A THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF OSSEOINTEGRATED PROSTHESIS ACCORDING TO THE LOCATION AND LENGTH OF CANTILEVER

골유착성 임플랜트 보철물의 캔틸레버 위치와 길이변화에 따른 삼차원 유한요소법적 응력분석

  • Jang, Bok-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 장복숙 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학 교실) ;
  • 김창회 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학 교실) ;
  • 김영수 (서울대학교 치과대학 보철학 교실)
  • Published : 1996.09.01

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of cantilever length, location and load condition on stress distribution developed in the implants, prostheses and supporting tissues. The osseointegrated prostheses with two 10mm Branemark implants at 2nd premolar and 1st molar sites with cantilever extensions at 1st premolar, 2nd and 3rd molar sites were constructed. Under 100N, 200N of vertical and $45^{\circ}$ oblique loads at the cantilever pontics, stress distribution patterns and displacement were analyzed with three dimensional finite element method. The results were as follows : 1. The stress was concentrated at the joint of the cantilever pontic and implant superstructure, the neck of implant and the ridge crest near the cantilever But there was little load transfer to the lower supporting tissues of implants. 2. The implant near the cantilever was displaced inferiorly while the implant far from the cantilever was displaced superiorly. In horizontal direction the implants were displaced to the direction where the loads were applied, except the apexes of the implants. 3. In case of anterior cantilever, the stress and displacement were higher than the prosthesis connected with natural tooth. 4. The stress developed in the posterior cantilevered type was higher than in the anterior cantilevered type. The greastest stress was concentrated at the ridge crest near the posterior cantilever. 5. The longer the cantilever, the more the stress was developed and was concentrated at the joint of the cantilever pontic and implant superstructure. 6. Under oblique load, the stress was concentrated at the necks of implants and the ridge crests, but decreased at the joint of the cantilever pontic and implant superstructure than under vertical load.

Keywords