Evaluation Descriptions and Dimension on the Sensibility of Internet Fashion Shopping Mall

인터넷 패션 쇼핑몰에 대한 감성단어추출과 평가차원

  • Published : 2002.01.01

Abstract

The Purpose of this study was to identify the sensibility elements and the evaluative dimensions of internet fashion shopping mall to supply optimal experience to the customer. First, association words for internet fashion shopping mall by open-ended method and sensibility-expression-adjective feeling as navigating personally 57 shopping mall dealing with fashion products were collected. Collected adjectives were ranked after making index by frequency and diversity. Then, correlation analysis was executed to extract independent adjective and their opposite words. Semantic differential scale was made for internet-fashion-shopping-mall-evaluation. After preliminary investigation with this scale, factor analysis was implemented. 12 sensibility evaluation words were extracted. Then, 200 subjects evaluated satisfaction degree for 8 selected shopping mall. To explain the hierarchy of internet fashion shopping mall, cluster analysis was applied. The understanding of sensibility element and evaluative dimensions of internet fashion shopping mall can be utilized efficiently as basic materials when marketer plans internet shopping mall design and makes marketing strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. 김유진, 이경희(2000). 의복디자인의 조형적 특성에 따른 감성 연구. 한국의류학회지, 24(7), 976-986
  2. 김윤경, 이경희(2000). 의복무늬의 시각적 감성연구 한국의류학회지, 24(6), 861-872
  3. 김진우. 문재윤(1997) 시각 디자인 요소와 감성요소 간의 상관관계에 대한 연구 -가상 은행의 고객 인터페이스를 이용하여-. 경영정보학 연구, 7(1)
  4. 김진우(2000). Internet Business.com. 영진.com
  5. 박금옥(1996). 색채와 무늬에 따른 직물의 시각적 연구 중앙대학교 박사학위논문
  6. 박수진, 조경자, 장준익, 김길님(1997) 직물디자인의 시각적 요소와 관련된 감성어휘모형. 한국감성과학회 학술대회 발표논문집. 63-68
  7. 박희석, 인치호, 장동성, 이정규(2000). 인터넷 쇼핑몰 인터페이스 구성요소 파악 및 디자인지 침에 관한 연구. 대한인간공학회 춘계학술대회 논문 발표집
  8. 안신호, 이승혜, 권오식(1993). 정서의 구조: 한국어 정서단어 분석. 한국심리학회지 사회, 7(1), 107-123
  9. 이경희(1991). 의복디자인의 평가도구 개발을 위한 연구-실루엣 평가를 중심으로. 대한 가정학회지, 29(1), 37-49
  10. 이구형(1997). 인간감성특성과 감성의 측정평가. 한국 감성과학회 학술대회, 37-42
  11. 이순요(1992). 미래지향적 인간공학. 박영사. 379
  12. 이순요, 長町三生(1996). 정보호시대의 감성인간공학. 서울: 양영각
  13. 이인자(1998). 직물문양 차이에 따른 이미지 지각. 건국대학교 샘활문화$\cdot$예술논집, 21집 , 41-54
  14. 정인희, 이은영(1992), 의복이미지의 구성요인과 평가차원에 대한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 16(4), 379-391
  15. 주소현. 이경희(1999). 의복. 배경의 조합에 따른 시각적 이미지 연구(제 1보). 한국의류학회지, 23(1), 78-89
  16. 차미승(1992). 의복형태와 색채이미지의 시각적 평가와 분석. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  17. 최재호(2000). 전자상거래 시스템에서의 인간공학적 설계대상. 대한인간공학회 춘계학술 대회논문 발표집 34-37
  18. 홍병숙(1984). 의미분별척도볍(Se mantic Differential)에 의한 양장과 한복의 이미지 비교 평가, 한국의류학회지, 12(3), 373-382
  19. 長町三生(1989) . 感性工學, 海文堂
  20. Alexander, H.H., Alexander, M.A., & Tzeng, O.C.S. (1978). Designing semantic differential scales for a universe of the near environment-ehairs. Hame economics research journal, 6(4), 293-304 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X7800600405
  21. Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of information theory to psychology, henry holt and company new york
  22. DeLong, M. R. & Lamtz, K. (1980). Measuring Visual Response to Clothing, Home Economics Research Journal, 5(8), 281-293
  23. Di Vesta, F.J. (1977). Developmental Patterns in the use of modifiers as modes of conceptualization, in snider, J.G. and osgood, C.E.(eds), semantic differential technique-a sourcebook, chicago; Aldine, 348-376
  24. Di Vesta, F.J. (1977). A Developmental Study of semantic structures of children, in snider, J.G. and osgood, C.E.(eds), semantic differential technique-a sourcebook, chicago; Aldine, 377-390
  25. Forsythe, S.M., Drake, M.F., Cox, Jr., Charles, A. (1984). Dress as an Influence on the Perceptions of Management Characteristics in Women. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 112-121 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8401300203
  26. Forsythe, S.M. (1988). Effect of Clothing Masculinity on Perceptions of Managerial Traits : Does Gender of the Perceiver Make a Difference? Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 6(2), 10-16 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8800600202
  27. Johnson, B.H, Nagasawa, RH., & Peters, K. (1977). Clothing Style Differences: Their Effect on the Impression of Sociability, Home Economics Research Journal, 6(1), 58-63 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X7700600107
  28. Osgood, CE., May, W.H., & Miron, M.S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning, urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois press, 83-92
  29. Osgood, C, Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1979). the Measurement of Meaning, Urbana, University of Illnoise Press, 1957 cited by AIken, L.R., Psychological testing and Assesment, 3rd ed., Boston:Allyn and Bacon., Inc., 237-238
  30. Sweat, S.J. & Zentner, M.A. (1985). Attributions toward Female Appearance Styles. In Michael R. Solomon (Ed.), The Psychology of Fashion. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books. 321-335
  31. Sweat, S.J. & Zentner, M.A, (1985). Female Appearance Presentation: Gender Differences in Social Attribution and Situational Choice. Home Economics Research Journal, 14(2), 176-186 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8501400119
  32. Whisney, A. (1978). Fashion Preference: Drawings versus Photographs. Home Economics Research Journal, 8(2)