Molecular Biologic Study on the Role of Glutamate in Spinal Sensitization

척수통증과민반응에서 Glutamate의 역할에 대한 분자생물학적 연구

  • Kim, Hae-Kyu (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung, Jin-Sup (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Baik, Seong-Wan (Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 김해규 (부산대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실) ;
  • 정진섭 (부산대학교 의과대학 생리학교실) ;
  • 백승완 (부산대학교 의과대학 마취과학교실)
  • Published : 2001.06.30

Abstract

Background: Subcutaneous injection of 5% formalin into the hind paw of the rat produces a biphasic nociceptive response. The second phase depends on changes in the dorsal horn cell function that occur shortly after an initial C-fiber discharge, spinal sensitization, or windup phenomenon. This study was performed to investigate the role of glutamate during spinal sensitization. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200 to 250 g were used for this study. Under light anesthesia (0.5% isoflurane) the rats were segregated in a specially designed cage and $50{\mu}l$ 0.5% formalin was injected subcutaneously in the foot dorsum of right hindlimb. Forty minutes after the formalin injection, the rat was quickly decapitated and spinal cord was removed. The spinal segments at the level of L3 (largest area) was collected and stored in a deep freezer ($-70^{\circ}C$). The mRNA gene expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) were determined by the polymerase chain reaction. Results: The number of flinches was $19.8{\pm}2.3/min$. at one minute after formalin injection and decreased to zero after then. The second peak appeared at 35 and 40 minutes after formalin injection. The values were $17.8{\pm}2.2$ and $17.2{\pm}3.0/min$. The mRNA gene expressions of NMDAR and mGluR5 were increased by $459.0{\pm}46.8%$ (P < 0.01) and $111.1{\pm}4.8%$ (P > 0.05) respectively at 40 minutes after formalin injection. The increased rate of NMDAR was significantly higher than that of mGluR5 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: From these results it suggested that NMDAR partly contributed to the mechanism of central sensitization after the formalin test but mGluR5 did not.

Keywords