DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Structural Performance Point Utilizing The Seismic Isolation Rubber Bearing Design Method

면진격리 고무베어링 설계법을 이용한 구조물의 성능점 예측

  • 김창훈 (아주대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 좌동훈 (㈜ 에스텍 컨설팅그룹 건축구조팀)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

The seismic base isolation design approach has been reviewed and modified to fit the nonlinear static analysis procedure for determination of the performance point of structures in a simpler way, such an adaptation may be possible for the fact that a structural system under development of damage due to earthquake loading keeps softening to result in period shifting toward longer side. The superiority of the proposed method to the state-of-the-practice approach is that the reasonably accurate performance point can be obtained without constructing the so-called acceleration displacement response spectrum required in application of capacity spectrum method. The validity of the proposed approach was verified by comparing the predicted values to the exact ones presented in the literature.

면진격리 고무베어링의 설계법을 수정하여 구조물의 성능점 예측을 위한 간편한 해석방법을 제안하였다. 이러한 적용이 가능한 것은 구조물이 지진력의 작용으로 인하여 손상을 입게 되면 구조물의 항복 후 강성은 연화되고, 이로 말미암아 구조물의 동적 특성이 장주기화 하기 때문이다. 제안된 해석법이 기존의 방법에 비하여 우월한 것은 능력스펙트럼법이 요구하는대로 보유능력곡선과 요구량스펙트럼을 가속도-변위 좌표계로 치환하지 않고서도 비교적 정확한 성능점을 예측할 수 있다는 것이다. 제안된 방법의 타당성은 문헌에서 보이는 정확한 값과의 비교에 의하여 입증하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO, Guide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., 1991.
  2. UBC, Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, California, U.S.A., 1994.
  3. NEHRP, Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings: 1994 Edition, FEMA 222A, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  4. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings: Volume 1, Applied Technology Council, 1996.
  5. NEHRP, Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., 1997.
  6. 김진구, 방성혁, “직접 변위설계법을 이용한 구조물의 내진성능평가”, 한국지진공학회 논문집, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002. 4, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2002.6.2.001
  7. 대한건축학회, 건축물 하중기준 및 해설, 태림문화사, 2000.
  8. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges: Division I-A Seismic Design, 15th Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., 1992.
  9. Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J., “Earthquake Spectra and Design,” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, Calif., 1982.
  10. Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures - Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall International, Inc., 1995.
  11. 김장훈, 좌동훈, “에너지 흡수효율에 의한 철근콘크리트 구조물의 감쇠비 수정계수 결정”, 콘크리트학회 가을 학술발표회 논문집, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002. 10., pp. 161-166.
  12. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings: Volume 2-Appendices, Applied Technology Council, 1996.