DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ruminal Degradation of Sugarcane Stalk

  • Kawashima, T. (Department of Animal Feeding and Management, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Sience) ;
  • Sumamal, W. (Khon Kaen Animal Nutrition Research Center) ;
  • Pholsen, P. (Khon Kaen Animal Nutrition Research Center) ;
  • Chaithiang, R. (Khon Kaen Animal Nutrition Research Center) ;
  • Hayashi, Y. (Chugoku National Agricultural Experimental Station)
  • 투고 : 2002.06.18
  • 심사 : 2003.06.05
  • 발행 : 2003.09.01

초록

The number of protozoa and VFA content in the rumen fluid, in situ disappearance and turnover rate were examined with four rumen-fistulated cattle given either sugarcane stalk or Ruzi grass hay in order to clarify the manner of rumen digestion of sugarcane stalk. Cattle were given either sugarcane stalk or Ruzi grass hay at 1.0% of body weight level with commercial concentrate feed. Feeding sugarcane stalk reduced acetate content and increased propionate and butyrate contents in rumen fluid. While rapidlysoluble fraction of sugarcane stalk was 42%, the insoluble but potentially degradable fraction was only 17%. This clearly showed that sugarcane stalk mainly consisted of water soluble fraction (i.e. sugar) and tough fiber (i.e. bagasse). The ruminal degradation rate of both Ruzi grass hay and sugarcane stalk was lower in the animal given sugarcane stalk in comparison with those given Ruzi grass hay. While the turnover rate of liquid phase was about 50% higher in the animals given sugarcane stalk than in the animals given Ruzi grass hay, that of the solid phase was about 40% lower in the animals given sugarcane stalk. The effective degradability of DM of sugarcane stalk was higher than that of Ruzi grass hay. Sugarcane would be a promising roughage for ruminants in the tropics especially, in the dry season.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis (12th ed.). Association of Official Analysis Chemists. Washington DC.
  2. Boontum, A. and P. Thumtong. 1997. Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) In: A Guide Book for Field Crops Production in Thailand. Field Crops Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 21-31.
  3. Fernandez, A. and M. Gill. 1980. Rumen protozoa population in steers receiving diets based on whole sugar cane, derinded cane stalk or molasses and forage. Trop. Anim. Prod. 5:84-85.
  4. Fernandez, A., M. Gill, F. Done and T. R. Preston. 1980. Studies on the rumen fermentation pattern in cattle receiving diets based on chopped whole sugar cane or sugar cane juice. Trop. Anim. Prod. 5:288-289.
  5. Goering, H. H. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agr. Handbook No. 379, USDA.
  6. Kawashima, T., W. Sumamal, P. Pholsen, R. Chaithiang, M. Kurihara and M. Shibata. 2001a. Feeding value of sugarcane stalk for cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:55-60.
  7. Kawashima, T., W. Sumamal, P. Pholsen, R. Chaithiang and W. Boonpakdee. 2001b. The use of sugarcane stalk for feeding lactating cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:205-208.
  8. Leng, L. A. and T. R. Preston. 1976. Sugar cane for cattle production: present constraints, perspectives and research priorities. Trop. Anim. Prod. Vol.1. No.1 1-27.
  9. Leng, R. A. and T. R. Preston. 1988. Constraints of the efficient utilization of sugarcane and its byproducts as diets for production of large ruminants. In: Sugarcane as feed. (Ed. R. Sansoucy, G. Aarts and T. R. Preston) FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 284-309.
  10. Mould, F. L., E. R. orskov and S. O. Mann. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10:15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(83)90003-2
  11. Obara, Y. and D. W. Dellow. 1993. Effects of intraruminal infusions of urea, sucrose or urea plus sucrose on plasma urea and glucose kinetics in sheep fed chopped lucerne hay. J. Agri. Sci. 121:125-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600076875
  12. Obara, Y., H. Fuse, F. Terada, M. Shibata, A. Kawabata, M. Sutoh, K. Hodate and M. Matsumoto. 1994. Influence of sucrose supplementation on nitrogen kinetics and energy metabolism in sheep fed with Lucerne hay cubes. J. Agri. Sci. 123:121-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600067848
  13. Orskov, E. R. and F. D. DeB Hovell. 1977. Rumen digestion of hay (measured with dacron bags) by cattle given sugarcane or Pangola hay. Trop. Anim. Prod. 3:9-11.
  14. Orskov, E. R., F. D. Deb Hovell and F. Mould. 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod. 5:195-213.
  15. Orskov, E. R. and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to rate of passage. J. Agri. Sci. 92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
  16. SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Volume 2, Version 6, Fourth edition. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
  17. Uden, P., P. E. Colucci and P. J. Van Soest. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. J. Agri. Food Chem. 31:625-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310702
  18. Weatherburn, M. W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal. Chem. 39:971-974. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045

피인용 문헌

  1. Nutritional evaluation of Erianthus spp., Saccharum spontaneum, and Saccharum spp. hybrids as feed vol.49, pp.1, 2003, https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.49.73