The research on the disease classifications of the traditional medicine in Korea

한국 한의학 질병사인분류 체계에 관한 연구

  • Choi Sun-Mi (Medical Research & Development Team, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Park Geong-Mo (Dept. of Engineerings in Oriental Medicine, School of Electonics and Information, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Shin Min-Kyu (Dept. of Oriental physiology the College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Shin Hyeun-Kyoo (Management & Planning Team, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 최선미 (한국한의학연구원 의료연구팀) ;
  • 박경모 (경희대학교 한방시스템공학과) ;
  • 신민규 (경희대학교 한의과대학 생리학교실) ;
  • 신현규 (한국한의학연구원)
  • Published : 2000.12.29

Abstract

Korea follows the Korea standard classification of disease and causes of death according to the ICD(international classification of disease) Oriental medicine began to of officially follow the classification of disease for using the Korean classification of diseases in 1972. The classification of OM(oriental medicine) has changed in shape experiencing two amendments. The largest difficulty was to overcome the different names of diseases between OM and ICD. A one-to-one correspondence of the name of a disease between OM and ICD is impossible So in the primary stage one-to-one and one-to-many correspondence was made. During the first amendment the international disease names were re-classified on the oriental medicine disease name's basis and at the same time the classification of OM was corresponded on a one-to-one basis to the ICD . During the second amendment this changed to many-to-many correspondence . Analyzing the history of classification of OM during the first and second amendments, it was discovered that establishment of the standards of classification, the unification of oriental medical terms, and overcoming the difference of disease names between the OM and ICD is necessary Also th classification and standardazation of OM must not stop as a single round. It must go on for a long time. The hosts of this project Korean oriental medical society and AKOM(association of korean oriental medicine) need to build a independant department which will supervise the classification project and monitor any problems to come up. Also a route through which suggestions can be taken in and new solutions can be brought up needs to be secured and an atmosphere in which studies can take place about the basis of classifications needs to be developed.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국질병사인분류 대한한의학회
  2. 한국표준질병사인분류(제2권 지침서) 대한의무기록협회
  3. 의무기록관리학 홍준현
  4. 한국표준질병사인분류(한의) 경제기획원
  5. 한국표준질병사인분류(한의) 대한한의사협회
  6. 동아새漢韓사전 동아출판사 편집국(편)
  7. 東醫寶鑑 許浚(著)
  8. 동양의학대사전 전통의학연구소
  9. 中國醫學大辭典卷四 謝觀
  10. 보건복지부학술용역보고서 한방표준질병사인분류기준제정(안)에 관한 연구 한국한의학연구원
  11. 구독자여러분께 한국질병사인분류 이종형
  12. 하눅표준질병사인분류(한의) 기준개정을 위한 토론회 자료집 한의질병사인분류의 목적과 방법 김현수
  13. 한방 표준질병명과 기준처방 작성연구 보건복지부
  14. 한국한의학연구원연구보고서 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화 연구 I 한국한의학연구원
  15. 한국한의학연구원연구보고서 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화 연구 II 한국한의학연구원
  16. 한국한의학연구원연구보고서 한의진단명과 진단요건의 표준화 연구 III 한국한의학연구원