OPTICAL EFFECTS OF NONMETALLIC POST AND CORE SYSTEMS ON ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS

비금속 포스트 코어가 전부도재관에 미치는 광학적인 영향

  • Kim Sung-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim Ju-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim Heon-Song (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 김성원 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 임주환 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 임헌송 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2002.10.01

Abstract

Recently as the esthetic concerns about dental prosthesis have been increased, the nonmetallic post and core systems have been introduced clinically to improve the color and the low optical transmittance of conventional casting metal post and core systems. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the optical transmittance and the shade changes of all-ceramic crowns with two nonmetallic post and core systems. The experimental groups were classified as follows : Total 27 specimens(9 samples in each group) were evaluated. Group I : Natural teeth as a control group Group II : CosmoPost and $Empress^{(R)}$ core (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) Group III : $LIGHT-POST^{TM}$ and $LIGHT-CORE^{TM}$ (Bisco, U.S.A.) In all group, all-ceramic crowns were fabricated with the same shade of IPS $Empress^{(R)}$ II (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein) after abutment preparation, and then two kinds of spectrophotometers, UV 3101 PC (Shimadzu, Japan) and CM 503i (Minolta Co. Ltd. Japan), were used to measure the optical transmittance and the color value. The following results were obtained : 1. The optical transmittance of each group without all-ceramic crowns, was siginificantly decreased in order of Group III, I and II (p<0.05). 2. The optical transmittance of each group with all-ceramic crowns cemented, were siginificantly decreased in order of Group I, II and III (p<0.05). 3. In comparison with the shade of all-ceramic crowns, there were no significant differences between groups regardless of the cementation. 4. In comparison with the shade changes in each group after the cementation of all-ceramic crowns, there were no significant differences between groups. From the above results, it is thought that the selection among materials used in this study doesn't influence greatly the esthetic restoration, because the differences of optical transmittance were so small that those were clinically insignificant.

Keywords

References

  1. Kakehashi Y, Naef R, Sch rer P. A new all-ceramic post and core system : clinical. technical and in vitro results. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1998: 18:587-93
  2. Koutayas SO. Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores : The state of the art. Quintessence Int 1999: 30: 383-92
  3. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Esthetic consideration in restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:702-5
  4. Yoon JY, Cho IH. A Study on the fracture strength and fracture pattern of Zirconium Post and Carbon fiber post : Department of Prosthodontics Graduate. School. Dankook Univ.: 2001
  5. Yi YJ, Yang JH. Clinical application of carbon fiber post. Clinical Dentistry: 1999:5
  6. Isidor F. Odman p. Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996:9: 131-6
  7. Stegaroiu R, Yamada H, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Retention and failure mode after cyclic loading in two post and core systerns. J Prosthet Dent 1996: 75: 506-11
  8. Miller LL. A scientific approach to shade matching. Quintessence Pub Co: 1988. p. 193-208
  9. Davison SP, Myslinski NR. Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent 1990:63:97-101
  10. Obregon A, Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WE. Effects of opaque and porcelain surface texture on the color of ceramometal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981:46:330-40
  11. Brodbelt RHW, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1980:59:70-5
  12. Brodbelt RHW, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL, Yu R. Translucency of human dental enamel. J Dent Res 1981:53: 1749-53
  13. O'Keefe KL, Pease PL, Herrin HK. Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. J Prosthet Dent 1991 :66:434-8
  14. Goodkind RJ, Keenan KM, Schwabacher WB. A comparison of chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1985:53: 105-9
  15. Jorgenson MW, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relatives to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979:42: 96-105
  16. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between different porcelain system. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:35-40
  17. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989: 68: 1755-9
  18. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II : Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973: 29:556-66
  19. O'Brien WJ. Double layer effect and other optical phenomenon. Dental Clinics of North America 1985:29:667-72
  20. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000:83:412-7
  21. Clark EB. An analysis of tooth color. J Am Dent Assoc 1981: 18:2093-5
  22. Johnston WM. O'Brien WJ. Color analysis of dental modifying porcelains. J Dent Res 1982:61 :484-8
  23. Stefan JP, Paul P, Nicola P, Peter S. Light transmission of composite luting resins. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996: 16: 165-73
  24. Lemire P, Burke B. Color in dentistry. J M Ney Co: 1975
  25. Frank LP, Leno SP. Introduction to Optics. 2nd ed. Pretice-hall International Co Inc: 1966. p. 501-21
  26. Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987:58:535-41
  27. Grajower R, Revah A, Sorin S. Reflectance spectra of natural and acrylic resin teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1976:36:570-9
  28. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Analysis of optical transmission by 400-500nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 1994: 22: 112-7
  29. Strang R, McCrosson J, Muirhead GM, Richardson SA. The setting of visible-light- cured resins beneath etched porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1987:163:149-51
  30. Choi KB, Park CW, Song CY, Ko SM. Analysis of optical transmission characteristics by visible Light into Shade guides. The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics. 2000: 38: 147-59
  31. Houwink B. The index of refraction of dental enamel apatite. Br Dent J 1974: 137:472-5 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4803346
  32. Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991 :22:525-31
  33. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM. Prediction of an esthetics restorative material. J Dent Res 1983 :62: 581-4
  34. Burke B. Dental Porcelain: The state of the Art-1977-Color and Esthetics. Los Angeles: University of Southern California: 1977. p. 293-5
  35. Eissman H. Dental Porcelain: The state of the Art-1977-Visual Perception and Tooth Contour. Los Angeles: University of Southern California; 1977
  36. Barghi N, Richardson JT. A study of various factors influencing shade of bonded porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1985:39:625-7
  37. Park YH, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on the shade of dental porcelain according to the condensation methods and glazing. The Journal of Korean Academy of Stomatognathic function and occlusim. 1999: 15: 131-40
  38. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-and-core system. J Prosthet Dent 1999:81 :625-9. 388-93