Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

Theoretical Benefits and Research Findings Underlying the Use of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory in Science Teaching

  • Published : 2002.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Theoretical benefits and research findings on the use of Microcomputer-based Laboratory (MBL) are considered for using MBL in a way that will be of benefit to students and teachers, and discussed as a whole for further synthesis, including the formulation of a research agenda for future consensus-based action. Based on the findings obtained from a comprehensive review of the literature, using a systematic approach, the uses of MBL were compared and contrasted for advancing understanding of the teaching and learning processes in science and mathematics. A number of benefits were proposed by MBL developers but not investigated by educational researchers. A few research studies considered the following practical aspects raised by classroom science teachers: technical problems of MBL equipment; inaccuracy or incompleteness of presentation; efficient ways for handling class time with MBL instruction; and development of MBL curriculum materials for their own instruction. This lack of research related to the use of MBL in science classrooms resulted in educational research that was neither respected nor utilized by science teachers. Setting a research agenda based on the theoretical benefits and research findings is necessary for the effective use of MBL in science classrooms can help to maximize the prospects for successful school improvement projects while minimizing the innovation-related frustrations of individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, D. D.(1988). Effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graphing skills and attitude towards laboratory work by tenth grade biology students of differing tevels of cognitive development, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). Dissertation Abstracts International, (0077)
  2. Albergotti, C.(1994). Real-World Physics: A Portable MBL for Field Measurements. Physics Teacher, 32(4), 206-09 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343970
  3. Alessi, S. M. & Pena, C. M.(1999). Promoting a Qualitative Understanding of Physics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(4), 439-57
  4. Barclay, W. L.(1986). Graphing misconceptions and possibte remedies using microcomputer- based labs. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference (7th, San Diego, CA, June 4-6, 1986). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED264129)
  5. Barrow, W. H(1991). The effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on achievement and attitude toward physical science of preservice middle school teachers, (Doctoral dissertation, University Of Georgia). Dissertation Abstracts International, (0077)
  6. Berg, C. A. & Smith, P.(1994). Assessing Students' Abilities to Construct and Interpret Line Graphs: Disparities between Multiple-Choice and Free-Response Instruments. Science Education, 78(6), 527-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780602
  7. Berger, D.(1987). Learning more than facts: Microcomputer simulations in the science classroom. In D. Peterson (Ed.), Intelligent Schoolhouse: Readings on Computers and Learning. Reston: Reston, VA, 136-140
  8. Brasell, H. M.(1987). The effect of real time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385-395 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240409
  9. Chiu, M. H.(1990). The effectiveness of microcomputer-based laboratories in teaching scientific skills and concepts: A comparative study (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University). Dissertation Abstracts International, (0084)
  10. Clement, J., Molo-os J. R., & Schultz, K.(1986). Adotescents's graphing skills: A descriptive analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA; April 1986
  11. Durick, M.(2001). The Study of Chemistry by Guided Inquiry Method Using Microcomputer- based Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 574-75 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p574
  12. Heck, R. H.(1990). Secondary science teachers' attitudes about microcomputer-based laboratory techniques: Instructional uses and needed improvements. Computers in the Schools, 7(3), 71- 85 https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v07n03_07
  13. Hart. F.(2000). Computer-Based Experiments to Measure RC. Physics Teacher, 38(3), 176-77 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880495
  14. Kreuger, A. & Rawls, G.(1998). Connecting Points: Teacher Decision-Making about Student Data-Collection Technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(3), 279-83 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021800725768
  15. Laws, P. W. & Thornton, R. K.(1993). FIPSE Interactive Physics Project (October 1989-August 1993). Final Report. (ED461492)
  16. Lehman, J. D., & Campbell, J. P.(1991). Microcomputer-based laboratories and computer networking high school science classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (take Geneva, WI, April 1 7-10, 1991).(ED338492)
  17. Linn, M. C., Layman, J. W., & Nachmias, R.(1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer- based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 244-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80029-2
  18. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B.(1988). Curriculum reformulation: Incorporating technoIogy into science instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 1988).(ED303352)
  19. Lorson, M. V.(1991). A comparison of microcomputer-based laboratories and traditional laboratory methods in the high school chemistry laboratory (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1991) Dissertation Abstracts Intetnational, (0168)
  20. Maclsaac, D.(1995). Curricular Reformation in Undergraduate Physics Laboratories Via Action Research. (ED390673)
  21. McKenzie, D. L., & Shaw, E. L.(1986). An examination of the line graphing ability of students in grades seven through twelve. School Science and Mathematics, 86(1), 20-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1986.tb11581.x
  22. Mokros, J. R.(1985). The impact of mirocomputer-based science Iabs on chitdren's graphing skills. Technical Education Research Center, Cambridge, Mass, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC: TERC-TR-85-3 ; Paper submitted to the 1986 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ED264128)
  23. Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F.(1987). The Impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 369-383 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240408
  24. Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. C.(1988). Evaluations of science laboratory data: The role of computer-presented information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 491-506 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240509
  25. Nakhkeh, M. B.(1994). A Review of Microcomputer-Based Labs: How Have They Affected Science Learning? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13(4), 368-81
  26. Nakhleh, M. B. & Krajcik, J. S.(1994). Influence on Levels of Information as Presented by Different Technologies on Students' Understanding of Acid, Base, and pH Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077-96 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660311004
  27. Nichols, J. A.(1992). The use of graphing technology to promote transfer of learning: The interpretation of graphs in physics, (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, (0168)
  28. Preyer, N. W.(1996). The Coupled Harmonic Oscillator: Not Just for Seniors Anymore. Physics Teacher, 34(1), 52-55 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344340
  29. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M. & Steinberg, R. N.(2000). On the Effectiveness of Active-Engagement Microcomputer-Based Laboratories. (ED438183)
  30. Russell, D., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J.(1999). Microprocessor Based Laboratory Activities as Catalysts for Student Construction of Understanding in Physics. (ED453067)
  31. Settlage, J, Jr.(1995). Children's Conceptions of Light in the Context of a Technology Based Curriculum. Science Education, 79(5), 535-53 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790505
  32. Sneider, C.(1987). The MBL project. Classroom Computer Learning, 8(3), 22-24
  33. Stuessy, C. L., & Rowland, P. M.(1989). Advantages of micro-based labs: electronic data acquisition, computerized graphing, or both?, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 8(3), 18-21
  34. Svec, M. T. & Others.(1995). Changes in Preservice Elementary Teachers Physics Course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(2), 79-88 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614594
  35. Tabachnick, B. R., Popkewitz, T. S., & Zeichner, K. M.(1980). Teacher education and the professional perspectives of student teachers. Interchange, 10(4), 12-29 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01810816
  36. Thornton, R. K.(1987). Tools for scientific thinking: microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching. Physics Education, 22(4), 230-38.(ED264130) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/22/4/005
  37. Tinker, R. F.(1987). Educational technology and the future of science education. School Science and Mathematics, 87,466-476 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1987.tb11734.x
  38. Tinker, R. F.(1992). Science for children: The promise of technology. In K. Sheingold, S. M. Malcom, & L. G. Roberts (Eds.), Technotogy for teaching and teaming: Papers form the 7997 AAAS Forum for School Science. AAAS: Washington, DC, 11-30
  39. Trumper, R. & Gelbman, M.(2000). Investigating Electromagnetic Induction through a Microcomputer-Based Laboratory. Physics Education, 35(2), 90-95 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/2/302
  40. Trumper, R. & Gelbman, M.(2001). A Microcomputer-based Contribution to Scientific and Technological Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(3), 213-21 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016673931746
  41. Turkle, S.(1984). The second setf: Computers and the human sprit. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
  42. Wiser, M. & Kipman, D.(1988). The differentiation of heat and temperature: An evaluation of the effect of microcomputer models on students' misconceptions. Educational Technology Center, Cambridge, MA. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 5-9, 1988).(ED303367)
  43. Wiske, M. S., Niguidula, D., & Shepard, J. W.(1988). Collaborative research goes to schooI: Guided inquiry with computers in classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Educational Technology Center. (ED303364)
  44. Woerner, J. J., Rivers, R. H., & Vockell, E. L.(1991). The computer in the science curriculum. Watsonville, CA: McGraw-Hill
  45. Zuman, J. P., & Weinberg, A.(1988). Special needs students having fun learning about response time with MBL, Hands On!, Winter 1988