International Journal of Quality Innovation

  • 제3권2호
  • /
  • Pages.57-73
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1598-2688(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2363-7021(eISSN)
한국품질경영학회 (Korean Society for Quality Management)
권호 표지

A Proposed Self-assessment Framework for Measuring and Benchmarking Organizational Performance

  • Pun, Kit-Fai (Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of the Indies) ;
  • Ho, Karis-Ka-Yan (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Sun, Hong-Yi (Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong)
  • 발행 : 2002.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Recent interests in total quality management (TQM) and business excellence (BE) had been fuelled with a range of national and regional awards. These awards are being increasingly used by organisations as part of the business improvement process and strategic benchmarking. This paper reviews the concepts and approaches of performance measurement (PM) and discusses the integration of PM with the TQM and BE philosophies. A TQM-BE-PM framework with a set of self-assessment checklists was developed. In order to complement the literature base with empirical evidence, an industry survey was conducted and a trial implementation of the framework was carried out in a leading manufacturing firm in Hong Kong. The self-assessment performance data of the fm was evaluated and then benchmarked with the industry averages obtained from the survey. This paper presents the empirical findings and discusses the applicability of the framework in measuring and benchmarking organisational performance toward continual improvement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996),The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
  2. Buxton, C. and Ward, R. (1998), 'From inspiration to performance: an assessment of what organisations are doing to inspire people through performance measurement', The AS$\varrho$'s 5 2nd Annual $\varrho$uality Congress Proceedings, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May, pp.11-18
  3. Pun, K.F., 'Development of an integrated TQM and performance measurement system for self assessment: a method', Total $\varrho$uality Management Journal,Vol. 13, No.6, 2002, pp.759-777 https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412022000010127
  4. Neely, A., Gregory, M. and Platts, K. (1995), 'Measuring performance system design: a literature review and research agenda', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.15, No .4, pp.80-116 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
  5. Schneier, C.E., Shaw, D.G. and Beatty, R.W. (1995), 'Performance measurement and management: a tool for strategy execution', In Shaw, D.G., Schneier, C.E., Beatty, R.W. and Baird, L.S. (eds), Performance Measurement, Management and Appraisal Sourcebook, Human Resources Development Press, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp.3-19
  6. Austin, R.D. (1996), Measuring and Managing Performance in Organisations, Dorset Publishing, New York
  7. Feurer, R and Chaharbaghi, K. (1995),'Performance measurement in strategic change', Benchmarking for $\varrho$uality Management and Technology, Vol.2,No.2, pp.64-83 https://doi.org/10.1108/14635779510090472
  8. Kermally, S. (1997), Managing Performance in Brief, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford
  9. Carrie, A.S. and MacIntosh, R. (1992), 'UK research in manufacturing systems integration', in Pels, H.J. and Worthman, J.C. (eds), Integration in Production Management Systems, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.323-326
  10. De Toni, A and Tonchia, S. (1996),'Lean organisation, management-by-process and performance measurement', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.16, No.2, pp.221-236 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610109947
  11. Geanuracos, J. and Meiklejohn, I. (1993), Performance Measurement: The New Agenda, Business Intelligence,London
  12. Kanji, G.K. (2002) An integrated approach of organisational excellence, http://www.gopal-kanji.com(October)
  13. Eccles, R. and Pybum, P.J. (1992),'Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance' Management Accounting, October, pp.41-4
  14. Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S. and McDevitt, L. (1997), 'Integrated performance mea-surement systems: a development guide', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.17, No.5, pp.522-534 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710167230
  15. Neely, A. and Bourne, M. (2000), 'Why measurement initiatives fail', Measurine Business Excellence, Vol.4, No.4, pp.3-6 https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040010362283
  16. Lynch, R.L. and Cross, K.F. (1991),Measure Up: The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance, London, Mandarin
  17. Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J. and Vollmann, T.E. (1990), The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for Worldclass Competition, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL
  18. Maskel, B.H. (1992), Performance Measurement for Wortd Class Manu facturing: A Model for American Companies, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA
  19. Neely, A. Richards, H, Mills, J., Platts, K. and Bourne, M.(1997), 'Designing performance measures: a structured approach', International Joumal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.17, No.11, pp.1131-1152 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710177888
  20. Kanji, G.K. (1998), 'Measurement of business excellence', Total Quality Management, Vol.9, pp.633-643 https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988325
  21. Kanji, G.K. and Moura e Sa, P. (2002), 'Kanji`s Business Scorecard', Total Quality Management, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 13-27 https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120120098537
  22. Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S., McDevitt, L. and Turner, T. (1998), 'Integrated performance measurement systems: a reference model' in Schonsleben, 0. and Buchel, A. (eds), Organising the Extended Enterprise, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 191-203
  23. EFQM (2002), The European Quality Award, http://www.EFQM.org/ (October)
  24. NIST (2002), Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, http://www.nist.gov/(October)
  25. Waggoner, D.B., Neely, A.D. and Kennerley, M.P. (1999), 'The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: an interdisciplinary review', International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.60, No.61, pp.53-60
  26. Bititci, U.S., Turner, T. and Begemann, C. (2000), 'Dynamics of performance measurement systems', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.20, No.6, pp.692-704 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010321676
  27. Medori, D. and Steeple, D. (2000), 'Aframework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems', International Jurnal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.20, No.5, pp.520-533 https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010318896
  28. Dale, B.G. (1999), Managing Quality, 3rd edition, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
  29. Powell, T.C. (1995), 'Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study', Strategic Management Journal, Vol.13, No.2,pp.119-134
  30. Whitney, G. and Pavett, C. (1998), 'Total quality management as an organisational change: Predictors of successful implementation', Quality Management Journal, Vol.5, No-4, pp.9-22 https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1998.11919164
  31. Van Schalkwyk, J.C. (1998), 'Total quality management and the performancemeasurement barrier', The TQM Magazine, Vol.10, No.2, pp. 124-131 https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810211434
  32. Shin, D., Kalinowski, J.K. and EI-Enein, G.A. (1998), 'Critical implementation issues in total quality management', SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol.63, No.1, pp.10-14
  33. Wang, C.L. and Ahmed, P.K. (2001), 'Energising the organisation: a new agenda for business excellence', Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.5, No.4, pp.22-27 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006516
  34. Adrbsnjo, D. (2001), 'TQM and business excellence: is there really a conflict?' Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.5, No.3, pp.37-40 https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040110403961
  35. Hakes, C. (1997), The Corporate Self-Assessment Handbook, Bristol Quality Centre, Bristol
  36. Pun, K.F., Chin, K.S. and Lau, H. (1999), 'A self assessed quality manage-ment system based on integration of MBNQA/ISO 9000/IS0 14000', International Journal of Quality and Reliabitity Management, Vol.16, No.6, pp.606-629 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719910268206
  37. Lengyel, C. (2000), 'Integration of the balanced scorecard system', Proceedings of the 4th EOQ Congress, Budapest, Vol.1, pp.40-48
  38. Zink, K.J. and Schmidt, A. (1998),'Practice and implementation of self assessment', International Journal of Quality, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 147-170 Beyond Total Quatity Management: Towards the Emerging Paradigm, McGraw Hill, New York https://doi.org/10.1108/13598539810211969
  39. Hillman, G.P. (1994), 'Making self assessment successful', The TQM Magazine, Vol.6, No.3, pp.39-31 https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789410057881
  40. Karapetrovic, S. and Willborn, S. (2001), 'Audit and self assessment in quality management: comparison and compatibili-ty', Managerial Auditing Journal. Vol.16,No.6, pp.366-377 https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900110395505
  41. Shergold, K. and Reed, D.M. (1996), 'Striving for excellence: How self assessment using the Business Excellence Model can result in step improvements in all areas of business activities', The TQM Magazine, Vol.8, No.6, pp.48-52 https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789610152937
  42. Van der Wiele, T. and Brown, A. (1999), 'Self assessment practices in Europe and Australia', International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol.16, No.3, pp.238-251 https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719910223737
  43. Henderson, S. (1997), 'Black swans don't fly double loops: the limits of the learning organisation?' The Learnine Organisation, Vol.5, No.3, pp.99-105
  44. Ho, K.K.Y and Sun, H. (2002),'Developing a quality self-assessment framework based on MBNQA: a case study in Hong Kong', Proceedings of 2002 Hawaii International Conference on Business, Hawaii, June (CD-ROM edition), pp. 1-6