DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Preparation of Wanjajun for Cook/Chill System II Quality Characteristics of Wanjajun Containing Hydrocolloids

Cook/Chill System에서의 고기완자 제조에 관한 연구II. Hydrocolloid 첨가 고기완자의 품질 특성

  • Kang, Eun-Zoo (Dept. of Food & Nutrition Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Young (Dept. of Food & Nutrition Kunsan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Chung-Hee (Dept. of Food & Nutrition Kunsan National University)
  • 강은주 (군산대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김선영 (군산대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 유정희 (군산대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Published : 2003.07.01

Abstract

Low-fat, precooked high quality Wanjajun was prepared by treating natural antioxidant herbs and hydrocolloids for quantity production of cook/chill system in foodservice. The proposed Wanjajun was formulated under the consideration of flavor and fat level. Wanjajun was prepared with hydrocolloid such as sodium alginate, car-boxymethyl cellulose (CMC), carrageenan and xanthan gum. Cooking yield, fat retention and water holding capacity of Wanjajun containing hydrocolloidal gums were higher than those of control. L-value of raw product was low in comparison with cooked product, but a-value was higher than that of other cooked product. Colors of raw and cooked products were not different among five kinds of products. pH value of cooked product was higher than that of raw product pH range of cooked products revealed to 6.10~6.23. There was no considerable change in pH value during storage. The coliform group and Staphylococus aureus were not detected during storage. Total bacteria1 counts were close to microbial guidelines for safe condition. Hardness, springness, cohesiveness, gumminess and brittleness of low-fat products were generally lower than those of control product. Hardness, gumminess and brittleness of reheated products were higher than those of preheated products. Flavor, tenderness, juiciness and overall quality were not different between precooked and reheated products. Textural characteristics of products were superior in the order of sodium alginate, xanthan gum, CMC, carrageenan and control product.

조리수율과 지방 보유율 및 보수력은 hydrocolloid 첨가구에 비하여 대조구가 가장 낮았으며 hydrocolloid는 식품의 증점성, 유화 안정성, gel형성, 피막형성 등의 기능을 가지고 있어서 가열중의 드립의 양을 감소시키고, 지방과 결합하여 지방보유율을 높일 수 있었다. pH는 조리전보다 조리후에 높아지는 경향을 나타냈고, 재가열시에는 조리후보다 같거나 약간 감소하는 경향을 나타냈으며 hydrocolloid 첨가구가 대조구에 비해 높은 경향을 나타냈다. 모든 실험군을 8일간 저장하는 동안 총균수는 큰 증가를 보이지 않았으며 황색포도상구균과 대장균 또한 검출되지 않아 저장기간동안 비교적 신선한 상태를 유지하고 있었다고 볼 수 있었다. 재가열한 대조구의 경도, 뭉침성, 부서짐성 등은 hydrocolloid를 첨가한 완자보다 높은 경향을 나타냈는데, 이는 hydrocolloid의 보수력과 유화안정성 때문이라고 할 수 있으며 결국 지방을 줄이면서 hydrocolloid와 두부를 첨가한 완자가 지방을 20% 첨가한 완자보다 조직적 특성이 비슷하거나 우수하여 지방 대체제로서의 hydrocolloid와 두부의 이용 가능성을 제시하였다. 대조구에 비하여 hydrocolloid를 첨가한 완자가 전반적인 관능수용도 역시 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 시료간의 유의적인 차이는 없었으나 제조 후의 다즙성, 조직감, 종합적인 품질은 xanthan gum 첨가구가 가장 좋았으며, 재가열한 제품에서는 sodium alginate 첨가구가 가장 좋았다. 이처럼 조직적인 특성과 함께 관능적인 면에서도 hydrocolloid첨가 완자가 대조구에 비해 좋은 결과를 나타낸 것은 저지방 기능성 육제품의 제조에 있어서 hydrocolloid첨가가 긍정적인 영향을 줄 수 있다는 것을 나타낸다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoo YS. 1996. The conciousness of primary school children and their parents about school food service and food preference of children in Korea and Japan. J Korean Dietary Culture 11: 13-21
  2. Berry BW. 1997. Sodium alginate plus modified tapioca starch improves properties of low-fat beef patties. J Food Sci 62: 1245-1249 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb12254.x
  3. Lin KW, Keeton JT. 1998. Textural and physicochemical properties of low fat, precooked ground beef patties containing carrageenan and sodium alginate. J Food Sci 63: 571-574 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15787.x
  4. Song HI, Park CK, Nam JH, Yang JB, Kim DS, Moon YH, Jung IC. 2002. Quality and palatability of beef patty containing gums. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 31: 64-68 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.1.064
  5. Egbert WR, Huffman DL, Chen CM, Dylewski DP. 1991. Development of low-fat ground beef. Food Technology June 64-73
  6. Igol RS. 1982. Hydrocolloids interactions useful in food systems. Food Technology April 72-74
  7. Sharma SC. 1981. Gums and hydrocolloids in oil-water emulsions. Food Technology January 59-67
  8. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington DC
  9. Cannell LE, Savell JW, Smith SB, Cross HR, John LC. 1989. Fatty acid composition and caloric value of ground beef containing low levels of fat. J Food Sci 54: 1163-1168 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb05946.x
  10. Jung IC, Kim DW, Lee KS. 2000. Quality characteristics of beef patty containing gums. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 10: 404-410
  11. Young LL, Garcia JM, Lillard HS, Lyon CE, Papa CM. 1991. Fat content effects on yield, quality, and microbiological characteristics of chicken patties. J Food Sci 56: 1527-1528 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb08632.x
  12. Minstry of Health & Welfare. 1988. Food Code
  13. Kim YC, Ku KH. 1998. Food Sensory Analysis. Hyoil publishing, Seoul
  14. Kwangju Social Research Center. 2000. Statistics and data analysis for non-statisticians: using windows SAS.
  15. Park CK, Song HI, Nam JH, Moon YH, Jung IC. 2000. Effect of hydrocolloids on physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of pork patties. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 586-591
  16. Lee SK. 1998. Antioxidant enzymes in relation to oxidative deterioration of muscle foods. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 18: 97-106
  17. Kim DH. 1990. Food chemistry. Tamgudang, Seoul
  18. Hsia HY, Smith DM, Steffe JF. 1992. Rheological properties and adhesion characteristics of flour-based batters for chicken nuggets as affected by three hydrocolloids. J Food Sci 57: 16-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb05414.x
  19. Reagon JO, Jeremiah LE, Smith GC, Carpenter ZL. 1971. Vacuum packaging of lamb. I. Microbial consideration. J Food Sci 36: 764 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb03300.x
  20. Song HI, Moon GI, Moon YH, Jung IC. 2000. Quality and storage stability of hamburger during low temperature storage. J Korean Food Sci Ani Resour 20: 72-78
  21. Ser JH, Kim MN, Chung YH. 1997. Microbial safety and nutrition analysis of hamburgers. J Korean Food Sci Ani Resour 17: 74-80
  22. Berry BW. 1994. Fat level, high temperature cooking and degree of doneness affect sensory, chemical and physical properties of beef patties. J Food Sci 59: 10-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1994.tb06885.x
  23. Cross HR, Berry BW, Wells LH. 1980. Effects of fat level and source on the chemical, sensory and cooking properties of ground beef patties. J Food Sci 45: 791-793 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb07450.x
  24. Kregel KK, Prusa KJ, Hughes KV. 1986. Cholesterol content and sensory analysis of ground beef as influenced by fat level, heating, and storage. J Food Sci 51: 1162-1165 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13073.x
  25. Troutt ES, Hunt MC, Johnson DE, Claus JR, Kastner CL, Kropf DH, Stroda S. 1992. Chemical, physical, and sensory characterization of ground beef containing 5 to 30 percent fat. J Food Sci 57: 25-29 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb05416.x

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Quality Characteristics Between Meat Ball Products in Korean Domestic Market vol.55, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.5.461
  2. Quality Characteristics of Pork Patties with Rosemary and Kimchi Powder during Cold Storage vol.27, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2011.27.2.125
  3. Quality of Soy-Based Patties Using κ-Carrageenan and Methyl-Cellulose as Binders During Cold Storage Periods vol.24, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2020.24.4.317