DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

INFLUENCE OF DIRECT-FED MICROBIALS ON RUMINAL MICROBIAL FERMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE OF RUMINANTS: A REVIEW

  • Yoon, I.K. (Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Stern, M.D. (Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota)
  • 투고 : 1994.11.28
  • 심사 : 1995.06.20
  • 발행 : 1995.12.01

초록

Direct-fed microbials (DFM) have been used to enhance milk production in lactating cattle and to increase feed efficiency and body weight gain in growing ruminants. Primary microorganisms that have been used as DFM for ruminants are fungal cultures including Aspergillus oryzae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus or Streptococcus. Attempts have been made to determine the basic mechanisms describing beneficial effects of DFM supplements. Various modes of action for DFM have been suggested including : stimulation of ruminal microbial growth, stabilization of ruminal pH, changes in ruminal microbial fermentation pattern, increases in digestibility of nutrients ingested, greater nutrient flow to the small intestine, greater nutrient retention and alleviation of stress, however, these responses have not been observed consistently. Variations in microbial supplements, dosage level, production level and age of the animal, diet and environmental condition or various combinations of the above may partially explain the inconsistencies in response. This review summarizes production responses that have been observed under various conditions with supplemental DFM and also corresponding modification of ruminal fermentation and other changes in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminant animals.

키워드

피인용 문헌

  1. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives vol.34, pp.5, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01092.x
  2. Desempenho de novilhos suplementados com sais proteinados em pastagem nativa vol.40, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2005000800008
  3. Effects of Yeast Culture and Galacto-Oligosaccharides on Ruminal Fermentation in Holstein Cows vol.88, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72808-3
  4. Effect of Direct-Fed Microbials on Performance, Diet Digestibility, and Rumen Characteristics of Holstein Dairy Cows vol.90, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-643
  5. O157 and F5 vol.106, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03959.x
  6. Measurement and prediction of enteric methane emission vol.55, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0356-7
  7. Review: The use of direct fed microbials to mitigate pathogens and enhance production in cattle vol.91, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas10047
  8. Effects of Dietary Addition of Bentonite and Probiotics on Meat Characteristics and Health of Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) Steers fed Rice Straw As a Sole Roughage Source (a Field Study) vol.32, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.4.387
  9. In vitro assessment of ruminal fermentation characteristics of tropical browse mixtures supplemented with yeast vol.58, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-697X.2011.00236.x
  10. ) to Improve Nutrients Availability of Diet with In Vitro Rumen Microbial Fermentation Test vol.33, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.3.206
  11. O157 in commercial feedlot cattle vol.93, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2013-100
  12. Evaluation of fermented Alisma canaliculatum with probiotics as potential feed additives for finishing Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae) steers vol.54, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13160
  13. Effect of Feeding a Mixed Microbial Culture Fortified with Trace Minerals on the Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Late-fattening Hanwoo Steers: A Field Study vol.28, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0101
  14. fermentation of cereal straws vol.87, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12346
  15. Performance of crossbred dairy Friesian calves fed two levels of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, blood parameters and faecal pathogenic bacteria vol.154, pp.08, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000599
  16. Dietary supplementation of a bacteriocinogenic and probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium CCM7420 and its effect on the mineral content and quality of Musculus longissimus dorsi in rabbits vol.56, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15094
  17. Effect of feeding mixed microbial culture fortified with trace minerals on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen and trace mineral balance in Sheep vol.58, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-016-0102-8
  18. Role of probiotics in rumen fermentation and animal performance: A review vol.7, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2016.0285
  19. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle1,2 vol.80, pp.7, 2002, https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8071977x
  20. Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle1,2 vol.81, pp.6, 2003, https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8161628x
  21. Effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on digestibility and fermentation end-products in horses fed low- and high-starch concentrates1 vol.86, pp.10, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0608
  22. Effect of disodium/calcium malate or Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on growth performance, carcass quality, ruminal fermentation products, and blood metabolites of heifers1 vol.94, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0616
  23. Effects of Selected Lactobacillus plantarum as Probiotic on In vitro Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Population vol.17, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2018.131.139
  24. Invitro Study on the Fluid From Banana Stem Bioprocess as Direct Fed Microbial vol.119, pp.1755-1315, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/119/1/012009
  25. In vitro study of postbiotics from Lactobacillus plantarum RG14 on rumen fermentation and microbial population vol.47, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720170255
  26. Animal performance and nutrient digestibility of feedlot steers fed a diet supplemented with a mixture of direct-fed microbials and digestive enzymes vol.47, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720170121
  27. Review: Enhancing gastrointestinal health in dairy cows pp.1751-732X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001921
  28. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition vol.10, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0
  29. Use of a direct-fed microbial product as a supplement during the transition period in dairy cattle vol.97, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8248
  30. 복합생균제 첨가가 버섯부산물의 화학적 성분 변화와 발효 저장성에 미치는 영향 vol.50, pp.6, 1995, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2008.50.6.831
  31. Direct-fed Microbials for Ruminant Animals vol.23, pp.12, 1995, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.r.08
  32. Effect of Feeding Direct-fed Microbial as an Alternative to Antibiotics for the Prophylaxis of Calf Diarrhea in Holstein Calves vol.24, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10322
  33. Redundancy, resilience, and host specificity of the ruminal microbiota: implications for engineering improved ruminal fermentations vol.6, pp.None, 1995, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00296
  34. Direct-Fed Microbial: Beneficial Applications, Modes of Action and Prospects as a Safe Tool for Enhancing Ruminant Production and Safeguarding Health vol.12, pp.3, 1995, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2016.220.231
  35. Microbial Feed Supplements for Ruminant’s Performance Enhancement vol.10, pp.1, 1995, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajar.2016.1.14
  36. Short-term Supplementation with a Trace Mineral-fortified Microbial Culture May Increase Trace Minerals in Longissimus dorsi Muscle and Prevent Incidence of Urolithiasis in Finishing Hanwoo Steers vol.36, pp.3, 1995, https://doi.org/10.5333/kgfs.2016.36.3.191
  37. The Effect of Peroral Administration of Lactobacillus Fermentum Culture on Dairy Cows Health Indices vol.41, pp.2, 1995, https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2018-0017
  38. Recombinant Technologies to Improve Ruminant Production Systems: The Past, Present and Future vol.8, pp.12, 1995, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121633
  39. Evaluating the effects of Lactobacillus animalis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii on performance and rumen and fecal measures in lactating dairy cows vol.104, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19291
  40. Effects of bacterial cultures, enzymes, and yeast-based feed additive combinations on ruminal fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system vol.5, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab026
  41. Adaptation and withdrawal of feeding dried Aspergillus oryzae fermentation product to dairy cattle and goats on in vitro NDF digestibility of selected forage sources vol.5, pp.2, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab051
  42. Effect of mixed live yeast and lactic acid bacteria on in vitro fermentation with varying media pH using a high-grain or high-forage diet vol.101, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2020-0138
  43. Ruminococcus bovis sp. nov., a novel species of amylolytic Ruminococcus isolated from the rumen of a dairy cow vol.71, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004924
  44. The effect of synbiotics and probiotics on the growth performance, gastrointestinal function and health status of turkeys vol.75, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039x.2021.1958646
  45. Effect of Enterococcus faecium AL41 (CCM8558) and Its Enterocin M on the Physicochemical Properties and Mineral Content of Rabbit Meat vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111045