Case Studies of Preservice Teachers' Conceptual Ecologies

  • Published : 2002.12.30

Abstract

This qualitative study investigated two preservice teachers' conceptual ecologies in professional development during the science teacher preparation program. The notion of a conceptual ecology contains nature of knowledge, science and science teaching, learning, and content knowledge and comfort level. The data were collected during the participants' preservice year and their practicum experience. Both data collections and analyzing were from the various sources of interviews, teaching observations, journals, and information and profiles by the participants' supervisor. Two preservice teachers serve as cases representative of this study. Results show that problems preventing the preservice teachers from moving closer to conceptual change teaching were their understandings of the nature of science and the nature of knowledge. The preservice teachers' views about knowledge come from, and what knowledge is, are largely shaped by the nature of science and learning drive pedagogy and classroom practice. Knowledge of and comfort with the subject matter are also important.

Keywords

References

  1. Driver, R. & Erickson, G.(1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559904
  2. Driver, R., Guesnes, E., & Tiberghien, A.(1985). Children's ideas in science. Open University Press: Philadelphia
  3. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W.(1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560050
  4. Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R.(1998). Teaching for conceptual change, In K G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser(Eds-), fntemationat Handbook of Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 199-218
  5. Hewson, P.W. & Hennessey, M. G.(1991). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change, In Duit, R., Goldberg, F., & Niedderer, H. (Eds.), Research in Physics beaming: Theoreticat Issues and Empiricat Studies. IPN: Kiel, Germany
  6. Kwak, Y.(2001). Case study: A preservice teacher's belief changes represented as constructive profile, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21 (5), 795- 821
  7. Latour, B.(1987). Science in Action; How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press: Cambridge
  8. Novak, L(1987). Proceedings of the second internal seminar: Misconceptions in science and mathematics, Vol. I-III. Comell University, Ithaca, NY
  9. Osborne, R. J. & Freyberg, P.(1985). Learning in science: The implication of children's science. Heinemann: Auckland, New Zealand
  10. Park, H.(1995). A study of the components of students' conceptual ecologies, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  11. Pines, A. L., & West, L. H. T.(1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a source-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583-604 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700510
  12. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A.(1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211- 227 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  13. Strike, K. A. & Posner, G. J.(1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change, In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, 147-176
  14. Schwab, J. J.(1964). Structure of disciplines: Meanings Significances, In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Rand McNally: Chicago
  15. Vosniadou, S. & loannides, C.(1998). From conceptual development to science education: a psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1213-1230 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201004