The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Effects of drilling process in stability of micro-implants used for the orthodontic anchorage

고정원을 위한 micro-implant 매식시 drilling 유무에 따른 안정성에 관한 연구

  • Chang, Young-Il (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wan (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 장영일 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김종완 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2002.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate experimentally the mechanical and histological effect of drilling process on the stability of micro-implant used for the orthodontic anchorage. For this purpose, 32 micro-implants(Osas$^{(R)}$, Epoch medical, ${\phi}$1.6 mm) were inserted into maxilla, mandible and palate in two beagle dogs. 16 micro-implants(8 per dog) were inserted after drilling with pilot drilling bur (drill method group). 16 micro-implants(8 per dog) were inserted without drilling (drill-free method group). After 1 week, micro-implants were loaded by means of Ni-Ti coil spring (Ni-Ti springs-extension$^{(R)}$, Ormco) with 200-300 gm force. Following 12 weeks, the micro-implants and the surrounding bone were removed. Before sacrifice, the mobilities were tested with Periotest$^{(R)}$(Siemens). Undecalcified serial sections with the long axis were made and the histologic evaluations were done. The results of this study were as follow ; 1. The osseointegration was found in both of drill-free method group and drill method group 2. Two of drill method group and one of drill-free method group in 32 micro-implants were lost after loading. 3. The mobilities of drill-free method group were less than drill method group 4. The bone contact on surface of micro-implants in drill-free method group was more than drill method group but there was no significant difference between groups. 5. The bone density in threads of micro-implants in drill-free method group was more than drill method group and there was significant difference between groups. These results suggest that drill-free method in insertion of micro-implants is superior to drill method on the stabilities, bone remodeling and osseointegrations under early loading.

본 연구는 교정적 고정원을 얻기 위하여 micro-implant(Osas$^{(R)}$, Epoch medical)를 drill method와 drill-free method로 매식시, 조기 교정력에 대한 각각의 경우 micro-implant의 역학적 안정성 및 조직학적 생체 적합도의 차이를 알아보고자 시행하였다. 두 마리의 실험견(beagle dog)을 대상으로 상, 하악 협측과 구개부위에 좌우측을 구분하여 drill method 군과drill-free method 군으로 나누어 매식하였다. 매식 한 재료는 직경 1.6 mm의 micro-implant를 사용하였으며, drill method 군 16개, drill-free method 군 16개, 총32개의 micro-implant를 식립하였다. 교정력은 매식 후 1주 뒤에 Ni-Ti coil spring(Ni-Ti springs-extension$^{(R)}$, Ormco)으로 200 gm - 300 gm의 힘을 적용하였다. 동요도 검사는 희생 전에 Periotest$^{(R)}$(Siemens)로 측정하였다. 매식 12주 후에 관류고정 하였으며 시편은 레진 포매하여 Exakt system$^{(R)}$(Exakt)을 이용하여 비탈회 표본을 제작하였다. 표본은 H-E 염색한 뒤, 광학 현미경 상에서 검경하여 조직학적 소견을 분석하였고 조직계측학적 측정은 골접촉률과 골밀도로 분석하였다. 위와 같은 실험을 통하여 매식한 micro-implant의 탈락률과 동요도, 골접촉률 및 골밀도로 drill method 군과 drill-free method 군의 역학적 안정성 및 조직학적 생체 적합도를 비교, 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. micro-implant와 골의 계면은 기계적 접촉 뿐만 아니라 골유착도 있었다. 2. micro-implant의 탈락은 drill method 군이 더 높았다. 3. 동요도는 drill method 군이 전반적으로 더 컸다. 4. micro-implant와 골접촉 정도는 전반적으로 drill-free method 군에서 양호했다. 5. micro-implant 나사산 사이 내에 존재하는 골밀도는 전반적으로 drill-free method 군에서 더 높았다. 결론적으로, micro-implant는 매식시 drill-free method가 drill method보다 탈락률과 동요도 및 골접촉률과, 골밀도에서 더 우수한 결과를 보여 drilling 과정이 안정성과 골조직 치유 및 골유착에 영향을 미친다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983 : 50 : 255-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90027-6
  2. Umemori M, Sugawara J, Mitani H, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H. Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 115 : 166-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70345-8
  3. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997 : 31 : 763-7
  4. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: A preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1998 : 13 : 201-9
  5. Goodman S, Wang JS, Doshi A, Aspenberg P. Difference in bone ingrowth after one versus two daily episodes of micromotion : experiments with titanium chambers in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1993 : 27 : 1419-24 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820271109
  6. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000 : 3 : 23-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.030105.x
  7. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  8. Lindstrom J, Branemark PI, Albrektsson T. mandibular reconstruction using the preformed autologous bone graft. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981 : 15 : 29-38 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318109103408
  9. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987 : 57 : 597-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  10. Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Light and transmission electron microscopy used to study the tissue morphology close to implants. Biomaterials 1985 : 6 : 421-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(85)90104-8
  11. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Welsh RP, Binnington AG. Radiographic and morphologic studies of load-bearing porous surfaced structural implants. Clin Orthop 1981 : 156 : 249-57
  12. Babbush CA. Endosseous blade-vent implants: A research review. J Oral Surg 1972 : 30 : 168-75
  13. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Threaded versus poroussurfaced design for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986 : 20 : 1309-33 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200907
  14. Weiss CM. A comparative analysis of fibre-osteal and osteal integration and other variables that affect long term bone maintenance around dental implants J Oral Irnplantol 1987 : 13 : 467-87
  15. Meffert RM., Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implant: a review. J Periodontol 1992 : 63 : 859-70 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  16. Newman MG, Flemrnig TF. Periodontal considerations of implants and implant-associated microbiota. J Dent Educ 1988 : 52 : 737-44
  17. 박효상. micro-implant 를 이용한 교정치료. 나래출판사 2001: 45-6
  18. van Steenberghe D, Tricio J, Naert I, Nys M. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995 : 6 : 31-9
  19. 김종완, 장영일. 교정적 고정원으로 이용되는 drill-free micro-implant에 대한 조직학적 연구. 서울대학교대학원 석사논문. 2002
  20. Drago CJ, A prospective study to assess osseointegration of dental endosseous implants with the Periotest instrument. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 : 15 : 389-95
  21. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellstrorn A. Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 : 6 : 442-7
  22. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  23. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  24. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  25. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  26. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  27. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  28. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  29. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  30. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  31. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  32. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  33. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  34. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  35. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  36. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  37. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  38. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  39. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  40. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7
  41. Bahr W. Pretapped and self-tapping screws in the human midface : torque measurements and bone screw interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 : 19 : 51-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80569-7