Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DENTIN PERMEABILITY CHANCE ACCORDING TO THE PROCESS OF COMPOMER RESTORATION

컴포머 충전과정에 따른 상아질 투과도의 변화

  • Cho, Hye-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Dral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Ha (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Dral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Se-Joon (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Dral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Dral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 조혜진 (전북대학교 의과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이경하 (전북대학교 의과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이세준 (전북대학교 의과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 의과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2002.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Compomer is composed of matrix and filler : matrix is made of the combination of resins and polycarboxylic molecules that are light-cured, and a filler is a glass component which is capable of ion-release. The resin content of compomers produces polymerization shrinkage which can adversely affect marginal adaptation. Pretreatment is a fundamental step which is treated with conditioner or primer in the use of these materials. Microleakage of restorative materials has been investigated mostly by dye penetration method. Dye penetration method was not quantitative and not measured repeatedly. Fluid filtration method, introduced and developed by Pashley's group, has been extensively used for 20 years for research purpose to understand the physiology of dentin, as well as the effects of various restorative treatments on dentin permeability. It permits quantitative, nondestructive measurment of microleakage in a longitudinal manner. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change of dentin permeability according to the process of compomer restoration. In this study. Cl V cavities were prepared on buccal surface of thirty extracted human molars. The prepared cavities were etched by 37% phosphoric acid. The experimental teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Each group was treated with following materials Group 1 : Prime & Bond NT/Dyract AP, Group2： Single Bond/F2000 compomer, Group 3 : Syntac Single Component/Compoglass. The bonding agent and compomer were applied for each group following manufacturers information. Dentin permeability of each group was measured at each process by fluid filtration method; Step 1 : preparation(smear layer). Step 2 : etching(smear layer removal), Step 3 : applying the bonding agent, Step 4 : filling the compomer. Dentin permeability was expressed by hydraulic conductance ($\mu\textrm{l}$ min$^{-1}$cm$H_2O$$^{-1}$). The data were analysed statistically using One-way ANOVA and Sheffe's method. The results were as follows : 1. Dentin permeability differences between each process were significant except between step 1 and step 2(p<0.01). 2. Dentin permeability after removal of smear layer was highly increased(p<0.01). 3. In most case, decrease of dentin permeability was obtained by applying bonding agent(p<0.01). 4. Dentin permeability differences among the experimental groups were not significant(p>0.05). 5. None of compomers used in this study showed perfect seal at the interface.

Keywords

References

  1. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994:25:587-9
  2. Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin cornposite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996:9: 195-8
  3. Abdalla Al. Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997:10:18-20
  4. Kakabura A. Eliades G. Palahias G. Evaluation of the extent of the acid-base reaction on Dyract restorative material. (Abstract 9). J Dent Res 1996:75:1218
  5. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vangerle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997:76:883-94 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760041001
  6. Triana R. Prado C, Garro J, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994:7:252-4
  7. Ferrari M, Vichi A. Mannocci. Davidson CL. Sealing ability of two 'compomers' applied with and without phosphoric acid treatment for Class V restorations in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:131-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70205-7
  8. Martin J Tyas. Clinical Evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998:23:77-80
  9. Brackett WW,Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick, Browning GD. Microleakage of Class V compo mer and light-curing glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:261-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70234-3
  10. Toledano M. Osorio E. Osorio R, Garcia- Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999:81 :610-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70217-9
  11. Attin T, Buchalla W. Kielbassa AM, Helwig E. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of rein-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995: 11:359-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80035-2
  12. Kidd EA. Microleakage. a review. J Dent 1976:4:199-206 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(76)90048-8
  13. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:446-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90173-3
  14. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990:69:36-9
  15. Outhwaite WC, Livingston MJ, Pashley DH. Effects of changes in surface area, thickness, temperature and post-extraction time on human dentine permeability. Arch Oral Biol 1976:21:599-603 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(76)90029-7
  16. Derkson GD. Pashley DH. Derkson ME. Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: A new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:435-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90384-7
  17. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. part 1. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J 1993:26:37-43 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00540.x
  18. Pommel L, Camps J. Effects of Pressure and Measurement time on the fluid filtration method in endodontics. J Endod 2001:27:256-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00003
  19. Otsuki M. Histological study on pulpal response to restorative composite resins and their ingredients. J Stomatol Soc Jpn 1988:55:203 https://doi.org/10.5357/koubyou.55.203
  20. Ciucchi B, Bouillaquet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth. in vivo. J Endod 1995:21:191-194 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80564-9
  21. Kugel G, Ronald D. Perry, Elizabeth Hoang, Ferrari M. Dyract comporner: Comparison of total etch vs. no etch technique. Gener Dent 1998: :604-6
  22. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent 1999:12:77-83
  23. Hansen SE, Edward J. Swift Jr., Krell KV. Permeability effects of two dentin adhesive systems. J Esthet Dent 1992:4:169-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00689.x
  24. 유현미, 박동성, 오태석, 5급 와동의 수복에 있어서 수종의 컴포머의 미세누출에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지, 2000:25:41-5
  25. 장현주, 이희주, 허복. 쐐기 형태의 5급 와동에서 수복재료에 따른 변연 미세누출의 비교. 대한치과보존학회지 2000:25:56-62
  26. Bourke AM, Walls AWG, McCabe JF, Light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements: The setting reaction. J Dent 1992:20:115-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90118-V
  27. Darbyshire PA, Messer LB, Douglas WHo Microleakage in Class ncomposite restorations bonded to using thermal and load cycling, J Dent Res 1988:67:585-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670031201
  28. Litkowski KJ. McDonald NJ, Swierczewski MA. A comparison of thermo cycling methods for evaluating microleakage. J Dent Res 1989:68:Abstract 208
  29. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences, J Prosthet Dent 2000:83: 194-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80012-8

Cited by

  1. Analysis of temperature rise on the surface of buchanan plugger using thermocouple vol.28, pp.4, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.334
  2. Analysis of temperature rise on the root surface during continuous wave of condensation technique vol.28, pp.4, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.4.341
  3. Effect of different air-drying time on the microleakage of single-step self-etch adhesives vol.38, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.2.73