An Accelerated Inverse Perturbation Method for Structural Damage Identification

  • Park, Young-Jae (Post-Doctoral Researcher, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Usik (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University)
  • 발행 : 2003.05.01

초록

In the previous study, the inverse perturbation method was used to identify structural damages. Because all unmeasured DOFs were considered as unknown variables, considerable computational effort was required to obtain reliable results. Thus, in the present study, a system condensation method is used to transform the unmeasured DOFs into the measured DOFs, which eliminates the remaining unmeasured DOFs to improve computational efficiency. However, there may still arise a numerically ill-conditioned problem, if the system condensation is not adequate for numerical Programming or if the system condensation is not recalibrated with respect to the structural changes. This numerical problem is resolved in the present study by adopting more accurate accelerated improved reduced system (AIRS) as well as by updating the transformation matrix at every step. The criterion on the required accuracy of the condensation method is also proposed. Finally, numerical verification results of the present accelerated inverse perturbation method (AIPM) are presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chen, J. C. and Garba, J. A., 1988, 'On-Orbit Damage Assessment for Large Space Structures,' AIAA Journal, pp. 1119-1126
  2. Cho, K., Shin, J. and Lee, U., 2002, 'Experimental Verification of the Str-uctural Damage Identification Method Developed for Beam Structures,' Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. 2574-2580 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2002.26.12.2574
  3. Choi, Y. J., 2001, 'System Reduction and Selection of Degrees of Freedom in Structural Dynamic Inverse Problems,' Ph. D. Thesis, Inha University, Incheon, Korea
  4. Doebling, S. W., Farrar, C. R., Prime, M. B. and Shevitz, D. W., 1996, 'Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review,' Los Alamos National Report LA-l3070-MS
  5. Doebling, S. W., 1996, 'Minimum-Rank Optimal Update of Elemental Stiffness Parameters for Structural Damage Identification,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 2615-2621 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13447
  6. Farrar, C. R. and Doebling, S. W., 1997, 'An Overview of Modal-Based Damage Identification Methods,' Proceeding of DAMAS Conference, Sheffield, UK
  7. Gatka, G. K. and Zimmerman, D. C., 1996, 'Structural Damage Detection via Least Squares Dynamic Residual Force Minimization with Quadratic Measurement Error Inequality Constraint (LSQIC*),' 14th IMAC, pp.1278-1284
  8. Guyan, R. J., 1965, 'Reduction of Stiffness and Mass Matrices,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 380 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2874
  9. Kammer, D. C., 1988, 'Optimum Approximation for Residual Stiffness in Linear System Identification,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 104-112 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9857
  10. Kaouk, M. and Zimmerman, D. C., 'Structural Damage Assessment Using a Generalized Minimum Rank Perturbation Theory,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No.4, 1994, pp.836-842 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12061
  11. Kim, K. O. and Kang, M. K., 2001, 'Convergence Acceleration of Iterative Modal Reduction Methods,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No.1, pp. 134-140 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1281
  12. Lee, U. and Shin, J., 2002, 'A Frequency Response Function-Based Structural Damage Identification Method,' Computers & Structures, Vol. 80, No.2, pp. 117-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00170-5
  13. Lee, U. and Shin, J., 2002, 'A Frequency-Domain Method of Structural Damage Identification Formulated from Dynamic Stiffness Equation of Motion,' Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 257, No.4, pp. 615-634 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5058
  14. Luenberger, D. G., 1984, Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp. 382 - 383
  15. O'Callahan, J., 1989, 'A Procedure for an Improved Reduced System (IRS) Model,' Proceedings of the 7th International Modal Analysis Conference, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 17-21
  16. Papadopoulos, M. and Garcia, E., 1998, 'Sensor Placement Methodologies for Dynamic Testing,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No.2, pp.256-263 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7509
  17. Penny, J. E. T., Friswell, M. I. and Garvey, S. D., 1994, 'Automatic Choice of Measurement Locations for Dynamic Testing,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No.2, pp.407-414 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11998
  18. Shah, V. N. and Raymund, M., 1982, 'Analytical Selection of Masters for the Reduced Eigenvalue Problem,' International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 18, pp.89-98 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620180108
  19. Smith, S. W. and Beattie, C. A., 1991, 'Secant-Method Adjustment for Structural Models,' AIAA Journal, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 119-126 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10553