An Economic Analysis of the Enforcement of illegal Fishing in Traditional Fisheries Management

전통적 어업관리의 불법어업 감시·감독에 대한 경제학적 분석

  • Published : 2002.07.31

Abstract

Illegal fishing is often cited as a principal cause of the failure of fisheries management, expecially fishing efforts regulations in traditional fisheries management. Usually, illegal fishing problems are perceived to be equivalent to inadequate enforcement, and policy prescription then follow to strengthen enforcement programs. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the illegal fishing behavior relatively recent emphasis on fishing efforts regulations in traditional fisheries management. The analysis focuses on measuring, explaining and developing the effectiveness way of enforcement strategies responding to imperfectly managed fishing efforts regulations through illegal fishing behavior and avoid enforcement fishing efforts measures. A model of fishermen fishing behavior and profit-maximizing decision making is analyzed to determine optimal fishing at individual fisherman level in response to fishing efforts regulation. The results of economic analysis of the enforcement of illegal fishing in traditional fisheries management results are as follows: First, illegal fishing will occur only if enforcement effort is not so high as to remove the incentive to do so, and if the effectiveness of avoidance is not too great, nor its cost too low. Second, avoidance effort will occur at a level jointly proportional to the extent of illegal activity and of enforcement; for given levels of the latter, the desired avoidance effort increase with its effectiveness and decrease with its cost Third, to improve the effectiveness of enforcement, understanding avoidance behavior appears to be crucial to any efforts. Forth, enforcement and fishermen behavior interact depends strongly on characteristics of avoidance, specifically its cost and effectiveness. When avoidance is neither too cheap nor too effective, the interaction is regular. Fifth, in this case, at low levels of enforcement, fishers respond to increases in enforcement by increasing avoidance, but at higher enforcement levels, it becomes uneconomical to continue to do so, and avoidance decreases with enforcement. Sixth, illegal fishing activity decreases steadily with enforcement, so the fishery manager is able, in theory, to reduce illegal fishing toward zero by increasing enforcement. If, however, avoidance is very inexpensive and/or very efficient/ then the optimal level of avoidance will increase indefinitely with increasing enforcement. Finally, less fishery enforcement is required if fishermen have less incentive to overfish, and fishermen have less incentive to avoid fishery enforcement measures.

Keywords

References

  1. 이상고, 어업관리경제학 특론 II, 부경대학교 대학원 수산경영학과 강의교재, 2001
  2. 이상고, 효율적인 어업관리를 위한 감시.감독체제 구축과 옵서버 운영에 관한 연구, 어업 관리 감시.감독과 옵서버 운영에 대한 워크샵, 한국수산회, 부경대학교, 2002
  3. 이상고.김도훈, 어업관리 옵서버 제도의 효과에 대한 생물경제학적 분석, 수산경영론집, 제33권 제1호, 2002, pp.1-18
  4. Armacost, R. L. Nonlinear Programming Model for Coast Guard Fisheries Law Enforcement Aircraft Patrols, European Journal of Operational Research, 56:13, 1992, pp.4-145
  5. Becker, G. S. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 1968, pp.169-212 https://doi.org/10.1086/259394
  6. Carles, A. T., ed. Fishery Enforcement: Economic Analysis and Operational Models, Halifax: Oceans Institute of Canada, 1993
  7. Carolyn Carolyn Deere, Net Gains: Linking Fisheries Management, International Trade and Sustainable Development, IUCN, Washington, D.C., 2000
  8. Croeley, R. W., and H. P. Palsson, Modeling Offshore Fishery Regulation Enforcement in Canada, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science, 12:15, 1992, pp.3-90
  9. FAO, The International Conference on Integrated Fisheries Monitoring, (Sydney, Australia, 1-5 Feb.) Rome, 1999
  10. Flewwelling P., An introduction to monitoring, control and surveillance systems for capture fisheries, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 338, Rome, 1994
  11. Furlong, W. J. The Deterrent Effect of Regulatory Enforcement in the Fishery, Land Economics, 67, 1991, pp.116-129 https://doi.org/10.2307/3146490
  12. Jentoft, S., 'Models of fishery development:The cooperative approach', Marine Policy, Vol.9, No.4, 1985, pp.322-331 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(85)90040-5
  13. Jentoft, S. and T. Kristoffersen, 'Fishermens co-management: The case of the Lofoten Fishery', Human Organization, Vol.48, No-4, 1998, pp.355-365
  14. Lepiz, L. G., and J. G. Sutinen, Surveillance and Enforcement Operations in the Costa Rican Tuna Fishery, Marine Policy, 9, 1985, pp.310-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(85)90039-9
  15. Milliman, S. R. Optimal Fishery Management in the Presence of Illegal Activity, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13(3), 1986, pp.363-381 https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(86)90006-9
  16. Ragnar Amason, 'Efficient management of ocean fisheries', European Economic Review, 35, 1991, pp.408-417 https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90142-6
  17. Rognvaldur Hannesson, Fisheries Mismanagement: The Case of the North Atlantic Cod, Fising News Books, Oxford, U.K., 1996
  18. Ragnar Amason의 'Efficient management of ocean fisheries'(European Economic Review, 35, 408-417, North-Holland), 1991
  19. Sutinen, J. G., and P. Anderson, The Economics of Fisheries Law Enforcement, Land Economics, 61, 1985, 273-281
  20. Sutinen, J. G., and J. Gauvin, An Economic Study of Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance in the Commercial Inshore Lobster Fishery of massachusetts, Right-Based Fishing, P. A. Neher, R. Amason, and N. Mollett, eds., pp.415-428, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989
  21. Sutinen, J. G., and T. M. Hennessey, Enforcement: The Neglected Element in Fishing Management, Natural Resources Economics and Policy Applications, E Miles, R. Pealy, and R. Stockes, eds., pp. 185-213, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1986
  22. Wilen, J. G. towards a Theory of the Regulated Fishery, Marine Resource Economics, 1(4), 1985, pp.369-388 https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.1.4.42628868