DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Digestive Parameters in an Indigenous Fat-tailed and a Conventional Dorper Sheep Fed on Maize Stover Crop Residue

  • Mwenya, B. (Department of Animal Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine) ;
  • Wollny, C. (Universities of Malawi, Bunda College of Agriculture) ;
  • Blummel, M. (University of Hohenheim Tropenzentrum) ;
  • Banda, J. (Universities of Malawi, Bunda College of Agriculture) ;
  • Takahashi, J. (Department of Animal Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine)
  • Received : 2002.08.20
  • Accepted : 2002.10.05
  • Published : 2003.04.01

Abstract

The intake, dry matter (DM) digestibility, total mean retention time (TMRT) and weight changes were investigated in four fat tailed and four Dorper sheep fed on a maize stover crop residue. Animals were subjected to five dietary treatments, which were: 90, 135 and $180g\;DM/kgBW^{0.75}/day$ of chopped maize stover offered with urea, and in subsequent dietary treatments $180g\;DM/kgBW^{0.75}/day$ of stover supplemented with either dried bean husks or poultry manure. Although not statistically different (p>0.05) fat tailed sheep had higher maize stover intake than the Dorper sheep when expressed per metabolic body weight. The DM intake and digestibility increased significantly (p<0.001) in both sheep breeds when the maize stover offer levels were increased from 90 to $135g/kgBW^{0.75}/day$. Dorper sheep had significantly (p<0.001) higher DM digestibility and longer total mean retention times for both the liquid and solid matter than the fat-tailed sheep. Fat-tailed sheep gained 4.75 kg while Dorper sheep gained 3.75 kg over the entire experimental period. The weight change per dietary treatment was affected by the amount of maize stover and the type and amount of supplement consumed. The higher DM digestibility and longer total mean retention time in Dorper sheep shows that the breed has adapted to utilize the low quality roughage diets. An indigenous fat tailed, has the potential to ingest high volumes of fibrous feed and has higher voluntary intakes relative to its body size. The two sheep breeds are a valuable genetic resource in sub Saharan Africa that is characterized by long dry season with no readily available and affordable conventional feeds for small ruminants.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Washington, DC.
  2. Calhoun, M. C., B. C. Baldwin Jr. and M. Shelton. 1984. Dry matter intake and digestibility and some blood constituents of goats and sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 59(Supp.1) p: 440.
  3. De Jong, R. and J. van Bruchem. 1992. Utilization of crop residues and supplementary feeds in tropical developing countries. Commission of European community, final report. pp. 16-22.
  4. Owen, E. 1994. Cereal crop residues as feed for goats and sheep. Livestock Res. Rural Develop. 6:47-61.
  5. Faichney, G. J. and S. G. Gharardi. 1986. Relationships between organic matter digestibility, dry matter intake and solute mean retention times in sheep given a ground and pelleted diet. J. Agric. Sci. 106:219-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063796
  6. International Livestock Center for Africa (ILCA) 1990. Annual Report and Programme Highlights. p. 120.
  7. Lindberg, J. E. 1985. Retention time of labeled feed particles and water in the gut of sheep given hay and concentrate at maintenance. Br. J. Nutr. 53:559-567. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19850065
  8. Mann, D. L., L. Goode and K. R. Pond. 1986. Voluntary intake, gain, digestibility, rate of passage and gastrointestinal tract fill in tropical and temperate breeds of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 64: 880-886.
  9. Methu, J. N., E. Owen, A. Abate and M. Scarr. 1996. Effect of level of offer of maize stover on the performance of lactating dairy cows. 23rd Tanzania Society of Animal Production Conference, Arusha, 21-23 August 1996.
  10. Mould, F. L., M. Saadullah, M. Hague, D. Davis, F. Dolberg and E. R. Orskov. 1982. Investigation of some of the physiological factors influencing intake and digestion of rice straw by native cattle in Bangladesh. Tropical Anim. Prod. 7:174-181.
  11. Mwenya, B., M. Blummel and C. Wollny. 1995. Phenotypic differences in digestive parameters between indigenous Malawi sheep and Dorper males. Proceeding of the International symposium on Livestock Production through Animal Breeding and Genetics. May 10-11, 1995 Sheraton Hotel, Harare, Zimbabwe. pp. 104-106.
  12. Ndosa, J. E. M. 1980. A comparative study of roughage utilization by sheep and goats. Thesis, University of Readings (UK). p. 164.
  13. Orskov, E. R., I. Oiwang and G. W. Reid. 1988. A study on consistency of differences between cows in rumen outflow rate of fibrous particles and other substrates and consequences for digestibility and intake of roughage. Anim. Prod. 47:47-51.
  14. Osafo, E. L. K., E. Owen, J. Methu, A. Abate, J. C. Tanner and A. A. O. Aboud. 1997. Excess feeding of stovers from sorghum and maize for small ruminants and cattle in cereal based integrated farming systems in Africa. Second FAO Electronic Conference: Tropical Feeds Livestock Feed Resources within Integrated Farming Systems. pp. 1-10.
  15. Owen, E., R. A. Washed, R. Alimon and W. El-Naiem. 1989. Strategies for feeding straw to small ruminants: Upgrading or generous feeding to allow selective feeding. In overcoming constrains to the efficient utilization of Agricultural byproducts as animal feed. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual workshop held at Mankon Station, Bameda, Cameroun, 20-27 October 1987. pp. 1-22.
  16. Silanikove, N. 1986. Interrelationships between feed quality, digestibility, feed consumption and energy requirements in desert (Bedouin) and temperate (Saanen) goats. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2157-2162. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80648-8
  17. SAS Institute Inc. 1994. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 6. 6th edn. SAS Institute Inc. Cary NC.
  18. Theielemans, M. R., E. Francois, E. Bodart and A. Thewis. 1978. Measurement of gastrointestinal transit time in pigs by radiolanthanide and comparison with sheep. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochem. Biophys. 18:237-247. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19780203
  19. Uden, P., P. E. Colucci and P. J. van Soest. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta, rate of passage studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31:625-632. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310702
  20. Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robertson. 1986. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. Lab. Manual for Animal Science 613. Dept. Animal Sci., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  21. Washed, R. A., E. Owen, M. Naate and B. J. Hitosking. 1990. Feeding straw to small ruminants and the effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep. Anim. Prod. 51:283-289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100005432
  22. Weyreter, H., R. Heller, D. Dellow, M. Lechner-Doll and W. V. Engelhardt. 1987. Rumen fluid volume and retention time of digesta in an indigenous and a conventional breed of sheep fed a low quality, fibrous diet. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 58: 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1987.tb00151.x
  23. Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Lismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in feces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X

Cited by

  1. Introduction of Dorper sheep into Australian rangelands: implications for production and natural resource management vol.36, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ13034