DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Earthquake ductility and overstrength in residential structures

  • Gad, E.F. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne) ;
  • Chandler, A.M. (Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Duffield, C.F. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne) ;
  • Hutchinson, G.L. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne)
  • Published : 1999.10.25

Abstract

This paper reviews aspects of current design procedures for seismic design of structures, and specifically examines their relevance to the design of light framed residential buildings under earthquake loading. The significance of the various structural contributions made by the components of cold formed steel framed residential structures subjected to earthquake induced loadings has been investigated. This is a common form of residential construction worldwide. Particular attention is given to aspects related to ductility and overstrength, the latter arising principally from the contributions of the designated "non-structural" components. Based on both analytical and experimental data obtained from research investigations on steel framed residential structures, typical ranges of the ductility reduction factor and overstrength ratios are determined. It is concluded that the latter parameter has a very significant influence on the seismic design of such structures. Although the numerical ranges for the inelastic seismic parameters given in this paper were obtained for Australian houses, the concepts and the highlighted aspects of seismic design methodology are more widely applicable.

Keywords

References

  1. Barton, A.D. (1997), "Performance of cold formed steel frames when subjected to earthquake loading" , Ph.D thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  2. Carr, A.J. (1996), RUAUMOKO. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Canterbury University. New Zealand.
  3. Cooney, R.C. and Collins, M.J. (1988), A Wall Bracing Test and Evaluation Procedure, Building Research Association of New Zealand (BRANZ), Technical Paper P21. Judgeford.
  4. EEFIT (Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team) (1991), The Newcastle, Australia Earthquake of December 1989, ed. Pappin J.W., Chandler, A.M. and Couburn, A., Institution of Structural Engineers, London.
  5. Elghadamsi, E.F. and Mohraz, B. (1987), "Inelastic earthquake spectra", J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150107
  6. Experimental Building Station. (1978), Guidelines for testing and evaluation of products for cyclone-prone areas. Technical record 440, Recommendations of a workshop held during July 1977, Department of Construction, James Cook University, Australia.
  7. Gad, E.F. (1997), "Performance of Brick-Veneer cold-formed steel-framed domestic structures when subjected to earthquake loading" , Ph.D thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  8. Gad, E.F., Duffield, C.F., Stark, G. and Pham, L. (1995), "Contribution of non-structural components to the dynamic performance of domestic framed structures" , Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 177-186.
  9. Gad, E.F., Duffield, C.F., Mansell, D.S. and Stark, G. (1997), "Modelling of plasterboard lined domestic steel frames when subjected to lateral loads" , Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, University of Melbourne, Australia, 331- 337.
  10. Gad, E.F., Duffield, C.F., Chandler, A.M. and Stark, G. (1998), "Testing of cold-formed steel-framed domestic structures", Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France.
  11. Gad, E.F., Duffield, C.F., Hutchinson, G.L., Mansell, D.S. and Stark, G. (1999), "Lateral performance of cold-formed steel-framed domestic structures" , Eng. Struct., 21(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)90129-2
  12. International Conference of Building Officials (1994), Uniform Building Code. Whittier. California.
  13. King, A.B. and Lim, K.Y.S. (1991), Supplement to P21: An evaluation method of P21 test results for use with NZS 3604:1990, Building Research Association of New Zealand (BRANZ), Technical Report, Judgeford.
  14. Lam, N.T.K, Wilson, J.L. and Hutchinson, G.L. (1995), "The independence of ductility demand on the frequency characteristics of earthquake ground motion", Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 290- 295.
  15. Lam, N.T.K, Wilson, J.L. and Hutchinson, G.L. (1997), "Seismic strength and ductility provisions for building structures in Australia", Proceedings of the Technical Conference of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wairakei, New Zealand, 96-103.
  16. Mahin, S.A. and Bertero, V.V. (1981), "An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra", J. Struc. Eng. ASCE, 107(9), 1777-1795.
  17. Miranda, E. (1993), "Evaluation of site-dependant inelastic seismic design spectra", J. Struc. Eng., ASCE, 119(5), 1319-1338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319)
  18. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982), Earthquake Spectra and Design. Engineering Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California.
  19. Park, R. (1989), "Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing", Bulletin NZ National Society Earthquake Eng., 22(3), 155-166.
  20. Phillips, T.L., Itani, R.Y. and McLean, D.I. (1993), "Lateral load shearing by diaphragms in wood framed buildings" , J. Struc. Eng., ASCE, 119(5), 1556-1571. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1556)
  21. Priestley, M.J.N. (1997), "Displacement-based seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings" , J. Earthquake Eng., 1, 157-192.
  22. Standards Association of Australia (1993), Minimum Design Loads on Structures, Part 4: Earthquake Loads, AS1170.4. Sydney, Australia.
  23. Standards Association of New Zealand (1990), Code of Practice for Light Timber Frame Buildings Not Requiring Specific Design, NZS3604. Wellington, New Zealand.
  24. Standards Association of New Zealand (1992). Code of Practice for General Structural Design and Design Loadings for Buildings, NZS4203. Wellington, New Zealand.
  25. Uang, C.M. (1991), "Establishing R and $C_{d}$ factors for building seismic provisions" , J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 117(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19)
  26. Sugiyama, H., Uchisako, T., Andoh, N., Arima, T., Hirano, S. and Nakamura, N. (1988), "Comparison of Lateral Stiffness of Frame Obtained From Full-Scale Test and That Estimated by Racking Tests in Japanese Type of Wooden Frame Construction", Proceedings of the International Conference on Timber Engineering, Forest Products Research Society, Madison, Wis., 804-810.

Cited by

  1. Numerical Study on Seismic Performance of Cold Formed Steel Sheathed Shear Walls vol.18, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.18.11.1819
  2. Analytical Analysis of Seismic Behavior of Cold-Formed Steel Frames with Strap Brace and Sheathings Plates vol.2014, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/535120
  3. Cyclic behavior of prefabricated circular composite columns with low steel ratio vol.33, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.024
  4. Bending resistance of I-section bamboo–steel composite beams utilizing adhesive bonding vol.89, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.007
  5. Inelastic performance of screw-connected cold-formed steel strap-braced walls vol.35, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1139/L07-081
  6. Performance of wall-stud cold-formed shear panels under monotonic and cyclic loading vol.42, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00063-6
  7. A numerical study on seismic performance of strap-braced cold-formed steel shear walls vol.60, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2012.05.012
  8. Inelastic performance of cold-formed steel strap braced walls vol.63, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.040
  9. Cyclic Loading Tests on Framed Stud Walls with Strap Braces and Steel Sheathing vol.141, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001133
  10. An experimental investigation on the lateral behavior of knee-braced cold-formed steel shear walls vol.51, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.11.008
  11. Inelastic behavior of cold-formed braced walls under monotonic and cyclic loading vol.7, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-015-0091-8
  12. Behavior and performance of cold-formed steel-framed houses under seismic action vol.64, pp.7-8, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.029
  13. Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section vol.30, pp.12, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.005
  14. Seismic performance of cold formed steel walls sheathed by fibre-cement board panels vol.107, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.003
  15. Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Strap-Braced Cold-Formed Steel Shear Walls vol.16, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.2.245
  16. A numerical study on seismic characteristics of knee-braced cold formed steel shear walls vol.49, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.07.012
  17. Seismic characteristics of K-braced cold-formed steel shear walls vol.77, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.04.009
  18. Performance of wall-stud cold-formed shear panels under monotonic and cyclic loading vol.42, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00064-8
  19. Seismic Behavior of Sheathed Cold-Formed Structures: Numerical Study vol.132, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:4(558)
  20. Experimental and Analytical Validation of a Fastener Bearing Test as a Means of Evaluating the Bracing Characteristics of Plasterboard vol.9, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1260/136943306777641931
  21. Cyclic response of concrete-encased composite columns with low steel ratio vol.161, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2008.161.2.77
  22. 주철근 겹침이음된 실물교각의 횡구속 정도에 따른 내진성능 평가 vol.16, pp.5, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4334/jkci.2004.16.5.687
  23. 주철근 겹침이음된 실물 비내진 원형 교각의 내진성능평가 vol.16, pp.5, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4334/jkci.2004.16.5.697
  24. 중실원형단면 조립식 교각의 내진 성능 평가 vol.11, pp.3, 1999, https://doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2007.11.3.023