Journal of the Korean Society of Safety (한국안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Safety (한국안전학회)
권호 표지

Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Steel Bridges on Its Paint System during Safe Life Under

강교의 도장방식에 따른 안전수명간 생애주기비용분석

  • Han, Sang-Chul (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyum (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology) ;
  • Cho, Sun-Kyu (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology)
  • 한상철 (서울산업대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 김은겸 (서울산업대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 조선규 (서울산업대학교 토목공학과)
  • Published : 2002.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Life Cycle Cost analysis technique is introduced to evaluate cost-effectiveness of two paint systems of steel bridges. The systems are a conventional paint system and a galvanized paint system. The all costs during safe lift such as initial cost repainting costs, disposal costs are considered for the lift cycle cost analysis. The NIST model is used and BridgeLCC 1.0 developed by the NST is utilized as the lift cycle cost analysis tool. It is concluded that, in spite of expensive initial cost, the durable paint system may be cost-effective compared with conventional paint system.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부/시설안전기술공단(2000), 국내외 시설물에 대한 유지관리기술의 동향파악 및 기술 발전방향 설정을 위한 연구, 시설안전기술공단 기술보고서 TS-2000-R5-001, pp. 356-363
  2. 김용수, 김훈 (1999), '공공 건설사업 효율화 종합대책에서의 LCC분석,' 시설안전, 1999년 가을호, pp. 48-55
  3. 사단법인 한국강구조학회(1998), 고속철도 강합성교량의 적용성에 관한 연구
  4. 임종권(1999), 구조수명간 최소기대비용에 기초한 교량의 최적내진안전수준의 결정을 위한 신뢰성해석기법, 한양대학교 박사학위 논문
  5. Ang, A. H-S., Frangopol, D., Ciampoli, M., Das, P. C., and Kanda, J.(1997b). 'Summary of Panel Discussion : Life-Cycle Cost Evaluation and Target Reliability for Design,' Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 77-78
  6. Chang, S. E. and Shinozuka, M.(1996). 'Life- Cycle Cost Analysis with Natural Hazard Risk,' Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 118-126 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:3(118)
  7. De Brito, J. And Branco, F. A.(1998). Road Bridges Functional Failure Costs And Benefits,Canadian Journal of Civil Engineehng, Vol. 25, pp. 261-270 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-25-2-261
  8. Ehlen, M. A.(1999), Bridge LCC 1.0 Users Manual -Life-Cycle Costing Software for Ehlen, M. A.(1999), BridgeLCC 1.0 Users Manual -Life-Cycle Costing Software for Priliminary Bridge Design, Office of Applied Economics, Building And Fire Research Laboratory, NIST
  9. Ehlen, M. A. and Marshall, H. E.(1996), The Economics of New-Technology Materials : A Case Study of FRP Bridge Decking, Office of Applied Economics, NIST
  10. Goldbaum, J.(2000), 'Life Cycle Cost Analysis State-Of-The-Practice,' Final Report Cdot-Rl-R-OO-3, Colorado D.O.T
  11. Goodwin, F. E. And Weyers, R.(1999), 'Life- Cycle Cost Analysis for Zinc And Other Protective Coatings for Steel Structures, Trasn- portation Research Record 1680, Trasportation Research Board, pp. 63-73
  12. Jobes, R. A.(1996), 'Evaluation of Unpainted Weathering Steel Bridges In Idaho,' Fhwa- Itd-Rp117, Final Report, Federal Highway Administration
  13. Leeming, M. B.(1993). 'The Application of Lite Cycle Costing to Bridges,' Bridge Management 2, Thomas Telford, London, U.K., pp. 574-583
  14. Nishikawa, K.(1997), 'A Concept of Minimized Maintenance Bridges,矯梁と基礎, 97-8月号, pp. 64-72 (In Japanese)
  15. Piringer, S.(1993), 'Whole-Life Costing of Steel Bridges. Bridge Management 2, Thomas Telford, London, U.K., pp. 584-593
  16. Smith, M. R. And Walls, J.(1998), 'Life-Cycle Cost Analysis In Pavement Design-Interim Techni- cal Bulletin,' Fhwa-Sa-98-079, Research Report, Federal Highway Adminitration