Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of surface conditioning with $10\%$ polyacrylic acid, etching with $38\%$ phosphoric acid, and polishing with a slurry of pumice on shear bond strengths of light-cured glass ionomer cement, chemically cured glass ionomer cement, and a composite resin to enamel, and to observe the failure patterns of bracket bondings. Shear bond strengths of glass ionomer cements were compared with that of a composite resin. Metal brackets were bonded on the extracted human bicuspids after enamel surface treatments, and samples were immersed in the $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water bath, and shear bond strengths of glass ionomer cements and a composite resin were measured on the Instron machine after 24hrs passed, and the deboned samples were measured in respect of adhesive remnant index. Scanning electron micrographs were taken of enamel surfaces after various treatments. The data were evaluated and tested by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test, and those results were as follows. 1. Shear bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement showed statistically higher than that of chemically cured glass ionomer cement. 2. Shear bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements to enamel treated with $10\%$ polyacrylic acid and $38\%$ phosphoric acid showed statistically higher than those with a slurry of pumice. 3. According to scanning electron micrographs, enamel surface conditioned with $10\%$ polyacrylic acid is slightly etched and cleaned, that etched with $38\%$ phosphoric acid is severely etched, and that polished with a slurry of pumice is irregulary scretched and not completely cleaned. 4. After debonding, light-cured glass ionomer cement to enamel treated with $10\%$ polyacrylic acid showed less residual materials on the enamel solace than composite resin to enamel etched with $38\%$ phosphoric acid. 5. There was no significant difference in the shear bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement to enamel treated with $10\%$ polyacrylic acid and that of composite resin to enamel etched with $38\%$ Phosphoric acid.
이 연구는 법랑질의 표면처리가 광중합형 및 화학중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 브라켓 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 구명하고, 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 브라켓전단결합강도와 치과교정용 레진접착제의 그것과 비교하기 위하여 시행하였다. 발거된 사람소구치의 법랑질표면을 $10\%$ 폴리아크릴산용액, $38\%$ 인산용액과 퍼미스로 처리한 후, 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 일종, 화학중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 일종 및 화학중합형 치과교정용 레진접착제의 일종으로 법랑질표면에 금속브라켓을 접착하고, $37^{\circ}C$의 증류수속에 24시간 침지시킨후, 브라켓전단결합강도를 측정하고, 접착파정패턴을 관찰하였으며, 표면처리된 법랑질표면을 주사전자현미경으로 관철하여 다음과 같은 결과와 결론을 얻었다. 1. 표면처리방법에 관계없이 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 브라켓전단결합강도는 화학중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 그것보다 높았다. 2. $38\%$ 인산용액과 $10\%$ 폴리아크릴산용액은 퍼미 스보다 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 브라켓전단결합강도를 높였다. 3. 주사전자현미경 관찰에서 $10\%$ 폴리아크릴산용액은 법랑질표면을 미약하게 부식시키고 청결하게 하였으며, $38\%$ 인산용액은 법랑질을 심하게 부식시켰고, 퍼미스를 이용한 세마는 법랑질표면에 불규칙한 흠집을 만들고 청결하지 못한 표면을 만들었다. 4. $10\%$ 폴리아크릴산용액으로 표면조건화된 법랑질에 대한 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트의 브라켓 전단결합강도는 $38\%$ 인산용액으로 부식된 법랑질에 대한 치과교정용 레진접착제의 그것과 유의차가 없었다. 이상의 결과는 $10\%$폴리아크릴산용액으로 표면조건화시킨 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 시멘트에 의한 브라켓접착은 통상적으로 사용되어온 치과교정용 레진접착제에 의한 브라켓 접착을 대체할 수 있음을 시사한다.