Evaluation of craniofacial growth prediction method on Class III malocclusion patients

골격성 III급 부정교합자의 두개안모 성장예측에 대한 평가

  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Hee (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jung, Mi-Ra (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Sung, Ji-Hyun (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 강은희 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 정미라 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 성지현 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2003.02.01

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate whether growth Prediction method can be used to diagnose and make treatment plan in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients or not. The sample was consisted of 25 patients(13 males, 12 females) who had been diagnosed with skeletal Class III malocclusion at first visit and after that had returned to take ortognathic surgery. Growth prediction performed with Ricketts' growth prediction method from first cephaogram. was compared with actual growth of the second cephalogram. The findings of this study were as follows ; 1. There was significant difference between actual growth and growth prediction in Porion Location, Ramus Position, Facial Depth, Facial Axis, Mandibular Plane angle, Maxillary Convexity. So, for these items Ricketts' growth prediction method is not proper to predict growth. 2. Although the growth amount of mandibular body was similar to normal growth amount, mandible was positioned anteriorly because of Porion Location and Ramus Position. 3. In skeletal Class III malocclusion patients, the tendency of mandibular prognathism might be aggreviated because of anterior placement of ramus and anterosuperior rotation of Pogonion.

본 연구는 성장에 의한 변화를 예측하는 현재의 방법이 실제로 골격성 III급 부정교합자의 진단과 치료계획에 적절히 사용될 수 있는지를 판단해 보기 위해 초진 시 골격성 III급 부정교합으로 진단받고 성장 종료 후 악교정 수술을 받기 위해 재내원한 골격성 III급 부정교합자 25명(남자 13명, 여자 12명)을 대상으로 시행되었다. 초진시 채득된 측모 두부방사선 사진에서 Ricketts의 성장예측법을 통해 성장 종료 후의 상태를 예측한 후, 악교정 수술을 위해 재내원 했을 때 채득된 측모 두부방사선 사진에서 계측된 실제 성장량과 비교분석 함으로써 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 예측치와 관측치의 일치정도를 평가해본 결과 Porion Location, Ramus Position, Facial Depth, Facial Axis, Mandibular Plane angle, Maxillary Convexity에서의 예측치가 관측치와 차이를 보이고 있어 이 항목에 대한 Ricketts 성장예측법의 예측치가 실제 성장량을 잘 설명해주지 못함이 관찰되었다. 2. 하악골체의 성장량은 정상 성 장량과 유사하였으나 Porion Location, Ramus Position이 정상적인 성장과정을 벗어나면서 하악골의 전방위치를 유도하였다. 3. 골격성 III급 부정교합자에서는 성장의 양과 방향이 비정상적인 성장변화를 나타내어 정상 성장에서라면 변화를 보이지 않을 하악지의 전방 위치, 하악이부의 전상방 회전등이 일어나 하악 전돌의 경향이 악화될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Williams S, Andersen CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986 : 89 : 302-11
  2. Nakasima A, Ichinose M. Role of parental variable in predicting facial growth after treatment of anterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986 : 90 : 492-500 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90109-5
  3. Schulhof RJ, A.B, M.A, Nakamura S, Williamson WV. Prediction of abnormal growth in Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1977 : 71 : 421-30
  4. Suzuki A, Takahama Y. Parental data used to predict growth of craniofacial form. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991 : 99 : 107-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70113-B
  5. Campbell PM. The dilemma of Class III treatment. Angle Orthod 1983 : 53 : 175-91
  6. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular Prognathism. Am J Orthod 1974 : 66 : 140-71
  7. Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal pattern of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1955 : 25 : 208-22
  8. Crain SP. The comprehension of diagnostic differentiation of treatment therapeutics. Am J Orthod 1955 : 54 : 604-17
  9. Ellis EE, McNamara JA. Components of adult Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1984 : 42 : 295-305
  10. Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juvenile and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986 : 56 : 7-30
  11. 성재현, 권오원, 김상두. III 급 부정교합 치료 후 예후에 관한 후향적 고찰, 대치교정지 1998 : 28 : 175-87
  12. 김형돈, 유대진, 김일규 등. 8-10세 아동에서 III 급 부정교합의 구성요소에 대한 측모두 부방사선 계측학적 연구, 대치교정지 2000 : 30 : 159-74
  13. 임한호, 윤영주, 김광원. 악교정술을 요하는 골격성 III 급 부정교합자의 악안면 골격 특성 에 관한 연구, 대치교정지 1998 : 28 : 189-201
  14. 성재현. III 급 부정교합의 치료전략, 대치교정지 1996 : 26 : 125-39
  15. Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA. The cranial base as an etiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1968 : 38 : 250-55
  16. Droel R, Isaacson RJ. Some relationships between the glenoid fossa position and various skeletal discrepancies. Am J Orthod 1972 : 61 : 64-78
  17. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus antero-posterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964 : 34 : 75-93
  18. Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth, Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders Company, 1982
  19. 성재현, 권오원, 경희문. 성장기 III 급 부정교합자의 장기관찰, 경북치대논문집 1993 : 10 : 1-20
  20. Mitani H. Prepubertal growth of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1981 : 80 : 546-53
  21. Mitani H, Sato K, Sugawara J. Growth of mandibular prognathism after pubertal growth peak. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1993 : 104 : 330-6
  22. 박영철, 박민성, 김태균. 골격성 III 급 부정교합자의 두개안모의 성장양상에 관한 누년적 연구, 대치교정지 1998 : 28 : 751-61
  23. Ricketts RM, Roth RH, Chacomas SJ, Schulhof RJ, Engel GA. Orthodontic diagnosis and planning, Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, 1982
  24. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof RJ. Bioprogressive Therapy, Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, 1979
  25. 백철호 역. 치과교정학 Bioprogressive 진단학, 서울 : 지성출판사, 1994
  26. 백철호 역. 치과교정학 : Bioprogressive 임상, 서울 . 지성출판사, 1995
  27. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957 : 27 : 14-37
  28. Ricketts RM, Roth RH, Chaconas SJ, Schulhof RJ, Angel GA.Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961 : 31 : 141-56
  29. Ricketts RM. A principal of arcial growth of the mandible. Angle Orthod 1972 : 42 : 368-86
  30. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometries. Am J Orthod 1972 : 61 : 1-28
  31. Johnston LE. A Statistical Evaluation of Cephalometric Prediction. Angle Orthod 1968 : 38 : 284-304
  32. Moorrees CA, Lebret L. The mesh diagram and cephalometries, Angle Orthod 1962 : 32 : 214-31
  33. Moss ML, Salentijn L, Ostreicher HP. The logarithmic properties of active and passive mandibular growth. Am J Orthod 1974 : 66 : 645-64
  34. McKeown M. The allometric growth of the skull. General model and prediction of facial growth. Am J Orthod 1975 : 67 : 412-22
  35. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969 : 55 : 585-99
  36. Bjork A. Variation in the growth pattern of the human mandible : Longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963 : 42 : 400-11 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420014701
  37. 전윤식, 노준. 성장을 고려한 두부 X-선 사진의 분석, 서울 : 지성출판사, 1999
  38. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Comtemporary Orthodontics, St Louis : CV Mosby, 2000
  39. Sato K, Abe M, Shirato Y, Mitani H. Standard growth curve of maxilla and mandible applied to the growth prediction based on standards of bone age(Tanner-Whitehouse 2 method) for Japanese females. The Journal of Japan Orthodontic Society 1996 : 55 : 545-48
  40. Sato K, Abe S, Mitani H. Estimation of mandibular growth using biological markers of bone metabolism in urine. Journal of the Japanese Orthodontic Society 1999 : 58 : 199-207
  41. Yamaguchi T, Maki K, Shibasaki Y. Growth hormone receptor gene variant and mandibular height in the normal Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001 : 119 : 650-3