DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Stem Cells and Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication in Carcinogenesis

  • Trosko, James E. (246 National Food Safety Toxicology Center, Dept. Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University)
  • Published : 2003.01.31

Abstract

Understanding the process of carcinogenesis will involve both the accumulation of many scientific facts derived from molecular, biochemical, cellular, physiological, whole animal experiments and epidemiological studies, as well as from conceptual understanding as to how to order and integrate those facts. From decades of cancer research, a number of the "hallmarks of cancer" have been identified, as well as their attendant concepts, including oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, cell cycle biochemistry, hypotheses of metastasis, angiogenesis, etc. While all these "hallmarks" are well known, two important concepts, with their associated scientific observations, have been generally ignored by many in the cancer research field. The objective of the short review is to highlight the concept of the role of human adult pluri-potent stem cells as "target cells" for the carcinogenic process and the concept of the role of gap junctional intercellular communication in the multi-stage, multi-mechanism process of carcinogenesis. With these two concepts, an attempt has been made to integrate the other well-known concepts, such as the multi-stage, multi-mechanisn or the "initiation/promotion/progression" hypothesis; the stem cell theory of carcinogenesis; the oncogene/tumor suppression theory and the mutation/epigenetic theories of carcinogenesis. This new "integrative" theory tries to explain the well-known "hallmarks" of cancers, including the observation that cancer cells lack either heterologous or homologous gap junctional intercellular communication whereas normal human adult stem cells do not have expressed or functional gap junctional intercellular communication. On the other hand, their normal differentiated, non-stem cell derivatives do express connexins and express gap junctional intercellular communication during their differentiation. Examination of the roles of chemical tumor promoters, oncogenes, connexin knock-out mice and roles of genetically-engineered tumor and normal cells with connexin and anti-sense connexin genes, respectively, seems to provide evidence which is consistent with the roles of both stem cells and gap junctional communication playing a major role in carcinogenesis. The integrative hypothesis provides new strategies for chemoprevention and chemotherapy which focuses on modulating connexin gene expression or gap junctional intercellular communication in the premalignant and malignant cells, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Boettner, B. and Van Aelst, L. (2002) The RASputin effect. Genes Dev. 16, 2033-2036. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1020602
  2. Borek, C. and Sachs, L. (1966) The difference in contact inhibition of cell replication between normal cells and cells transformed by different carcinogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 1711.
  3. Chang, C. C., Trosko, J. E., el-Fouly, M. R., Gibson, D. R. and D'Ambrosio, S. M. (1987) Contact insensitivity of a subpopulation of normal human fetal kidney epithelial cells and of human carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 47, 1634-1645.
  4. Dowling-Warriner, C. V. and Trosko, J. E. (2000) Induction of gap junctional intercellular communication, connexin43 expression, and subsequent differentiation in human fetal neuronal cells by stimulation of the cyclic AMP pathway. Neurosciences 95, 859-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00411-X
  5. Eagle, H. (1965) Growth regulatory effects of cellular interaction. Israel J. Med. Sci. 1, 1220-1228.
  6. Fialkow, P. J. (1979) Clonal origin of human tumors. Annu. Rev. Med. 30, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.me.30.020179.001031
  7. Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R. A. (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9
  8. Kao, C. Y., Nomata, K., Oakley, C. S., Welsch, C. W. and Chang, C. C. (1995) Two types of normal human breast epithelial cells derived from reduction mammoplasty: phenotypic characterization and response to SV40 transfection. Carcinogenesis 16, 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/16.3.531
  9. Lee, G. H. (2000) Paradoxical effects of phenobarbital on mouse hepatocarcinogenesis. Toxicol. Patlwl. 28. 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/019262330002800201
  10. Loewenstein, W. R. (1966) Permeability of membrane junctions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 137,441-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x
  11. Matic, M., Evans, W. H., Brink, P. R., and Simon, M. (2002) Epidermal stem cells do not communicate through gap junctions. J. Invest. Dermatol. 118, 110-I 16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01623.x
  12. Matic, M., Petrov, I. N., Chen, S., Wang. C., Dimitrijevich, S. D. and Wolosin, J. M. (1997) Stem cells of the corneal epithelium lack connexins and metabolite transfer capacity. Differentiation 61, 25 I -260. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1997.6140251.x
  13. Pitot. H. C. and Dragan, Y. P. (1991) Facts and theories concerning the mechanisms of carcinogenesis. FASEB J. 5, 2280-2286. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.5.9.1860619
  14. Pitot, H. C., Goldsworthy, T. L. and Moran, S. (1981) The natural history of carcinogenesis: Implications of experimental carcinogenesis in the genesis of human cancer. J. Supramoi. Struct. Cell Biochem. 17, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsscb.380170204
  15. Potter, V. R. (1978) Phenotypic diversity in experimental hepatomas: The concept of partially blocked ontogeny. Br. J. Cancer 38, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1978.159
  16. Sell, S. (1993) Cellular origin of cancer: dedifferentiation or stem cell maturation arrest? Environ. Health Perspect. 101 (Suppl 5), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101s315
  17. Sun, W., Kang. K. S .. Morita, 1., Trosko, J. E. and Chang, C. C. (1999) High susceptibility of a human breast epithelial cell type with stem cell characteristics to telomerase activation and immortalization. Cancer Res. 59, 6118-6123.
  18. Trosko, J. E. (2001) Commentary: Is the concept of "tumor promotion" a useful paradigm? Mol. Carcinog. 30, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.1021
  19. Trosko, J. E. and Chang, C. C. (1988) Nongenotoxic mechanisms in carcinogenesis; Role of inhibited intercellular communication: in Banbury Report 31: Carcinogen Risk Assessment: New Directions in the Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Aspects, Hart, R. W. and Hoerger, F. D. (eds.), pp. 139-70, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, New York.
  20. Trosko, J. E. and Chang, C. C. (1989) Stem cell theory of carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Lett. 49, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(89)90038-6
  21. Trosko, J. E. and Chang, C. C. (2001) Role of stem cells and gap junctional intercellular communication in human carcinogenesis. Radiat. Res. 155, 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0175:ROSCAG]2.0.CO;2
  22. Trosko, J. E., Chang, C. C., Madhukar, B. V. and Dupont, E. (1993) Oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and intercellular communication in the 'Oncogeny as partially blocked ontogeny' hypothesis: in New Frontiers in Cancer Causation, Iversen, O. H. (ed.), pp. 181-97, Taylor and Francis Publishers, Washington, D. C.
  23. Trosko, J. E., Chang, C. C., Madhukar, B. V. and Dupont, E. (1996) Intercellular communication: A paradigm for the interpretation of the initiation/promotion/progress model of carcinogenesis; in Chemical Induction of Cancer: Modulation and Combination Effects, Arcos, J. C. (ed.), pp. 205-225, Birkkhauser, Boston, Massachusetts.
  24. Trosko, J. E., Chang, C. C., Wilson, M. R, Upham, B. L., Hayashi, T. and Wade, M. (2000) Gap junctions and the regulation of cellular function of stem cells during development and differentiation. Methods 20, 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.1999.0941
  25. Trosko, J. E. and Ruch, R. J. (1998) Cell-cell communication in carcinogenesis. Front. Biosci. 3, 208-236. https://doi.org/10.2741/A275
  26. Trosko, J. E. and Ruch, R. J. Gap junctions as targets for cancer prevention and chemotherapy; in Current Drug Targets, Christ, G. J. (ed.), in press.
  27. Weinstein, I. B., Gattoni, C. S., Kirschmeier, P., Lambert, M., Hsiao, W., Backer, J. and Jeffrey, A. (1984) Multistage carcinogenesis involves multiple genes and multiple mechanisms. J. Cell Physiol. Suppl. 3, 127-137.
  28. Yamasaki, H., Hollstein, M., Mesnil, M., Martel, N. and Aguelon, A. M. (1987) Selective lack of intercellular communication between transformed and non transformed cells as a common property of chemical and oncogene transformation of BALB/ c3T3 cells. Cancer Res. 47, 5658-5664.
  29. Weinberg, R. A. (1991) Tumor suppressor genes. Science 254, 1138-1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1659741

Cited by

  1. The role of human adult stem cells and cell–cell communication in cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy strategies vol.591, pp.1-2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.034
  2. Changes in gap junctional connexin isoforms during prostate cancer progression vol.66, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.20317
  3. Decreased expression of the human stem cell marker, Rex-1 (zfp-42), in renal cell carcinoma vol.27, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgi299
  4. Factors to consider in the use of stem cells for pharmaceutic drug development and for chemical safety assessment vol.270, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.019
  5. A contemporary review of molecular candidates for the development and treatment of childhood medulloblastoma vol.29, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-2014-3
  6. Oxidative stress-induced biomarkers for stem cell-based chemical screening vol.54, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.013
  7. Modulation of prostate cancer growth in bone microenvironments vol.91, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10702
  8. Unifying concept of DNA repair: The polymerase scanning hypothesis vol.45, pp.2-3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20112
  9. Metastasen mit unbekanntem Primärtumor (CUP) vol.45, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-006-1054-2
  10. Intercellular interactions through gap junctions in embryonic stem cells vol.56, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350911010192
  11. Connexin Expression and Functional Analysis of Gap Junctional Communication in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells vol.26, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0482
  12. Epigenetic regulation of cellular adhesion in cancer vol.32, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgr120
  13. A FURTHER STUDY ON THE RELIABILITY OF TOXICOKINETIC PARAMETERS FOR PREDICTING HEPATOTOXICITY IN RATS RECEIVING A 28-DAY REPEATED ADMINISTRATION OF DDT vol.29, pp.5, 2004, https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.29.505
  14. Hallmarks of radiation carcinogenesis: ignored concepts vol.1258, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01210-X
  15. De Novo Reestablishment of Gap Junctional Intercellular Communications During Reprogramming to Pluripotency and Differentiation vol.21, pp.14, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2011.0707
  16. Gap junctional communication in the male reproductive system vol.1719, pp.1-2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.017
  17. Extracellular Vesicles: Evolving Factors in Stem Cell Biology vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1073140
  18. Survival of Mammary Stem Cells in Suspension Culture: Implications for Stem Cell Biology and Neoplasia vol.10, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-005-2542-5
  19. Pre-Natal Epigenetic Influences on Acute and Chronic Diseases Later in Life, such as Cancer: Global Health Crises Resulting from a Collision of Biological and Cultural Evolution vol.16, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3746/jfn.2011.16.4.394
  20. Connexins in respiratory and gastrointestinal mucosal immunity vol.588, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.02.059
  21. Connexin-43 can delay early recurrence and metastasis in patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma and low serum alpha-fetoprotein after radical hepatectomy vol.13, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-306
  22. Intercellular bridges are essential for human parthenogenetic cell survival vol.136, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2015.02.004
  23. Stem Cells in Toxicology: Fundamental Biology and Practical Considerations vol.120, pp.Supplement 1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq370
  24. Targeting gap junction intercellular communication as a potential therapy for HCV-related carcinogenesis vol.9, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl.14.50
  25. Benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide inhibits gap junction intercellular communication via phosphorylation of tumor progression locus 2 in WB-F344 rat liver epithelial cells vol.54, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.22103
  26. Commentary: “Re-Programming or Selecting Adult Stem Cells?” vol.4, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-008-9017-1
  27. Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma in a baboon (Papiosp.) vol.38, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2008.00304.x
  28. Localisation Microscopy of Breast Epithelial ErbB-2 Receptors and Gap Junctions: Trafficking after γ-Irradiation, Neuregulin-1β, and Trastuzumab Application vol.18, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020362
  29. Re-establishment of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) between human endometrial carcinomas by prostaglandin E2 vol.93, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.10.009
  30. Overexpression of connexin 43 reduces melanoma proliferative and metastatic capacity vol.113, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.162
  31. Low-dose ionizing radiation: induction of differential intracellular signalling possibly affecting intercellular communication vol.44, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-005-0269-8
  32. Neoplastic stem cells: A novel therapeutic target in clinical oncology vol.107, pp.10, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22277
  33. Mechanisms and markers of carcinogenesis and neoplastic progression vol.5, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.5.10.1317
  34. Lifespan Extension and Sustained Expression of Stem Cell Phenotype of Human Breast Epithelial Stem Cells in a Medium with Antioxidants vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4591310
  35. Regulation of gap junctions by tyrosine protein kinases vol.1662, pp.1-2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.018
  36. Pharmacology of Gap junctions. New pharmacological targets for treatment of arrhythmia, seizure and cancer? vol.1719, pp.1-2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.09.007
  37. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer vol.160, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009
  38. Adrenergic control of cardiac gap junction function and expression vol.383, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-011-0603-4
  39. Cancer and deregulation of stem cells pathways vol.2, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12156-008-0075-z
  40. Systems Biology: A Therapeutic Target for Tumor Therapy vol.1, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12307-008-0012-5
  41. Silver nanoparticles up-regulate Connexin43 expression and increase gap junctional intercellular communication in human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 vol.4, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390903576451
  42. Stochastic gene expression, disruption of tissue averaging effects and cancer as a disease of development vol.27, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20326
  43. The chemopreventive role of dietary phytochemicals through gap junctional intercellular communication vol.11, pp.2-3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-012-9235-7
  44. New basic science initiatives for improved understanding of radiation-induced multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) vol.Supplement_27, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19036098
  45. Connexin43 synthesis, phosphorylation, and degradation in regulation of transient inhibition of gap junction intercellular communication by the phorbol ester TPA in rat liver epithelial cells vol.302, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.09.004
  46. Cigarette smoke components inhibited intercellular communication and differentiation in human pancreatic ductal epithelial cells vol.120, pp.9, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22530
  47. The role of stem cells and cell–cell communication in radiation carcinogenesis: ignored concepts vol.Supplement_27, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/75133009
  48. Polyamines and cancer: old molecules, new understanding vol.4, pp.10, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1454
  49. Induction of iPS Cells and of Cancer Stem Cells: The Stem Cell or Reprogramming Hypothesis of Cancer? vol.297, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22793
  50. The impact of low-dose carcinogens and environmental disruptors on tissue invasion and metastasis vol.36, pp.Suppl 1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgv034
  51. Vesicle traffic through intercellular bridges in DU 145 human prostate cancer cells vol.8, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00328.x
  52. Defective gap junctional intercellular communication in the carcinogenic process vol.1719, pp.1-2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.004
  53. The gap junction as a “Biological Rosetta Stone”: implications of evolution, stem cells to homeostatic regulation of health and disease in the Barker hypothesis vol.5, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-010-0108-9
  54. Oxidative-Dependent Integration of Signal Transduction with Intercellular Gap Junctional Communication in the Control of Gene Expression vol.11, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2008.2146
  55. Addressing Stem Cell Therapeutic Approaches in Pathobiology of Diabetes and Its Complications vol.2018, pp.2314-6753, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7806435
  56. The emperor wears no clothes in the field of carcinogen risk assessment: ignored concepts in cancer risk assessment vol.20, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gei017
  57. Does the immune reaction cause malignant transformation by disrupting cell-to-cell or cell-to-matrix communications? vol.4, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-4-16