한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.93-101
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

과학 개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과

The Effect of Cooperative Small Group Discussion in Science Concept Learning

  • 발행 : 2002.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 학생간의 활발한 언어적 상호작용을 촉진하기 위해, 협동적 환경에서 실시한 과학 개념 학습을 위한 소집단 토론이 분자 수준에서의 개념 이해, 적용력, 학생간의 협상에 대한 인식, 의사소통 불안에 미치는 효과를 조사하였다. 남녀 공학 중학교 1학년 두 학급을 통제 집단과 처치 집단으로 선정하고, '물질의 세 가지 상태'와 '분자 운동' 단원에 대하여 총 7차시 동안 학급별로 전통적 수업과 협동적토론 수업을 실시하였다. 이원 공변량 분석 결과, 처치 집단의 분자 수준에서의 개념 점수가 통제 집단에 비하여 유의미하게 높았으며, 특히 사전 성취 수준하위 학생들의 향상이 두드러졌다. 그러나 적용력 검사에서는 두 집단 간의 차이가 유의미하지 않았다. 학생간의 협상에 대한 인식은 처치 집단이 보다 긍정적이었지만, 의사소통 불안은 두 집단 간에 차이가 없었다.

This study investigated the effect of small group discussion for science concept learning in cooperative learning environments that encourage verbal interaction with peers upon students' understanding of the concepts at the particulate level, application abilities, perceptions of students' negotiation, and communication apprehension. Two classes of 7th grade at a coed middle school were assigned to the control and the treatment groups. They were taught about change of states and motion of molecules for 7 class periods. Two-way ANCOVA results revealed that the scores of a conceptions test for the treatment group were significantly higher than those for the control group, and that the low-achievers in the treatment group performed better than those in the control group. However, the scores of two groups did not differ significantly in an application test. The perceptions of students' negotiation for the treatment group were more positive, but the scores of the communication apprehension for two groups were not significantly different.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강석진과 노태희(2000) 토론 과정에서의 사회적 합의 형성을 강조한 개념 학습 전략의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 250-261
  2. 강석진, 김창민, 노태희(2000). 소집단 토론 과정에서의 언어적 상호작용 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(3), 353-363
  3. 강석진, 한수진, 정영선, 노태희(2001). 학습 전략에 따른 소집단 토론에서의 언어적 상호작용 양상 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), 279-288
  4. 교육부(1999). 중학교 교육 과정 해설(III) -수학, 과학, 기술 . 가정-, 서울 대한 교과서 주식회사
  5. 노태희와 김창민(1999). 협동적인 컴퓨터 보조 수업이 중학생들의 과학 학습에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(2), 266-274
  6. 노태희, 강석진, 한수진, 한재영, 전경문, 성을선(인쇄중). 과학 개념 학습을 위한 소집단 토론에서 인지적 역할 부여의 효과. 대한화학회지
  7. Basili, P. A., & Sanford, J, P.(1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293-304 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280403
  8. Bianchini, J. A.(1999). From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science. Science Education, 83(5), 577-601 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<577::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
  9. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A.(1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
  10. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P.(1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  11. Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D.(1990), Teaching and learning through discussion. In W. W. Wilen (Ed.). Teaching and learning through discussion: The theory, research and practice of the discussion method (25-44). Illinois: Charles C Thomas
  12. Haidar, A. H., & Abraham, M. R.(1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938
  13. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.(1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization (2nd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall
  14. Lenning, R. A.(1993). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th grade general science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1087-1101 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300907
  15. Lumpe, A. T. & Staver, J. R.(1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71-98 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108
  16. McCroskey, J. C., Beatty, M. J., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G.(1985). The content validity of the PRCA-24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly, 33(3), 165-173 https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369595
  17. Moshman, D., & Geil, M.(1998). Collaborative Reasoning: Evidence for Collective Rationality. Thinking and Reasoning, 4(3), 231-248 https://doi.org/10.1080/135467898394148
  18. Richmond, G.. & Striley, J.(1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
  19. Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A.(1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 503-534 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300508
  20. Sandberg, K. E.(1995). Affective and cognitive features of collaborative learning. In G. Kierstons (Ed.). Review of Research and Development Education. 6(4). NC: Appalachian state university
  21. Taylor, T., Dawson, V., & Frazer, B. J.(1995). Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Fransisco, CA.