31{\times}0.16mm$ mesh. The pressing method was more efficient and practical for the viability test of weed seeds separated from the soil compared with the germination test and the TTC test. For the prediction of weed population by the number of weed seedlings emerged at the sampled soil, the sampling method of 0-10cm deep at 5-6 sites per field was applicable. At the prediction method by the number of seedlings emerged, the smaller the seed sizes, the lower the prediction coefficients of weed species. It was considered that the prediction method by the number of seedlings emerged was more practical than the prediction method by the number of seeds separated from sampled soil, in relation to similarities to weed population, time and expenses required for examining, technical difficulties and applicability of weed species.

논잡초발생(雜草發生) 예측(豫測)모델 개발(開發)에 가장 실용적(實用的)인 접근방법(接近方法)을 구명(究明)하기 위하여 1992년(年) 분리종자(分離種子)에 의한 예측법(豫測法)과 출현잡초(出現雜草)에 의한 예측법(豫測法)을 비교(比較)하여 다음과 같은 결과(結果)를 얻었다. 1 탄산가리($K_2CO_3$) 50% 용액(溶液)(비중(比重)1.34)으로 토양(土壞)에 들어 있는 종자(種子)의 88% 이상(以上)이 분리(分離) 회수(回收)되었다. 2. 비중(比重) 차이(差異)에 의해서 토양(土壞)으로부터 분리(分離)된 잡초종자(雜草種子)는 흡출기(吸出器)를 부착(附着)한 진공(眞空)펌프기와 강목(綱目) $0.31{\times}0.16mm$의 나이론망사(網紗)를 이용(利用)하여 효율적(效率的)으로 회수(回收)되었다. 3. 토양(土壞)으로부터 분리(分離)된 잡초종자(雜草種子)의 생존(生存) 여부(與否)를 검정(檢定)하는 방법(方法) 중(中)에서 종자(種子) 압착법(壓搾法)이 종자(種子) 발아법(發芽法)이나 TTC 검정법(檢定法)에 비(比)하여 더 효율적(效率的)이고 실용적(實用的)인 방법(方法)이었다. 4. 본답(本畓) 잡초군락(雜草群落)을 샘플토양(土壞)에 출현(出現)하는 잡초(雜草)에 의해서 예측(豫測)하고자 할 때에는 포장당(圃場當) 5-6개(個) 지점(地點)에서 직경(直徑) 13cm 코아로 0-10cm 깊이의 토양(土壞)을 샘플링하는 것이 가장 적합(適合)한 방법(方法)이었다. 5. 샘플토양(土壞)에 출현(出現)하는 잡초(雜草)에 의한 예측법(豫測法)에서 소형종자(小形重子)를 생산(生産)하는 초종(草種)일수록 본답(本畓) 잡초발생(雜草發生) 예측계수(豫測係數)가 낮았다. 6. 본답(本畓) 잡초군락(雜草群落)과의 유이성(類似性), 조사(調査) 소요시간(所要時間), 조사(調査) 소요경비(所要經費), 조사기술(調査技術)의 난이도(難易度), 적용잡초(適用雜草) 등(等)으로 보아 출형잡초(出現雜草)에 의한 예측법(豫測法)이 분리종자(分離種子)에 의한 예측법(豫測法)에 비(比)하여 보다 합리적(合理的)인 방법(方法)으로 판단(判斷)되었다.

Keywords