DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Disrupting Escherichia coli: A Comparison of Methods

  • Benov, Ludmil (The Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University) ;
  • Al-Ibraheem, Jameela (The Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University)
  • 발행 : 2002.07.31

초록

The often-encountered problem of disrupting bacteria for the purpose of extracting soluble protein has generated various methods. Many require specialized equipment. Very often, especially during preliminary studies, investigators need a simple, fast, and inexpensive method for cell disruption that preserves biological activity. This paper compares some simple and inexpensive methods for cell disruption, such as bead-vortexing, freesing-thawing, French pressing, and sonication. It also provides some tips to increase protein yield and preserve biological activity. If performed under optimal conditions, bead-vortexing gives protein yields that are comparable to French pressing and sonication. It also preserves the activities of labile enzymes and releases periplasmic enzymes. Vortexing with glass beads appears to be the simplest method for cell disruption.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Benov, L., Sage, H. and Fridovich, I. (1997) The copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase from Escherichia coli: Molecular weight and stability. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 340, 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1997.9940
  2. Gardner, P. and Fridovich, I. (1991) Superoxide sensitivity of the Escherichia coli aconitase. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19328-19333.
  3. Gardner, P. and Fridovich, I. (1992) Inactivation-reactivation of aconitase in Escherichia coli. A sensitive measure of superoxide radical. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19328-19333.
  4. Hasan, N. and Nester, E. (1978) Dehydroquinate synthase in Bacillus subtilis. An enzyme associated with chorismate synthase and flavin reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 253, 4999-5004.
  5. Hayashi, S. and Lin, R. C. C. (1967) Purification and properties of glycerol kinase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 212, 1030-1035.
  6. Imlay, I. and Linn, S. (1987) Mutagenesis and stress response induced in Escherichia coli by hydrogen peroxide. J. Bacteriol. 169, 2967-2976. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.169.7.2967-2976.1987
  7. Liochev, S. and Fridovich, I. (1993) Modulation of the fumarases of Escherichia coli in response to oxidative stress. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 301, 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1993.1159
  8. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. F., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Bioi. Chem. 193, 265-275.
  9. McCord, J. M. and Fridovich I. (1969) Superoxide dismutase: An enzymatic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J. Biol. Chem. 244, 6049-6055
  10. Song, D. D. and Jacques, N. A. (1997) Cell disruption of Escherichia coli by glass bead stirring for the recovery of recombinant proteins. Anal. Biochem. 248, 300-301. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1997.2149
  11. Woods, S. A., Schwartzbach, S. D. and Guest, J. R. (1988) Two biochemically distinct classes of fumarase in Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 954, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4838(88)90050-7

피인용 문헌

  1. Development of an in Vitro Assay for the Proteolytic Processing of the CDP/Cux Transcription Factor vol.36, pp.4, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2003.36.4.390
  2. Gene cloning, purification, and characterization of recombinant DNA ligases of the thermophilic archaea Pyrococcus abyssi and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum vol.45, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1134/S002689331102021X
  3. Comparisons of protein extraction procedures and quantification methods for the proteomic analysis of Gram-positive Paenibacillus sp. strain D9 vol.27, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0621-2
  4. In search of an effective cell disruption method to isolate intact mitochondria from Chinese hamster ovary cells vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201200182
  5. Expression of a glutathione reductase from Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis enhanced cellular redox homeostasis by modulating antioxidant proteins in Escherichia coli vol.28, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-009-0168-y
  6. Comparison of chemical washing and physical cell-disruption approaches to assess the surface adsorption and internalization of cadmium by Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 vol.273, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.004
  7. Medium from γ-irradiated Escherichia coli bacteria stimulates a unique immune response in Drosophila cells vol.46, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2014.05.018
  8. The performance of a glass bead shaking technique for the disruption of Escherichia coli cells vol.13, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-008-0047-y
  9. Enzymatic cyanide degradation by cell-free extract ofRhodococcusUKMP−5M vol.50, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.987524
  10. Disruption of Pseudomonas putida by high pressure homogenization: a comparison of the predictive capacity of three process models for the efficient release of arginine deiminase vol.6, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0260-6
  11. A bactericidal microfluidic device constructed using nano-textured black silicon vol.6, pp.31, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA03864F
  12. Borrelia burgdorferi RNA Induces Type I and III Interferons via Toll-Like Receptor 7 and Contributes to Production of NF- B-Dependent Cytokines vol.82, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01617-14
  13. vol.9, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00583-18
  14. Ultra-sonication application in biodiesel production from heterotrophic oleaginous microorganisms vol.38, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1418733
  15. vol.49, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2018.1536988