Bioavailability Evaluation of Two Ceftriaxone Formulations Using Two Way Crossover Design in Voluteers

  • Published : 1995.08.01

Abstract

For the vioequivalence study of two ceftriaxone injection formulations ($Rocephin{\circledR}$ ; Roche, and Triaxone ; Hanmi0, the HPLC analytical method for the analysis of ceftriaxone in plasma was used. Fourteen healthy volunteers completed the study and each subject were IM in jected signle doses (1 g) of the test and the reference formulations in a two-way crossover design with an one week drug free interval between doses. Following each administration, plasma concentrations of ceftrixone were monitored over a period of 24 h. Bioequivalence parameters $AUC_{24th}, {\;}T_{max}, {\;}C_{max}$ and MRT determined from the data obtained for the two formulations were examined by analyses of variance (ANOVA) and other criteria and tests for bioequivalence. Results of ANOVA and confidence limits of test/reference ratios of $AUC_{24th}, {\;}T_{max}, {\;}C_{max}$ and MRT, and statistical tests indicated the bioequivalence of the two formulations (i.e., test/reference ratio was within $100{\pm}20%$) except for $T_{max}$ The mean of $T_{max}$ showed only 6. 9% difference from the reference but the detection limit was 22.5% which is slightly over the 20% criteria. No pharmacokinetic parameters including Ka, Kel, Vd and Cl indicated significant difference in between the two fomulations. It was concluded that the data yielded fro the two cefriaxone formulations demonstrated that they were bioequivalent.

Keywords

References

  1. Analysis of Variance: Pharmaceutical Statistics Bolton,S.
  2. Chemotherapy v.31 Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Ceftriaxone after Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration Borner,K.;Lode,H.;Hampel,B.;Pfeuffer,M.;Koeppe,P.
  3. Computer Methods and Program in Biomedicine v.23 A microcomputer program for modelling and simulation of pharmacokinetic data Bourne,D.W.A.;Multiforate
  4. Design and analysis of bioequivalence studies Power and samples size determination Chow,S.C.;Liu,J.P.
  5. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. v.9 A study of the relationship between dose and pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone Findlay,C.;Brown,R.M.;Allcock,J.E.;Lowe,P.A.;Wise,R.
  6. Pharmacokinetics Absorption Kinetics and bioavailability Gibaldi,M.;Perrier,D.
  7. Antimicrobiol Agents The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics Gilman,A.G.;Theodore,W.Rall;Nies,A.S.;Taylor,P.;Mendell,G.L.;(ed.);Sande, M. A.(Ed.);Goodman;Guilman's
  8. J. Pharmacokinetics v.14 Effect of Caffeine on Ceftriaxone Disposition and Plasma portein binding in the Rat Kwon,K.I.;Bourne,D.W.A.
  9. Drug Information Handbook Ceftriaxone Sodium Lacy,C.;Armstrong,L.L.;Lipsy,R.J.;Lance,L.L.
  10. Br. J. Clin. Pharmac. v.14 Billary excretion of amoxycillin and ceftriaxone after intravenous administration in man Maudgal,D.P.;Maxwell,J.D.
  11. AHFS Drug Information McEvoy,G.K.;Litvak,K.;M. S.;Welsh,O.H.;J.cephalosporins
  12. Biometrics v.30 Apackage of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling Meyers,B.R.;Srulevith,E.S.;Jacobson,J.
  13. J. Pharmaceut. Sciences v.79 no.3 Bioequivalence of two thorazine tablet formulations using radioimmunoassay and GC-Mass spectrometric methods Midha,K.K.;McKay,G.;Chakraborty,G.S.;Young,M.;Hawes,E.M.
  14. National Institute of Health Safety in Korea Official guideline No. 2 on bioequivalence study
  15. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. v.20 Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in humans Patel,I.H.;Chen,S.;Parsonnet,M.;Hackman,M.R.;Brooks,M.A.;Konikoff,J.;Kalplan,S.
  16. Antibacterial Agents: Martindale Reynolds,J.E.F.
  17. Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Shargel,L.;Yu,A.B.C.
  18. Cli, Pharmacol. Ther. v.29 Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics Stoeckel,K.;McNamara,P.J.;Brandt,R.;Plozza-Nottebrock,H.;Zieger,W.
  19. Infection v.13 Pharmacology of Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone Wise,R.;Wright,N.