Anesthetic and Cardiopulmonary Effects of Propofol as Infusion and Induction Anesthesia in Dogs

개에서 주사 및 도입마취제로서 Propofol의 마취효과 및 심폐기능에 미치는 영향

  • Yoo, Jun-ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Chung-ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Wan-Hee (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nam, Tchi-chou (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kweon, Oh-kyeong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University)
  • Accepted : 2002.02.28
  • Published : 2002.03.25

Abstract

To investigate the cardiopulmonary and anesthetic effects of propofol in dogs, experimental dogs were randomly divided into 4 groups (propofol infusion anesthesia, P/INF, propofol intermittent anesthesia, P/INTER, propofol induction anesthesia, P/ISO, thiopental Na induction anesthesia, T/ISO) and monitored analgesic and anesthetic effects, recovery time, body temperature, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic pressure. In all groups, apnea was not observed. In the P/INF group, the respiratory rate(RR) was slightly decreased, but in the P/INTER group, RR was increased and shallowing. In the groups of P/ISO and T/ISO, the respiratory rate was decreased. Heart rate(HR) was increased after induction anesthesia in all groups, but gradually decreased. Mean arterial pressure(MAP) was decreased after injection anesthesia in the groups of P/INF and P/INTER. In the groups of P/ISO and T/ISO, however, MAP was slightly increased. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure were gradually decreased after induction anesthesia, but not significantly. In the groups of P/INF and P/ISO, recovery time was shorter than the groups of P/INTER and T/ISO. In all groups, body temperature of animals was decreased gradually according to time but no significant changes were observed. Propofol injection doesn't make the complete loss of responses of animals, especially, in the P/INTER group. In the P/INF group, deep pain was present until the end of anesthetic period. During recovery period, any other side effects except incoordination were not monitored. The present study suggested that infusion anesthesia was superior to intermittent anesthesia as injection anesthetic agent, and propofol was better than thiopental Na as induction anesthetic agent.

Keywords

References

  1. Veber B, Gachot B, Bedos JP, et al. Severe sepsis after intravenous injection of contaminated propofol. Anesthesiology, 80:712, 1994
  2. Sosis MB, Braverman B, Villaflor E. Propofol, but not thiopental, supprots the growth of Candida albicans. Anesth Analg, 81:132-134, 1995
  3. Berry CB, Gillespie T, Hood J, et al. Growth of micro- organisms in solutions of intravenous anesthetic agents. Anesthesia, 48:30-32, 1993
  4. Heldmann E, Bravermann DC, Shofer F. The association of propofol usage with postoperative wound infection rate in clean wounds: a retrospective study.Vet Surg, 28: 256-259, 1999
  5. Bufalari A, Miller SM, Giannoni C, et al. The use of propofol as an induction agent for halothane and isofurane anesthesia in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc,34:84-91, 1998
  6. Smith JA, Gaynor JS, Bednarski RM, et al. Adverse effects of administration of propofol with various preanesthetic regimens in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc,202:1111-1116, 1993
  7. Keegan RD, Greene SA. Cardiovascular effects of a continuous two-hour propofol infusion in dogs comparison with isoflurane anesthesia. Vet Surg, 22:537-543, 1993
  8. Funkquist PME, Nyman GC, Lofgren AJ, et al. Use of propofol-isoflurane as an anesthetic regimen for cesarean section in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 211:313-317, 1997
  9. Robertson SA, Johnston S, Beemsterboer J. Cardiopulmonary, anesthetic, and postanesthetic effects of intravenous infusions of propofol in greyhounds andnon-greyhounds. Am J Vet Res, 53:1027-1032, 1992
  10. Weaver BMQ, Raptopoulos D. Induction of anesthesia in dogs and cats with propofol. Vet Rec, 126:617-620, 1990
  11. Quandt JE, Robinson EP, Rivers WJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory and anesthetic effects of propofol and thiopental in dogs. Am J Vet Res, 59:1137-1143,1998
  12. Biebuyck JF, Phil D. Propofol: a new intravenous anesthetic. Anesthesiology, 71:260-277, 1989
  13. Mandsager RE, Clarke CR, Shawley RV, et al. Effects of chloramphenicol on infusion phamacokinetics of propofol in greyhounds. Am J Vet Res, 56:95-99,1995
  14. Kim JW, Jang IH. The effects of Xylazine premedication on the propofol anesthesia in the dogs. Kor J Vet Clin Med, 16:86-94, 1999
  15. Reid J and Nolan AM. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in dogs premedicated with acepromazine and maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide. J Vet Pham Ther, 16:501-505, 1993
  16. Thomas DV. Propofol supprots bacterial growth. Br J Anesth, 66:274, 1991
  17. Morgan DWT, Legge K. Clinical evaluation of propofol as an intravenous anesthetic agent in avts and dogs. Vet Rec, 124:31-33, 1999
  18. Watkins SB, Hall LK, Clarke KW. Propofol as an intravenous anesthetic agent in dogs. Vet Rec, 120:326-329, 1987
  19. Ilkiw JE. Injectable anesthetics: Other potentially useful new injectable anesthetic agents. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac, 22:281-289, 1992
  20. Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. Injectable anesthetics. In: Veterinary anesthesia, 3rd ed, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore:223, 1996