Change Detection Using Image Differencing Method in Pyeongtaeg City

화상간(畵像間) 차이법(差異法)을 활용한 평택시 지역 지표면(地表面) 변화탐지(變化探知)

  • Received : 2002.05.29
  • Accepted : 2002.06.25
  • Published : 2002.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and seek the best suitable band and threshold boundary level on the change detection of image differencing method using Landsat TM data(20 May 1987 and 20 May 1993) in Pyeongtaeg City. The change detection images differencing method were evaluated by using normal reference data with an optimal threshold level{$mean{\pm}(SD{\times}T$ value). The normal reference data consisted of positive change{change dark into light in image pattern, that is, it changed arable land(paddy, upland, forest and so on) to artificial area(buildings, vinyl-house and roads, etc)} and negative change(change light into dark in image pattern, that is, it changed artificial area into arable land). As the result, the kappa coefficients of visible bands(D1, D2 and D3) were higher than those of infrared bands(D4, D5 and D7), and than D1 image with 1.0 thresholding and normal reference data was a improved result in the land-surface change detection such as kappa coefficient : 68.4%, overall accuracy : 89.2%, negative change : 6.6%, positive change : 10.6%.

급변하는 농업환경을 신속히 파악하고 이에 대처한다는 것은 중요한 일이다. 특히 농경지의 이용형태가 다양화(多樣化)되고 고도화(高度化)됨에 따라 그 필요성이 한층 인정된다. 이에 부응하는 인공위성자료인 Landsat TM을 이용한 우리 나라에 가장 알맞은 지표면 변동탐지 방법에 대한 연구 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 우리 나라에 알맞은 지표면의 변화탐지기법을 찾기 위해 화상간 차이법을 적용하였으며, 동시에 변화탐지도에 대한 평가를 위해 참조자료를 작성한 후 최적 임계값을 구하였다. 여기서 정상적인 참조자료(농경지가 인공물로 변한 경우는 양의 변화, 그 반대면 음의 변화)나 비정상적인 참조자료(인공물이 농경지로 변한 경우는 양의 변화, 그 반대면 음의 변화)로 평가하였다. 또한 최적 임계값은 '평균${\pm}$(표준편차 ${\times}$ T값)'로 하여 구하였다. 1987년부터 1993년까지 6년 동안 가장 결과가 좋은 화상간 차이법은 D1 화상(1.0)으로 정상적인 참조자료로 평가시 카파계수가 68.4%, 전체 정확도는 89.2%로 나타났다. 또한 전체면적 48,436 ha중 음으로 변화된 영역은 3,207 ha(6.6%), 양으로 변화된 영역은 5,117 ha(10.6%)로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chavez, P. S., Jr. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections-revisited and improved. Photogramm etricengineering & remote sensing 62(9) : 1025-1036
  2. Choung, S. H. 1992. Wetland change detection using landsat-5 thematic mapper data in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Idaho
  3. Cracknell, A. P. and L. W. Hayes. 1993. Atmospheric corrections to passive satellite remote sensing data. Introduction to remote sensing. London. Taylor & Francis : 116-158
  4. Douglas, M. M. and B. N. Haack. 1994. Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation. Photogrammetric engineering & remote sensing 60(10) : 1243-1251
  5. ER Mapper 5.0 Application. 1995. ED Mapper : 47-57
  6. ERDAS Field Guide, 1997, 4th Edition. ERDAS Inc
  7. Fung T. 1989. An assessment of TM imagery for land cover change detection. Pro. of the international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Canadian remote sensing society, Vancouver, Canada. 1998-2001
  8. Janssen, L. L. F. and J. M. van der Wel. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data : A review. Photogrammetric engineering & remote sensing 60(4) : 419-426
  9. Jensen, J. R. 1986. Introductory digital image processing : A remote sensing perspective. PretiCe-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey. 379
  10. Kauth, R. J. and G. S. Thomas. 1976. The tasseled cap - a graphic description of the spectral - temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Proceedings of the symposium on machine processing of remotely sensing, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Indiana. 4B : 41-51
  11. Lillesand. T. M. and R. W. Kiefer. 1994. Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley & Sons, New York. 750
  12. National Geography Institute. 1995. Topography map. Pyeongtaeg sheet(Scale 1:50,000)
  13. National Geography Institute. 1996. Topography map. Asan sheet(Sca1e 1:50,000)
  14. National Geography Institute. 1997. Topography map Yonein sheet(Sca1e 1:50,000)
  15. National Geography Institute. 1997. Topography map Namyang sheet (Scale 1:50,000)
  16. Ortiz. M. J., A. R. Formaggio and J. C. N. Epiphanio. 1997. Classification of crop lands through integration of remote sensing. GIS and historical database International journal of remote sensing 18(1) : 95-105 https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697219295
  17. Pathfinder Office Software User Guider, Volume Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ. 1996. Trimble Navigation Limited
  18. Rim, S. K. 2000. A study on change detection of the plowland by using Landsat TM data. Ph. D. Dissertation, Kyunghee Uni. : 96-97
  19. Singh, A. 1989. Review article : digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensing data. International journal of remote sensing 10(6) : 989-1003 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903939
  20. Singh, A. 1986. Change detection in the tropical forest environment of Northeastern India using Landsat. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 237-254
  21. Story, M. and R. G. Congalton. 1986. Accuracy assessment : A user's perspective. Photogrammetric engineering & remote sensing 52(3) : 397-399
  22. Thomas, M. L. and R. W. Kiefer. 1987. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 1-36, 531-606
  23. Weismiller. R. A., S. J. Kristof, D. K. Scholz. P. E. Anuta and S. A. Momin. 1997. Change detection in coastal zone environments. Photogrammetric engineering & remote sensing 43(12) : 1533-1539
  24. Wilkie, D. S. and J. T. Finn. 1996. Remote sensing imagery for natural resources monitoring, Columbia University Press